188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21186898)
1. Simulation of a chain of collapsible contracting lymphangions with progressive valve closure.
Bertram CD; Macaskill C; Moore JE
J Biomech Eng; 2011 Jan; 133(1):011008. PubMed ID: 21186898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Consequences of intravascular lymphatic valve properties: a study of contraction timing in a multi-lymphangion model.
Bertram CD; Macaskill C; Davis MJ; Moore JE
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2016 Apr; 310(7):H847-60. PubMed ID: 26747501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Parameter sensitivity analysis of a lumped-parameter model of a chain of lymphangions in series.
Jamalian S; Bertram CD; Richardson WJ; Moore JE
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2013 Dec; 305(12):H1709-17. PubMed ID: 24124185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Lymphatic Vascular System: Does Nonuniform Lymphangion Length Limit Flow-Rate?
Bertram CD
J Biomech Eng; 2024 Sep; 146(9):. PubMed ID: 38558115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. First-order approximation for the pressure-flow relationship of spontaneously contracting lymphangions.
Quick CM; Venugopal AM; Dongaonkar RM; Laine GA; Stewart RH
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2008 May; 294(5):H2144-9. PubMed ID: 18326809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lymphangion coordination minimally affects mean flow in lymphatic vessels.
Venugopal AM; Stewart RH; Laine GA; Dongaonkar RM; Quick CM
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2007 Aug; 293(2):H1183-9. PubMed ID: 17468331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nonlinear lymphangion pressure-volume relationship minimizes edema.
Venugopal AM; Stewart RH; Laine GA; Quick CM
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2010 Sep; 299(3):H876-82. PubMed ID: 20601461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pump efficacy in a two-dimensional, fluid-structure interaction model of a chain of contracting lymphangions.
Elich H; Barrett A; Shankar V; Fogelson AL
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2021 Oct; 20(5):1941-1968. PubMed ID: 34275062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Network Scale Modeling of Lymph Transport and Its Effective Pumping Parameters.
Jamalian S; Davis MJ; Zawieja DC; Moore JE
PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148384. PubMed ID: 26845031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The relationship between lymphangion chain length and maximum pressure generation established through in vivo imaging and computational modeling.
Razavi MS; Nelson TS; Nepiyushchikh Z; Gleason RL; Dixon JB
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2017 Dec; 313(6):H1249-H1260. PubMed ID: 28778909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contraction of collecting lymphatics: organization of pressure-dependent rate for multiple lymphangions.
Bertram CD; Macaskill C; Davis MJ; Moore JE
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2018 Oct; 17(5):1513-1532. PubMed ID: 29948540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A one-dimensional mathematical model of collecting lymphatics coupled with an electro-fluid-mechanical contraction model and valve dynamics.
Contarino C; Toro EF
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2018 Dec; 17(6):1687-1714. PubMed ID: 30006745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Passive pressure-diameter relationship and structural composition of rat mesenteric lymphangions.
Rahbar E; Weimer J; Gibbs H; Yeh AT; Bertram CD; Davis MJ; Hill MA; Zawieja DC; Moore JE
Lymphat Res Biol; 2012 Dec; 10(4):152-63. PubMed ID: 23145980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Valve-related modes of pump failure in collecting lymphatics: numerical and experimental investigation.
Bertram CD; Macaskill C; Davis MJ; Moore JE
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2017 Dec; 16(6):1987-2003. PubMed ID: 28699120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimal postnodal lymphatic network structure that maximizes active propulsion of lymph.
Venugopal AM; Quick CM; Laine GA; Stewart RH
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2009 Feb; 296(2):H303-9. PubMed ID: 19028799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lymphatic pump-conduit duality: contraction of postnodal lymphatic vessels inhibits passive flow.
Quick CM; Ngo BL; Venugopal AM; Stewart RH
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2009 Mar; 296(3):H662-8. PubMed ID: 19122167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modeling flow in collecting lymphatic vessels: one-dimensional flow through a series of contractile elements.
Macdonald AJ; Arkill KP; Tabor GR; McHale NG; Winlove CP
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2008 Jul; 295(1):H305-13. PubMed ID: 18487438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of valve leaflet mechanics on lymphatic pumping assessed using numerical simulations.
Li H; Mei Y; Maimon N; Padera TP; Baish JW; Munn LL
Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):10649. PubMed ID: 31337769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of a model of a multi-lymphangion lymphatic vessel incorporating realistic and measured parameter values.
Bertram CD; Macaskill C; Davis MJ; Moore JE
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2014 Apr; 13(2):401-16. PubMed ID: 23801424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modelling secondary lymphatic valves with a flexible vessel wall: how geometry and material properties combine to provide function.
Bertram CD
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2020 Dec; 19(6):2081-2098. PubMed ID: 32303880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
