These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21184116)

  • 1. Consensus statement on the adoption of the COPE guidelines.
    Surgery Journal Editors Group
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2011 Jan; 18(1):125-6. PubMed ID: 21184116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Consensus statement on the adoption of the COPE guidelines.
    Surgery Journal Editors Group (SJEG)
    Pediatr Surg Int; 2010 Jul; 26(7):767-8. PubMed ID: 20559791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consensus Statement on the Adoption of the COPE Guidelines.
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2010 Jul; 14(7):1067-8. PubMed ID: 20521120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consensus statement on the adoption of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines.
    J Surg Educ; 2010; 67(4):274. PubMed ID: 20816368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consensus statement on the adoption of the COPE guidelines.
    Surgery Journal Editors Group (SJEG)
    J Surg Res; 2010 Jul; 162(1):45. PubMed ID: 20541657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consensus statement on the adoption of the COPE guidelines.
    Surgery Journal Editors Group
    Am J Surg; 2010 Jul; 200(1):1. PubMed ID: 20637330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consensus statement on the adoption of the COPE guidelines.
    Surgery Journal Editors Group
    Nutrition; 2010 Sep; 26(9):855. PubMed ID: 20692597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Consensus statement on the adoption of the COPE guidelines.
    Surgery Journal Editors Group (SJEG)
    World J Surg; 2010 Jul; 34(7):1399-400. PubMed ID: 20422189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Publication ethics: redundancy in publication.
    Black RA
    Med Eng Phys; 2013 Apr; 35(4):421. PubMed ID: 23582765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Goals of ethics consultation: toward clarity, utility, and fidelity.
    Andre J
    J Clin Ethics; 1997; 8(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 9302639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An ongoing conversation: the Task Force report and bioethics consultation.
    Aulisio MP; Arnold RM; Youngner SJ
    J Clin Ethics; 1999; 10(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 11645165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Confidentiality and research.
    Squires BP
    CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(9):1299. PubMed ID: 11654014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Journal publication ethics 201: culture in crisis?
    Berquist TH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Mar; 194(3):553. PubMed ID: 20198741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Publication ethics: a collective responsibility.
    Perry MW; Mittelmark MB
    Promot Educ; 2008 Sep; 15(3):3-4, 44-5, 50-1. PubMed ID: 18784045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Divided loyalties: an anthology of conflict of interest duties.
    National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (Canada). Office
    NCBHR Commun; 1995; 6(2):11-6. PubMed ID: 11654610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Helsinki Declaration: proposed revision.
    Schüklenk U
    Bull Med Ethics; 1999 Jul; No. 149():2. PubMed ID: 11657800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Developing a Tri-Council code of conduct for research involving humans.
    Rolleston F; Armour C; Stipich N
    J Int Bioethique; 1997; 8(1-2):67-70. PubMed ID: 11655381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating ethics committees: a view from the outside.
    Hoffmann DE
    Milbank Q; 1993; 71(4):677-701. PubMed ID: 8246852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [To lead by example and emulation among other editorial boards, officials of the newspaper should they be more explicit about the bioethical values they recommend to their authors and their reviewers to consider?].
    Watine J
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2011; 69(5):615-7. PubMed ID: 22034669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Time to clarify guidelines for researchers and IRBs in medical education research.
    Fiebach NH
    Acad Med; 2010 Oct; 85(10):1549. PubMed ID: 20881668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.