98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21186901)
1. Intrasac pressure changes and vascular remodeling after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: review and biomechanical model simulation.
Kwon ST; Rectenwald JE; Baek S
J Biomech Eng; 2011 Jan; 133(1):011011. PubMed ID: 21186901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intrasac pressure waveforms after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) are a reliable marker of type I endoleaks, but not type II or combined types: an experimental study.
Chaudhuri A; Ansdell LE; Grass AJ; Adiseshiah M
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2004 Oct; 28(4):373-8. PubMed ID: 15350558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Abdominal aortic aneurysm sac shrinkage after endovascular aneurysm repair: correlation with chronic sac pressure measurement.
Ellozy SH; Carroccio A; Lookstein RA; Jacobs TS; Addis MD; Teodorescu VJ; Marin ML
J Vasc Surg; 2006 Jan; 43(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 16414379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computational analysis of type II endoleaks in a stented abdominal aortic aneurysm model.
Li Z; Kleinstreuer C
J Biomech; 2006; 39(14):2573-82. PubMed ID: 16221475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simulation of abdominal aortic aneurysm growth with updating hemodynamic loads using a realistic geometry.
Sheidaei A; Hunley SC; Zeinali-Davarani S; Raguin LG; Baek S
Med Eng Phys; 2011 Jan; 33(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 20961796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Porohyperelastic finite element modeling of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Ayyalasomayajula A; Vande Geest JP; Simon BR
J Biomech Eng; 2010 Oct; 132(10):104502. PubMed ID: 20887020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of endoleak significance after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a lumped parameter model.
Wolters BJ; Emmer M; Rutten MC; Schurink GW; van de Vosse FN
Med Eng Phys; 2007 Dec; 29(10):1106-18. PubMed ID: 17197229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computational analysis of biomechanical contributors to possible endovascular graft failure.
Li Z; Kleinstreuer C; Farber M
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2005 Dec; 4(4):221-34. PubMed ID: 16270200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Aneurysm sac shrinkage after endovascular treatment of the aorta: beyond sac pressure and endoleaks.
Georgakarakos E; Georgiadis GS; Ioannou CV; Kapoulas KC; Trellopoulos G; Lazarides M
Vasc Med; 2012 Jun; 17(3):168-73. PubMed ID: 22402935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Blood flow and structure interactions in a stented abdominal aortic aneurysm model.
Li Z; Kleinstreuer C
Med Eng Phys; 2005 Jun; 27(5):369-82. PubMed ID: 15863346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in high risk patients: outcomes of management.
Mutirangura P; Kruatrachue C; Ophasanond P; Chaiyasoot W; Ruangsetakit C; Wongwanit C; Siriapisith T; Sermsathanasawadi N; Chinsakchai K; Phongraweewan O
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Oct; 90(10):2080-9. PubMed ID: 18041427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving results of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair at a low-volume hospital by risk-adjusted selection of treatment in the endovascular era.
Wibmer A; Meyer B; Albrecht T; Buhr HJ; Kruschewski M
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2009 Sep; 32(5):918-22. PubMed ID: 19296161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized clinical trials of endovascular repair versus surveillance for treatment of small abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Ouriel K
J Endovasc Ther; 2009 Feb; 16 Suppl 1():I94-105. PubMed ID: 19317579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm--a challenge to open repair? Results of a single centre experience in 20 patients.
Hinchliffe RJ; Yusuf SW; Macierewicz JA; MacSweeney ST; Wenham PW; Hopkinson BR
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2001 Dec; 22(6):528-34. PubMed ID: 11735202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Endovascular repair vs open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: comparative utilization trends from 2001 to 2006.
Levin DC; Rao VM; Parker L; Frangos AJ; Sunshine JH
J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Jul; 6(7):506-9. PubMed ID: 19560067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measure what matters: institutional outcome data are superior to the use of surrogate markers to define "center of excellence" for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
Goshima KR; Mills JL; Awari K; Pike SL; Hughes JD
Ann Vasc Surg; 2008; 22(3):328-34. PubMed ID: 18411029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Randomized EVAR trials and advent of level i evidence: a paradigm shift in management of large abdominal aortic aneurysms?
Rutherford RB
Semin Vasc Surg; 2006 Jun; 19(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 16782510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Endovascular management of abdominal aortic aneurysm].
Krasiński Z; Staniszewski R; Juszkat R; Woo EY; Majewski W
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2006 Jan; 20(115):88-92. PubMed ID: 16617745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A patient-specific computational model of fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Wolters BJ; Rutten MC; Schurink GW; Kose U; de Hart J; van de Vosse FN
Med Eng Phys; 2005 Dec; 27(10):871-83. PubMed ID: 16157501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A biomechanics-based rupture potential index for abdominal aortic aneurysm risk assessment: demonstrative application.
Vande Geest JP; Di Martino ES; Bohra A; Makaroun MS; Vorp DA
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2006 Nov; 1085():11-21. PubMed ID: 17182918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
