259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21187775)
1. Accurate facial morphologic measurements using a 3-camera photogrammetric method.
Deli R; Gioia ED; Galantucci LM; Percoco G
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 22(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 21187775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated landmark extraction for orthodontic measurement of faces using the 3-camera photogrammetry methodology.
Deli R; Di Gioia E; Galantucci LM; Percoco G
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 21(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 20072024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Method selection in craniofacial measurements: advantages and disadvantages of 3D digitization method.
Ozsoy U; Demirel BM; Yildirim FB; Tosun O; Sarikcioglu L
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 37(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 19179087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Assessment of precision and accuracy of digital surface photogrammetry with the DSP 400 system].
Krimmel M; Kluba S; Dietz K; Reinert S
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Mar; 50(3):45-53. PubMed ID: 15832575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity and reliability of craniofacial anthropometric measurement of 3D digital photogrammetric images.
Wong JY; Oh AK; Ohta E; Hunt AT; Rogers GF; Mulliken JB; Deutsch CK
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2008 May; 45(3):232-9. PubMed ID: 18452351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of three methods of facial measurement.
Ghoddousi H; Edler R; Haers P; Wertheim D; Greenhill D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 36(3):250-8. PubMed ID: 17113754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Precision and accuracy of the 3dMD photogrammetric system in craniomaxillofacial application.
Lübbers HT; Medinger L; Kruse A; Grätz KW; Matthews F
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):763-7. PubMed ID: 20485043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A photographic system for the three-dimensional study of facial morphology.
de Menezes M; Rosati R; Allievi C; Sforza C
Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1070-7. PubMed ID: 19852596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Noninvasive computerized scanning method for the correlation between the facial soft and hard tissues for an integrated three-dimensional anthropometry and cephalometry.
Galantucci LM; Percoco G; Lavecchia F; Di Gioia E
J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):797-804. PubMed ID: 23714883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of facial soft tissue measurements on three-dimensional images and models obtained with different methods.
Germec-Cakan D; Canter HI; Nur B; Arun T
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Sep; 21(5):1393-9. PubMed ID: 20856027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: evaluation of anthropometric precision and accuracy using a Genex 3D camera system.
Weinberg SM; Scott NM; Neiswanger K; Brandon CA; Marazita ML
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2004 Sep; 41(5):507-18. PubMed ID: 15352857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Design, construction, and testing of a stereo-photogrammetric tool for the diagnosis of fetal alcohol syndrome in infants.
Mutsvangwa TE; Smit J; Hoyme HE; Kalberg W; Viljoen DL; Meintjes EM; Douglas TS
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Sep; 28(9):1448-58. PubMed ID: 19336298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional surface imaging of the face.
Hatcher DC; Dial C
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2009 Mar; 37(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 19830985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of a vision-based, three-dimensional facial imaging system.
Ayoub A; Garrahy A; Hood C; White J; Bock M; Siebert JP; Spencer R; Ray A
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2003 Sep; 40(5):523-9. PubMed ID: 12943434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of involuntary facial movements on craniofacial anthropometry: a survey using a three-dimensional photographic system.
Lübbers HT; Medinger L; Kruse AL; Grätz KW; Obwegeser JA; Matthews F
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Mar; 50(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 21236527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional facial morphometry and conventional cephalometrics: a correlation study.
Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Puleo A; Poggio CE; Schmitz JH
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996; 11(4):329-38. PubMed ID: 9456609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults.
Malkoç S; Demir A; Uysal T; Canbuldu N
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 19064675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison study of different facial soft tissue analysis methods.
Kook MS; Jung S; Park HJ; Oh HK; Ryu SY; Cho JH; Lee JS; Yoon SJ; Kim MS; Shin HK
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):648-56. PubMed ID: 24954528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Registration of 3-dimensional facial photographs for clinical use.
Maal TJ; van Loon B; Plooij JM; Rangel F; Ettema AM; Borstlap WA; Bergé SJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Oct; 68(10):2391-401. PubMed ID: 20708318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The development and application of computer assisted photogrammetric-system of facial soft tissue running under multiple facilities for taking image].
Bao B; Yu S; Tan J
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1997 Aug; 15(3):263-5. PubMed ID: 11480017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
