These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21184110)

  • 1. Robotic suturing on the FLS model possesses construct validity, is less physically demanding, and is favored by more surgeons compared with laparoscopy.
    Stefanidis D; Hope WW; Scott DJ
    Surg Endosc; 2011 Jul; 25(7):2141-6. PubMed ID: 21184110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotic assistance improves intracorporeal suturing performance and safety in the operating room while decreasing operator workload.
    Stefanidis D; Wang F; Korndorffer JR; Dunne JB; Scott DJ
    Surg Endosc; 2010 Feb; 24(2):377-82. PubMed ID: 19536599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of validity evidence for the RobotiX robot assisted surgery simulator on advanced suturing tasks.
    Leijte E; de Blaauw I; Rosman C; Botden SMBI
    BMC Surg; 2020 Aug; 20(1):183. PubMed ID: 32787831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is a robotic system really better than the three-dimensional laparoscopic system in terms of suturing performance?: comparison among operators with different levels of experience.
    Park YS; Oo AM; Son SY; Shin DJ; Jung DH; Ahn SH; Park DJ; Kim HH
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1485-90. PubMed ID: 26139502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of a virtual intracorporeal suturing simulator.
    Fu Y; Cavuoto L; Qi D; Panneerselvam K; Yang G; Artikala VS; Enquobahrie A; De S; Schwaitzberg SD
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Aug; 33(8):2468-2472. PubMed ID: 30334151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robot assisted versus laparoscopic suturing learning curve in a simulated setting.
    Leijte E; de Blaauw I; Van Workum F; Rosman C; Botden S
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3679-3689. PubMed ID: 31754849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endoscopic surgery suturing techniques: a randomized study on learning.
    Voskens FJ; van der Schans EM; Ruurda JP; Broeders IAMJ
    BMC Surg; 2022 Feb; 22(1):59. PubMed ID: 35172810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correcting the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery "Illusion of Validity" in Laparoscopic Vaginal Cuff Suturing.
    Leon MG; Dinh TA; Heckman MG; Weaver SE; Chase LA; DeStephano CC
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 28(11):1927-1934. PubMed ID: 34010696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do laparoscopic skills transfer to robotic surgery?
    Panait L; Shetty S; Shewokis PA; Sanchez JA
    J Surg Res; 2014 Mar; 187(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 24189181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Training improves laparoscopic tasks performance and decreases operator workload.
    Hu JS; Lu J; Tan WB; Lomanto D
    Surg Endosc; 2016 May; 30(5):1742-6. PubMed ID: 26173550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Initial experience using a robotic-driven laparoscopic needle holder with ergonomic handle: assessment of surgeons' task performance and ergonomics.
    Sánchez-Margallo JA; Sánchez-Margallo FM
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Dec; 12(12):2069-2077. PubMed ID: 28695479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Construct and face validity and task workload for laparoscopic camera navigation: virtual reality versus videotrainer systems at the SAGES Learning Center.
    Stefanidis D; Haluck R; Pham T; Dunne JB; Reinke T; Markley S; Korndorffer JR; Arellano P; Jones DB; Scott DJ
    Surg Endosc; 2007 Jul; 21(7):1158-64. PubMed ID: 17149551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS™) versus standard laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of performance using a surgical simulator.
    Santos BF; Enter D; Soper NJ; Hungness ES
    Surg Endosc; 2011 Feb; 25(2):483-90. PubMed ID: 20585958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computer-based laparoscopic and robotic surgical simulators: performance characteristics and perceptions of new users.
    Lin DW; Romanelli JR; Kuhn JN; Thompson RE; Bush RW; Seymour NE
    Surg Endosc; 2009 Jan; 23(1):209-14. PubMed ID: 18297349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Task performance in standard laparoscopy in comparison with single-incision laparoscopy in a modified skills trainer.
    Wright AS; Khandelwal S
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Aug; 30(8):3591-7. PubMed ID: 26823059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices.
    Chandra V; Nehra D; Parent R; Woo R; Reyes R; Hernandez-Boussard T; Dutta S
    Surgery; 2010 Jun; 147(6):830-9. PubMed ID: 20045162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotic Assistance Confers Ambidexterity to Laparoscopic Surgeons.
    Choussein S; Srouji SS; Farland LV; Wietsma A; Missmer SA; Hollis M; Yu RN; Pozner CN; Gargiulo AR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 28734971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Value of the SAGES Learning Center in introducing new technology.
    Hanly EJ; Zand J; Bachman SL; Marohn MR; Talamini MA
    Surg Endosc; 2005 Apr; 19(4):477-83. PubMed ID: 15696360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve?
    Yohannes P; Rotariu P; Pinto P; Smith AD; Lee BR
    Urology; 2002 Jul; 60(1):39-45; discussion 45. PubMed ID: 12100918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) in vivo suturing using a magnetic anchoring and guidance system (MAGS) camera in a porcine model: impact on ergonomics and workload.
    Yin G; Han WK; Faddegon S; Tan YK; Liu ZW; Olweny EO; Scott DJ; Cadeddu JA
    Urology; 2013 Jan; 81(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 23153954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.