These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21186735)

  • 1. Effects of working memory load and repeated scenario exposure on emergency braking performance.
    Engström J; Aust ML; Viström M
    Hum Factors; 2010 Oct; 52(5):551-9. PubMed ID: 21186735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experimal study of young male drivers' responses to vehicle collision using EMG of lower extremity.
    Gao Z; Li C; Hu H; Zhao H; Chen C; Yu H
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S563-73. PubMed ID: 26406050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of drivers' deceleration behavior based on naturalistic driving data.
    Li S; Li P; Yao Y; Han X; Xu Y; Chen L
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(1):42-47. PubMed ID: 31986072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Situational influences on response time and maneuver choice: Development of time-critical scenarios.
    Powelleit M; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jan; 122():48-62. PubMed ID: 30308330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of additional tasks on the reaction time of braking responses in simulated car driving: beyond the PRP effect.
    Stojan R; Bock O; Mack M; Voelcker-Rehage C
    Psychol Res; 2024 Oct; 88(7):2096-2106. PubMed ID: 38914809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Looking for an optimal pedal layout to improve the driving performance of patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
    Ma S; Wu C; Zhang J; Zeng X; Zhao G; Sun X
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Oct; 80():43-49. PubMed ID: 31280809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of memory rehearsal on driver performance: experiment and theoretical account.
    Salvucci DD; Beltowska J
    Hum Factors; 2008 Oct; 50(5):834-44. PubMed ID: 19110843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of the intensity of wireless telephone conversations on reaction time in a braking response.
    Irwin M; Fitzgerald C; Berg WP
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Jun; 90(3 Pt 2):1130-4. PubMed ID: 10939058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Immobilisation of the knee and ankle and its impact on drivers' braking times: a driving simulator study.
    Waton A; Kakwani R; Cooke NJ; Litchfield D; Kok D; Middleton H; Irwin L
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Jul; 93(7):928-31. PubMed ID: 21705565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. I want to brake free: The effect of connected vehicle features on driver behaviour, usability and acceptance.
    Payre W; Diels C
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Jan; 82():102932. PubMed ID: 31445460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of an occlusion-induced delay on braking behavior in critical situations: A driving simulator study.
    de Winter JCF; Saffarian M; Senders JW
    Hum Factors; 2023 Nov; 65(7):1336-1344. PubMed ID: 35620977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of orthopaedic immobilization of the right lower limb on driving performance: an experimental study during simulated driving by healthy volunteers.
    Tremblay MA; Corriveau H; Boissy P; Smeesters C; Hamel M; Murray JC; Cabana F
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Dec; 91(12):2860-6. PubMed ID: 19952248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bipedal vs. unipedal: a comparison between one-foot and two-foot driving in a driving simulator.
    Wang DD; Richard FD; Cino CR; Blount T; Schmuller J
    Ergonomics; 2017 Apr; 60(4):553-562. PubMed ID: 27210894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Definition of simulated driving tests for the evaluation of drivers' reactions and responses.
    Bartolozzi R; Frendo F
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(3):302-9. PubMed ID: 24372503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of working memory in supporting drivers' situation awareness for surrounding traffic.
    Johannsdottir KR; Herdman CM
    Hum Factors; 2010 Dec; 52(6):663-73. PubMed ID: 21284368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a sudden brake warning system: effect on the response time of the following driver.
    Isler RB; Starkey NJ
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Jul; 41(4):569-76. PubMed ID: 20034608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of cellular telephone conversations and other potential interference on reaction time in a braking response.
    Consiglio W; Driscoll P; Witte M; Berg WP
    Accid Anal Prev; 2003 Jul; 35(4):495-500. PubMed ID: 12729813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An experimental study on the effect of mobile phone conversation on drivers' reaction time in braking response.
    Al-Darrab IA; Khan ZA; Ishrat SI
    J Safety Res; 2009; 40(3):185-9. PubMed ID: 19527811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Time headway in car following and operational performance during unexpected braking.
    van Winsum W; Brouwer W
    Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Jun; 84(3 Pt 2):1247-57. PubMed ID: 9229443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Emergency braking is affected by the use of cruise control.
    Jammes Y; Behr M; Llari M; Bonicel S; Weber JP; Berdah S
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Aug; 18(6):636-641. PubMed ID: 28118033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.