283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21182127)
1. Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient value and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging findings with prognostic factors in invasive ductal carcinoma.
Jeh SK; Kim SH; Kim HS; Kang BJ; Jeong SH; Yim HW; Song BJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Jan; 33(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 21182127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Invasive ductal carcinoma: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient value with pathological prognostic factors.
Razek AA; Gaballa G; Denewer A; Nada N
NMR Biomed; 2010 Jul; 23(6):619-23. PubMed ID: 20232453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diffusion-weighted imaging of mucinous carcinoma of the breast: evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient and signal intensity in correlation with histologic findings.
Woodhams R; Kakita S; Hata H; Iwabuchi K; Umeoka S; Mountford CE; Hatabu H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 193(1):260-6. PubMed ID: 19542422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer: correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient value with prognostic factors.
Kim SH; Cha ES; Kim HS; Kang BJ; Choi JJ; Jung JH; Park YG; Suh YJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Sep; 30(3):615-20. PubMed ID: 19711411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diffusion-weighted imaging in breast cancer: relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient and tumour aggressiveness.
Costantini M; Belli P; Rinaldi P; Bufi E; Giardina G; Franceschini G; Petrone G; Bonomo L
Clin Radiol; 2010 Dec; 65(12):1005-12. PubMed ID: 21070905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diffusion weighted imaging and estimation of prognosis using apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in ischemic stroke.
Gonen KA; Simsek MM
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Nov; 76(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 19560890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical utility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in patients with prostate cancer: can ADC values contribute to assess the aggressiveness of prostate cancer?
Itou Y; Nakanishi K; Narumi Y; Nishizawa Y; Tsukuma H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Jan; 33(1):167-72. PubMed ID: 21182135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is there different correlation with prognostic factors between "non-mass" and "mass" type invasive ductal breast cancers?
Jiang L; Zhou Y; Wang Z; Lu X; Chen M; Zhou C
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Sep; 82(9):1404-9. PubMed ID: 23540946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient at 3.0t: Correlation with prognostic factors and subtypes of invasive ductal carcinoma.
Kim EJ; Kim SH; Park GE; Kang BJ; Song BJ; Kim YJ; Lee D; Ahn H; Kim I; Son YH; Grimm R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 42(6):1666-78. PubMed ID: 25919239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of time-intensity curves in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and mastopathy obtained using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Nishiura M; Yasuhiro T; Murase K
Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Jan; 29(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 20833496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative diffusion weighted imaging for differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: the influence of the choice of b-values.
Peters NH; Vincken KL; van den Bosch MA; Luijten PR; Mali WP; Bartels LW
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 May; 31(5):1100-5. PubMed ID: 20432344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Apparent diffusion coefficient of diffusion weighted MRI in endometrial carcinoma-Relationship with local invasiveness.
Cao K; Gao M; Sun YS; Li YL; Sun Y; Gao YN; Zhang XP
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 81(8):1926-30. PubMed ID: 21592709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of PROPELLER diffusion weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient in the diagnosis of sellar and parasellar lesions.
Mahmoud OM; Tominaga A; Amatya VJ; Ohtaki M; Sugiyama K; Saito T; Sakoguchi T; Kinoshita Y; Shrestha P; Abe N; Akiyama Y; Takeshima Y; Arita K; Kurisu K; Yamasaki F
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jun; 74(3):420-7. PubMed ID: 19394778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient as a noninvasive imaging biomarker for the differentiation of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ.
Bickel H; Pinker-Domenig K; Bogner W; Spick C; Bagó-Horváth Z; Weber M; Helbich T; Baltzer P
Invest Radiol; 2015 Feb; 50(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 25333308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Kinetic characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in dynamic breast MRI using computer-assisted analysis.
Vag T; Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Benndorf M; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Acta Radiol; 2010 Nov; 51(9):955-61. PubMed ID: 20942728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diffusion tensor MRI: preliminary anisotropy measures and mapping of breast tumors.
Partridge SC; Ziadloo A; Murthy R; White SW; Peacock S; Eby PR; DeMartini WB; Lehman CD
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Feb; 31(2):339-47. PubMed ID: 20099346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diffusion-weighted imaging and (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in breast cancer: Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient and maximum standardized uptake values with prognostic factors.
Karan B; Pourbagher A; Torun N
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 43(6):1434-44. PubMed ID: 26663655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diffusion-weighted imaging of primary brain lymphomas: effect of ADC value and signal intensity of T2-weighted imaging.
Akter M; Hirai T; Makino K; Kitajima M; Murakami R; Fukuoka H; Sasao A; Kuratsu J; Yamashita Y
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Oct; 32(7):539-43. PubMed ID: 18617368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Imaging parameter effects in apparent diffusion coefficient determination of magnetic resonance imaging.
Ogura A; Hayakawa K; Miyati T; Maeda F
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Jan; 77(1):185-8. PubMed ID: 19646836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
