These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21182135)

  • 1. Clinical utility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in patients with prostate cancer: can ADC values contribute to assess the aggressiveness of prostate cancer?
    Itou Y; Nakanishi K; Narumi Y; Nishizawa Y; Tsukuma H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Jan; 33(1):167-72. PubMed ID: 21182135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diffusion-weighted imaging in the prostate: an apparent diffusion coefficient comparison of half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo and echo planar imaging.
    Babourina-Brooks B; Cowin GJ; Wang D
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Feb; 30(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 22055748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Apparent diffusion coefficient: prostate cancer versus noncancerous tissue according to anatomical region.
    Kim JH; Kim JK; Park BW; Kim N; Cho KS
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1173-9. PubMed ID: 18837000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical utility of apparent diffusion coefficient values obtained using high b-value when diagnosing prostate cancer using 3 tesla MRI: comparison between ultra-high b-value (2000 s/mm²) and standard high b-value (1000 s/mm²).
    Kitajima K; Takahashi S; Ueno Y; Yoshikawa T; Ohno Y; Obara M; Miyake H; Fujisawa M; Sugimura K
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Jul; 36(1):198-205. PubMed ID: 22371381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Apparent diffusion coefficient for prostate cancer imaging: impact of B values.
    Peng Y; Jiang Y; Antic T; Sethi I; Schmid-Tannwald C; Eggener S; Oto A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Mar; 202(3):W247-53. PubMed ID: 24555621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Apparent diffusion coefficient values in peripheral and transition zones of the prostate: comparison between normal and malignant prostatic tissues and correlation with histologic grade.
    Tamada T; Sone T; Jo Y; Toshimitsu S; Yamashita T; Yamamoto A; Tanimoto D; Ito K
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Sep; 28(3):720-6. PubMed ID: 18777532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correlation of ADC and T2 measurements with cell density in prostate cancer at 3.0 Tesla.
    Gibbs P; Liney GP; Pickles MD; Zelhof B; Rodrigues G; Turnbull LW
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):572-6. PubMed ID: 19692841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Non-Gaussian water diffusion kurtosis imaging of prostate cancer.
    Suo S; Chen X; Wu L; Zhang X; Yao Q; Fan Y; Wang H; Xu J
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 32(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 24602826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differentiation of central gland prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia using monoexponential and biexponential diffusion-weighted imaging.
    Liu X; Zhou L; Peng W; Wang C; Wang H
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Oct; 31(8):1318-24. PubMed ID: 23791546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prostate cancer: utility of diffusion-weighted imaging as a marker of side-specific risk of extracapsular extension.
    Rosenkrantz AB; Chandarana H; Gilet A; Deng FM; Babb JS; Melamed J; Taneja SS
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Aug; 38(2):312-9. PubMed ID: 23238968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient calculation between two-point and multipoint B value analyses in prostate cancer and benign prostate tissue at 3 T: preliminary experience.
    Park SY; Kim CK; Park BK; Kwon GY
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W287-94. PubMed ID: 25148186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient value and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging findings with prognostic factors in invasive ductal carcinoma.
    Jeh SK; Kim SH; Kim HS; Kang BJ; Jeong SH; Yim HW; Song BJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Jan; 33(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 21182127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diffusion-weighted MRI as a predictor of extracapsular extension in prostate cancer.
    Kim CK; Park SY; Park JJ; Park BK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Mar; 202(3):W270-6. PubMed ID: 24555624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Repeatability of echo-planar-based diffusion measurements of the human prostate at 3 T.
    Gibbs P; Pickles MD; Turnbull LW
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Dec; 25(10):1423-9. PubMed ID: 17499468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diffusion-weighted imaging of primary brain lymphomas: effect of ADC value and signal intensity of T2-weighted imaging.
    Akter M; Hirai T; Makino K; Kitajima M; Murakami R; Fukuoka H; Sasao A; Kuratsu J; Yamashita Y
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Oct; 32(7):539-43. PubMed ID: 18617368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison between two-point and four-point methods for quantification of apparent diffusion coefficient of normal liver parenchyma and focal lesions. Value of normalization with spleen.
    Papanikolaou N; Gourtsoyianni S; Yarmenitis S; Maris T; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Feb; 73(2):305-9. PubMed ID: 19091503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diffusion weighted imaging and estimation of prognosis using apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in ischemic stroke.
    Gonen KA; Simsek MM
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Nov; 76(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 19560890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate: Comparison of b1000 and b2000 image sets for index lesion detection.
    Rosenkrantz AB; Hindman N; Lim RP; Das K; Babb JS; Mussi TC; Taneja SS
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Sep; 38(3):694-700. PubMed ID: 23371846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Role of PROPELLER diffusion weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient in the diagnosis of sellar and parasellar lesions.
    Mahmoud OM; Tominaga A; Amatya VJ; Ohtaki M; Sugiyama K; Saito T; Sakoguchi T; Kinoshita Y; Shrestha P; Abe N; Akiyama Y; Takeshima Y; Arita K; Kurisu K; Yamasaki F
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jun; 74(3):420-7. PubMed ID: 19394778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Apparent diffusion coefficient ratio correlates significantly with prostate cancer gleason score at final pathology.
    Boesen L; Chabanova E; Løgager V; Balslev I; Thomsen HS
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Aug; 42(2):446-53. PubMed ID: 25408104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.