These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

558 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21185151)

  • 21. Asymmetric mandibular prognathism: outcome, stability and patient satisfaction after BSSO surgery. A retrospective study.
    Hågensli N; Stenvik A; Espeland L
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1735-41. PubMed ID: 25175078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Changes in bite force and dentoskeletal morphology in prognathic patients after orthognathic surgery.
    Harada K; Kikuchi T; Morishima S; Sato M; Ohkura K; Omura K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Jun; 95(6):649-54. PubMed ID: 12789142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Hard and soft tissue stability of orthognathic surgery.
    Kitahara T; Nakasima A; Kurahara S; Shiratsuchi Y
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Jan; 79(1):158-65. PubMed ID: 19123720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Extraoral vertical subcondylar osteotomy with rigid fixation for correction of mandibular prognathism. Comparison with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and surgical technique.
    Hågensli N; Stenvik A; Espeland L
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Apr; 41(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 23102564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Recovery pattern of mandibular movement by active physical therapy after bilateral transoral vertical ramus osteotomy.
    Jung HD; Jung YS; Park JH; Park HS
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 70(7):e431-7. PubMed ID: 22698299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Factors affecting neurosensory disturbance after mandibular bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.
    Ylikontiola L; Kinnunen J; Oikarinen K
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Nov; 58(11):1234-9; discussion 1239-40. PubMed ID: 11078134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessment of the relationship between the recovery of maximum mandibular opening and the maxillomandibular fixation period after orthognathic surgery.
    Ueki K; Marukawa K; Hashiba Y; Nakagawa K; Degerliyurt K; Yamamoto E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 66(3):486-91. PubMed ID: 18280381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery.
    Brasileiro BF; Grempel RG; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):809-17. PubMed ID: 19304039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bite force, occlusal contact area and masticatory efficiency before and after orthognathic surgical correction of mandibular prognathism.
    Iwase M; Ohashi M; Tachibana H; Toyoshima T; Nagumo M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Dec; 35(12):1102-7. PubMed ID: 17097270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stability after surgical-orthodontic correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion. I. Mandibular setback.
    Proffit WR; Phillips C; Dann C; Turvey TA
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1991; 6(1):7-18. PubMed ID: 1940541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of rigid fixation on orthodontic finishing after mandibular bilateral sagittal split setback: the case for miniplate monocortical fixation.
    Cho HJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):e310-21. PubMed ID: 22197006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Modification of the sagittal split osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: mobilizing vertical osteotomy of the internal ramus segment.
    Ricard D; Ferri J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1691-9. PubMed ID: 19615584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures.
    Costa F; Robiony M; Sembronio S; Polini F; Politi M
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(3):179-92. PubMed ID: 12387609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Biomechanical evaluation of a T-shaped miniplate fixation of a modified sagittal split ramus osteotomy with buccal step, a new technique for mandibular orthognathic surgery.
    Aymach Z; Nei H; Kawamura H; Bell W
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Jan; 111(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 20580286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Vertical ramus versus sagittal split osteotomies: comparison of stability after mandibular setback.
    Yoshioka I; Khanal A; Tominaga K; Horie A; Furuta N; Fukuda J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jun; 66(6):1138-44. PubMed ID: 18486778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Condylar resorption and functional outcome after unilateral sagittal split osteotomy.
    Wohlwender I; Daake G; Weingart D; Brandstätter A; Kessler P; Lethaus B
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Sep; 112(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 21292514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Resorbable versus titanium osteosynthesis devices in bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy of the mandible - the results of a two centre randomised clinical study with an eight-year follow-up.
    Stockmann P; Böhm H; Driemel O; Mühling J; Pistner H
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Oct; 38(7):522-8. PubMed ID: 20338772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Neurosensory alteration in the lower lip and chin area after orthognathic surgery: bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus inverted L ramus osteotomy.
    Kobayashi A; Yoshimasu H; Kobayashi J; Amagasa T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 May; 64(5):778-84. PubMed ID: 16631484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of alveolar nerve function after surgical lengthening of the mandible by a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy or distraction osteogenesis.
    Baas EM; de Lange J; Horsthuis RB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jun; 39(6):529-33. PubMed ID: 20430586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Risk factors for neurosensory disturbance after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy based on position of mandibular canal and morphology of mandibular angle.
    Yamauchi K; Takahashi T; Kaneuji T; Nogami S; Yamamoto N; Miyamoto I; Yamashita Y
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):401-6. PubMed ID: 21549489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.