These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21183543)

  • 41. Computer analysis of mFISH chromosome aberration data uncovers an excess of very complicated metaphases.
    Vazquez M; Greulich-Bode KM; Arsuaga J; Cornforth MN; Brückner M; Sachs RK; Hlatky L; Molls M; Hahnfeldt P
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2002 Dec; 78(12):1103-15. PubMed ID: 12556338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Telomere length in mammalian cells exposed to low- and high-LET radiations.
    Sgura A; Antoccia A; Berardinelli F; Cherubini R; Gerardi S; Zilio C; Tanzarella C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 122(1-4):176-9. PubMed ID: 17223635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. DNA Replication Stress and Chromosomal Instability: Dangerous Liaisons.
    Wilhelm T; Said M; Naim V
    Genes (Basel); 2020 Jun; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 32532049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Mechanistic modelling allows to assess pathways of DNA lesion interactions underlying chromosome aberration formation].
    Eĭdel'man IuA; Slanina SV; Sal'nikov IV; Andreev SG
    Genetika; 2012 Dec; 48(12):1427-36. PubMed ID: 23516904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The cancer biology of whole-chromosome instability.
    Duijf PH; Benezra R
    Oncogene; 2013 Oct; 32(40):4727-36. PubMed ID: 23318433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Chromatin structure and radiation-induced DNA damage: from structural biology to radiobiology.
    Lavelle C; Foray N
    Int J Biochem Cell Biol; 2014 Apr; 49():84-97. PubMed ID: 24486235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Mitotic DNA Damage Response: At the Crossroads of Structural and Numerical Cancer Chromosome Instabilities.
    Bakhoum SF; Kabeche L; Compton DA; Powell SN; Bastians H
    Trends Cancer; 2017 Mar; 3(3):225-234. PubMed ID: 28718433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A novel assay to screen siRNA libraries identifies protein kinases required for chromosome transmission.
    Liskovykh M; Goncharov NV; Petrov N; Aksenova V; Pegoraro G; Ozbun LL; Reinhold WC; Varma S; Dasso M; Kumeiko V; Masumoto H; Earnshaw WC; Larionov V; Kouprina N
    Genome Res; 2019 Oct; 29(10):1719-1732. PubMed ID: 31515286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Numerical chromosomal instability mediates susceptibility to radiation treatment.
    Bakhoum SF; Kabeche L; Wood MD; Laucius CD; Qu D; Laughney AM; Reynolds GE; Louie RJ; Phillips J; Chan DA; Zaki BI; Murnane JP; Petritsch C; Compton DA
    Nat Commun; 2015 Jan; 6():5990. PubMed ID: 25606712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Inducible genomic instability: new insights into the biological effects of ionizing radiation.
    Wright EG
    Med Confl Surviv; 2000; 16(1):117-30; discussion 131-3. PubMed ID: 10824528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Ionizing radiation induces delayed hyperrecombination in Mammalian cells.
    Huang L; Grim S; Smith LE; Kim PM; Nickoloff JA; Goloubeva OG; Morgan WF
    Mol Cell Biol; 2004 Jun; 24(11):5060-8. PubMed ID: 15143196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The interplay between chromosome stability and cell cycle control explored through gene-gene interaction and computational simulation.
    Frumkin JP; Patra BN; Sevold A; Ganguly K; Patel C; Yoon S; Schmid MB; Ray A
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Sep; 44(17):8073-85. PubMed ID: 27530428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The in vivo expression of radiation-induced chromosomal instability has an inflammatory mechanism.
    Mukherjee D; Coates PJ; Lorimore SA; Wright EG
    Radiat Res; 2012 Jan; 177(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 22050452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Profiling DNA damage response following mitotic perturbations.
    S Pedersen R; Karemore G; Gudjonsson T; Rask MB; Neumann B; Hériché JK; Pepperkok R; Ellenberg J; Gerlich DW; Lukas J; Lukas C
    Nat Commun; 2016 Dec; 7():13887. PubMed ID: 27976684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A novel multiplexed, image-based approach to detect phenotypes that underlie chromosome instability in human cells.
    Thompson LL; McManus KJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0123200. PubMed ID: 25893404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Detection of Nuclear Biomarkers for Chromosomal Instability.
    Pons C; Almacellas E; Tauler A; Mauvezin C
    Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2445():117-125. PubMed ID: 34972989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Unrepaired DNA damage facilitates elimination of uniparental chromosomes in interspecific hybrid cells.
    Wang Z; Yin H; Lv L; Feng Y; Chen S; Liang J; Huang Y; Jiang X; Jiang H; Bukhari I; Wu L; Cooke HJ; Shi Q
    Cell Cycle; 2014; 13(8):1345-56. PubMed ID: 24608870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Karyotypic instability of endoprophase and mitotic cells of Amoeba sp. strain Cont from the "proteus-type" group (Amoebozoa, Euamoebida, Amoebidae).
    Demin SY; Berdieva MA; Podlipaeva YI; Goodkov AV
    Eur J Protistol; 2020 Jun; 74():125691. PubMed ID: 32200034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Chromosomal instability in cancer: causality and interdependence.
    Venkitaraman AR
    Cell Cycle; 2007 Oct; 6(19):2341-3. PubMed ID: 17700075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Chromosomal instability and its effect on cell lines.
    He Z; Wilson A; Rich F; Kenwright D; Stevens A; Low YS; Thunders M
    Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2023 Jun; 6(6):e1822. PubMed ID: 37095005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.