259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21187775)
41. Digital surface photogrammetry for anthropometric analysis of the cleft infant face.
Krimmel M; Kluba S; Bacher M; Dietz K; Reinert S
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2006 May; 43(3):350-5. PubMed ID: 16681408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Measurement of 3-D facial contours for the design of half-face respirators.
Yatapanage KG; Post K
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1992 Jan; 53(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 1590217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Evaluation of reproducibility and reliability of 3D soft tissue analysis using 3D stereophotogrammetry.
Plooij JM; Swennen GR; Rangel FA; Maal TJ; Schutyser FA; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Bergé SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 38(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 19167191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Evaluation of a CCD-based facial measurement system.
Deacon AT; Anthony AG; Bhatia SN; Muller JP
Med Inform (Lond); 1991; 16(2):213-28. PubMed ID: 1921564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Computerized photogrammetry used to calculate the brow position index.
Naif-de-Andrade NT; Hochman B; Naif-de-Andrade CZ; Ferreira LM
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Oct; 36(5):1047-51. PubMed ID: 22936380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Distances between facial landmarks can be measured accurately with a new digital 3-dimensional video system.
Schimmel M; Christou P; Houstis O; Herrmann FR; Kiliaridis S; Müller F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):580.e1-580.e10; discussion 580-1. PubMed ID: 20451768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Three-dimensional modeling for modern diagnosis and planning in maxillofacial surgery.
Ayoub AF; Wray D; Moos KF; Siebert P; Jin J; Niblett TB; Urquhart C; Mowforth R
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996; 11(3):225-33. PubMed ID: 9456625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The accuracy of matching three-dimensional photographs with skin surfaces derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
Maal TJ; Plooij JM; Rangel FA; Mollemans W; Schutyser FA; Bergé SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jul; 37(7):641-6. PubMed ID: 18539435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Measuring adult facial morphology in three dimensions.
Kau CH; Richmond S; Savio C; Mallorie C
Angle Orthod; 2006 Sep; 76(5):773-8. PubMed ID: 17029509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Digital two-dimensional photogrammetry: a comparison of three techniques of obtaining digital photographs.
Nechala P; Mahoney J; Farkas LG
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1999 Jun; 103(7):1819-25. PubMed ID: 10359240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [Three-dimensional reconstruction on facial soft tissue using three-dimensional grating projection technique].
Zhu M; Qiu WL; Fang B; Tang YS; Ju LY; Li GY
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2004 Jun; 13(3):173-5. PubMed ID: 15269851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Facial morphology of Finnish children with and without developmental hip dysplasia using 3D facial templates.
Hanis SB; Kau CH; Souccar NM; English JD; Pirttiniemi P; Valkama M; Harila V
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2010 Nov; 13(4):229-37. PubMed ID: 21040466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. A new three-dimensional method of assessing facial volumetric changes after orthognathic treatment.
Hajeer MY; Mao Z; Millett DT; Ayoub AF; Siebert JP
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2005 Mar; 42(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15748101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Three-dimensional facial morphology following surgical repair of unilateral cleft lip and palate in patients after nasoalveolar molding.
Singh GD; Levy-Bercowski D; Yáñez MA; Santiago PE
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2007 Aug; 10(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 17651132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The facial evolution: looking backward and moving forward.
Baynam G; Walters M; Claes P; Kung S; LeSouef P; Dawkins H; Gillett D; Goldblatt J
Hum Mutat; 2013 Jan; 34(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 23033261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [Utility of three-dimensional soft tissue facial morphometry and conventional cephalometrics in people with normal occlusion].
Guo H; Luo S; Bai Y
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Aug; 21(4):314-7. PubMed ID: 14513594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Visualizing three-dimensional facial soft tissue changes following orthognathic surgery.
Miller L; Morris DO; Berry E
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Feb; 29(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 16957060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Three-dimensional anthropometric analysis of chinese faces and its application in evaluating facial deformity.
Dong Y; Zhao Y; Bai S; Wu G; Zhou L; Wang B
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 69(4):1195-206. PubMed ID: 21050632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Precision of three-dimensional stereo-photogrammetry (3dMD™) in anthropometry of the auricle and its application in microtia reconstruction.
Chen ZC; Albdour MN; Lizardo JA; Chen YA; Chen PK
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 May; 68(5):622-31. PubMed ID: 25892285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Facial surface changes after cleft alveolar bone grafting.
Krimmel M; Schuck N; Bacher M; Reinert S
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 69(1):80-3. PubMed ID: 20727646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
