These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21185548)

  • 1. Target-flanker discriminability affects conflict size but not sustained suppression.
    Zeischka P; Coomans D; Deroost N; Vandenbossche J; Soetens E
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jan; 136(1):148-56. PubMed ID: 21185548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Now you see it, now you don't: controlling for contingencies and stimulus repetitions eliminates the Gratton effect.
    Schmidt JR; De Houwer J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):176-86. PubMed ID: 21745649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cognitive control: dynamic, sustained, and voluntary influences.
    Fernandez-Duque D; Knight M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):340-55. PubMed ID: 18377175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conflict adaptation depends on task structure.
    Akçay C; Hazeltine E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):958-73. PubMed ID: 18665738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modulation of the error-related negativity by response conflict.
    Danielmeier C; Wessel JR; Steinhauser M; Ullsperger M
    Psychophysiology; 2009 Nov; 46(6):1288-98. PubMed ID: 19572907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing the attention shift hypothesis as an account for the flanker sequence-based congruency modulation in spatial flanker tasks.
    Zeischka P; Deroost N; Henderickx D; Soetens E
    Am J Psychol; 2010; 123(3):337-51. PubMed ID: 20923086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does response interference depend on the subjective visibility of flanker distractors?
    Maniscalco B; Bang JW; Iravani L; Camps-Febrer F; Lau H
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):841-51. PubMed ID: 22477057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ad-hoc and context-dependent adjustments of selective attention in conflict control: an ERP study with visual probes.
    Nigbur R; Schneider J; Sommer W; Dimigen O; Stürmer B
    Neuroimage; 2015 Feb; 107():76-84. PubMed ID: 25482266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Processing multidimensional objects under different perceptual loads: the priority of bottom-up perceptual saliency.
    Wei P; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1114(1):113-24. PubMed ID: 16935270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The dynamics of cognitive control: evidence for within-trial conflict adaptation from frequency-tagged EEG.
    Scherbaum S; Fischer R; Dshemuchadse M; Goschke T
    Psychophysiology; 2011 May; 48(5):591-600. PubMed ID: 21044093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distinguishing response conflict and task conflict in the Stroop task: evidence from ex-Gaussian distribution analysis.
    Steinhauser M; Hübner R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1398-412. PubMed ID: 19803645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sustained suppression in congruency tasks.
    Notebaert W; Soetens E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Jan; 59(1):178-89. PubMed ID: 16556566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sustained vs. transient cognitive control: evidence of a behavioral dissociation.
    Funes MJ; Lupiáñez J; Humphreys G
    Cognition; 2010 Mar; 114(3):338-47. PubMed ID: 19962136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The interaction of task-relevant and task-irrelevant stimulus features in the number/size congruency paradigm: an ERP study.
    Szucs D; Soltész F
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1190():143-58. PubMed ID: 18076868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Strategies of flanker coprocessing in single and dual tasks.
    Hübner R; Lehle C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):103-23. PubMed ID: 17311482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Congruency sequence effect without feature integration and contingency learning.
    Kim S; Cho YS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jun; 149():60-8. PubMed ID: 24704781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of spatial distribution of attention during inhibition of return (IOR) on flanker interference in hearing and congenitally deaf people.
    Chen Q; Zhang M; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2006 Sep; 1109(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 16859649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of inverting natural stimuli in a flanker task.
    Wells IC; Hamm JP
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Mar; 63(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 19271814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The conflict adaptation is affected by attentional strategies: evidence from the arrow flanker task.
    Chen J; Li C; He C; Chen A
    Sci China C Life Sci; 2009 Oct; 52(10):990-4. PubMed ID: 19911137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hypnotic suggestion modulates cognitive conflict: the case of the flanker compatibility effect.
    Iani C; Ricci F; Gherri E; Rubichi S
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Aug; 17(8):721-7. PubMed ID: 16913956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.