These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21186096)

  • 21. Pathological assessment of patients' speech signals using nonlinear dynamical analysis.
    Vaziri G; Almasganj F; Behroozmand R
    Comput Biol Med; 2010 Jan; 40(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 19962694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Objective assessment of pediatric voice disorders with the acoustic voice quality index.
    Reynolds V; Buckland A; Bailey J; Lipscombe J; Nathan E; Vijayasekaran S; Kelly R; Maryn Y; French N
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):672.e1-7. PubMed ID: 22632794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Impact of laryngeal findings on acoustic parameters of patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux.
    Akyildiz S; Ogut F; Varis A; Kirazli T; Bor S
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2012; 74(4):215-9. PubMed ID: 22890297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Optimal selection of wavelet-packet-based features using genetic algorithm in pathological assessment of patients' speech signal with unilateral vocal fold paralysis.
    Behroozmand R; Almasganj F
    Comput Biol Med; 2007 Apr; 37(4):474-85. PubMed ID: 17034780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Predicting variations of perceptual performance across individuals from neural activity using pattern classifiers.
    Das K; Giesbrecht B; Eckstein MP
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jul; 51(4):1425-37. PubMed ID: 20302949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Acoustic analysis of voice in Huntington's disease patients.
    Velasco García MJ; Cobeta I; Martín G; Alonso-Navarro H; Jimenez-Jimenez FJ
    J Voice; 2011 Mar; 25(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 20137889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Urinary nucleosides based potential biomarker selection by support vector machine for bladder cancer recognition.
    Mao Y; Zhao X; Wang S; Cheng Y
    Anal Chim Acta; 2007 Aug; 598(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 17693304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Voice Disorder Detection via an m-Health System: Design and Results of a Clinical Study to Evaluate Vox4Health.
    Cesari U; De Pietro G; Marciano E; Niri C; Sannino G; Verde L
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():8193694. PubMed ID: 30175144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Cardiac arrhythmia classification based on multi-features and support vector machines].
    Zhao Y; Hong W; Sun S
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Apr; 28(2):292-5. PubMed ID: 21604488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effectiveness of the glottal to noise excitation ratio for the screening of voice disorders.
    Godino-Llorente JI; Osma-Ruiz V; Sáenz-Lechón N; Gómez-Vilda P; Blanco-Velasco M; Cruz-Roldán F
    J Voice; 2010 Jan; 24(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 19135854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. On combining information from modulation spectra and mel-frequency cepstral coefficients for automatic detection of pathological voices.
    Arias-Londoño JD; Godino-Llorente JI; Markaki M; Stylianou Y
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Jul; 36(2):60-9. PubMed ID: 21073260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Optimal feature selection for the assessment of vocal fold disorders.
    Khadivi Heris H; Seyed Aghazadeh B; Nikkhah-Bahrami M
    Comput Biol Med; 2009 Oct; 39(10):860-8. PubMed ID: 19665112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Assessment of voice acoustic parameters in female teachers with diagnosed occupational voice disorders].
    Niebudek-Bogusz E; Fiszer M; Sliwińska-Kowalska M
    Med Pr; 2005; 56(6):431-8. PubMed ID: 16613367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Support vector wavelet adaptation for pathological voice assessment.
    Saeedi NE; Almasganj F; Torabinejad F
    Comput Biol Med; 2011 Sep; 41(9):822-8. PubMed ID: 21777911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of different feature extraction methods for diagnosis of valvular heart diseases using PCG signals.
    Rouhani M; Abdoli R
    J Med Eng Technol; 2012 Jan; 36(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 22149293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Ultrasonographic feature selection and pattern classification for cervical lymph nodes using support vector machines.
    Zhang J; Wang Y; Dong Y; Wang Y
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2007 Oct; 88(1):75-84. PubMed ID: 17719122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Brain tumor classification based on long echo proton MRS signals.
    Lukas L; Devos A; Suykens JA; Vanhamme L; Howe FA; Majós C; Moreno-Torres A; Van der Graaf M; Tate AR; Arús C; Van Huffel S
    Artif Intell Med; 2004 May; 31(1):73-89. PubMed ID: 15182848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Application of irregular and unbalanced data to predict diabetic nephropathy using visualization and feature selection methods.
    Cho BH; Yu H; Kim KW; Kim TH; Kim IY; Kim SI
    Artif Intell Med; 2008 Jan; 42(1):37-53. PubMed ID: 17997291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of machine learning and traditional classifiers in glaucoma diagnosis.
    Chan K; Lee TW; Sample PA; Goldbaum MH; Weinreb RN; Sejnowski TJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):963-74. PubMed ID: 12214886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Automatic intelligibility assessment of speakers after laryngeal cancer by means of acoustic modeling.
    Bocklet T; Riedhammer K; Nöth E; Eysholdt U; Haderlein T
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):390-7. PubMed ID: 21820272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.