200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21187812)
1. Antimicrobial activity of clinically used antiseptics and wound irrigating agents in combination with wound dressings.
Hirsch T; Limoochi-Deli S; Lahmer A; Jacobsen F; Goertz O; Steinau HU; Seipp HM; Steinstraesser L
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Apr; 127(4):1539-1545. PubMed ID: 21187812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Delivery of antiseptic solutions by a bacterial cellulose wound dressing: Uptake, release and antibacterial efficacy of octenidine and povidone-iodine.
Bernardelli de Mattos I; Nischwitz SP; Tuca AC; Groeber-Becker F; Funk M; Birngruber T; Mautner SI; Kamolz LP; Holzer JCJ
Burns; 2020 Jun; 46(4):918-927. PubMed ID: 31653329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Albumin reduces the antibacterial efficacy of wound antiseptics against Staphylococcus aureus.
Kapalschinski N; Seipp HM; Kückelhaus M; Harati KK; Kolbenschlag JJ; Daigeler A; Jacobsen F; Lehnhardt M; Hirsch T
J Wound Care; 2017 Apr; 26(4):184-187. PubMed ID: 28379100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bacterial growth kinetics under a novel flexible methacrylate dressing serving as a drug delivery vehicle for antiseptics.
Forstner C; Leitgeb J; Schuster R; Dosch V; Kramer A; Cutting KF; Leaper DJ; Assadian O
Int J Mol Sci; 2013 May; 14(5):10582-90. PubMed ID: 23698780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Proposed phase 2/ step 2 in-vitro test on basis of EN 14561 for standardised testing of the wound antiseptics PVP-iodine, chlorhexidine digluconate, polihexanide and octenidine dihydrochloride.
Schedler K; Assadian O; Brautferger U; Müller G; Koburger T; Classen S; Kramer A
BMC Infect Dis; 2017 Feb; 17(1):143. PubMed ID: 28193164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of human acute wound fluid on the antibacterial efficacy of different antiseptic polyurethane foam dressings: An in vitro analysis.
Rembe JD; Fromm-Dornieden C; Böhm J; Stuermer EK
Wound Repair Regen; 2018 Jan; 26(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 29363857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A multimodel regime for evaluating effectiveness of antimicrobial wound care products in microbial biofilms.
Stoffel JJ; Kohler Riedi PL; Hadj Romdhane B
Wound Repair Regen; 2020 Jul; 28(4):438-447. PubMed ID: 32175636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Antimicrobial properties of antiseptic-impregnated biological dressings.
Kearney JN; Arain T; Holland KT
J Hosp Infect; 1988 Jan; 11(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 2895140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of selected wound antiseptics on adult articular cartilage (bovine sesamoid bone) in the presence of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus.
Müller G; Kramer A
J Orthop Res; 2005 Jan; 23(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 15607884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. New in vitro model evaluating antiseptics' efficacy in biofilm-associated Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic vascular graft infection.
Staneviciute E; Na'amnih W; Kavaliauskas P; Prakapaite R; Ridziauskas M; Kevlicius L; Kirkliauskiene A; Zabulis V; Urboniene J; Triponis V
J Med Microbiol; 2019 Mar; 68(3):432-439. PubMed ID: 30735113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. pH influence on antibacterial efficacy of common antiseptic substances.
Wiegand C; Abel M; Ruth P; Elsner P; Hipler UC
Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2015; 28(3):147-58. PubMed ID: 25614073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro action of combinations of selected antimicrobial agents and adult bovine articular cartilage (sesamoid bone).
Müller G; Kramer A
Chem Biol Interact; 2003 Jun; 145(3):331-6. PubMed ID: 12732459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of negative pressure wound therapy with antibacterial dressings or antiseptics on an in vitro wound model.
Matiasek J; Domig KJ; Djedovic G; Babeluk R; Assadian O
J Wound Care; 2017 May; 26(5):236-242. PubMed ID: 28475440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [A comparative in vitro study of cell toxicity of clinically used antiseptics].
Hirsch T; Jacobsen F; Rittig A; Goertz O; Niederbichler A; Steinau HU; Seipp HM; Steinstraesser L
Hautarzt; 2009 Dec; 60(12):984-91. PubMed ID: 19812986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Antimicrobial efficacy of 3 oral antiseptics containing octenidine, polyhexamethylene biguanide, or Citroxx: can chlorhexidine be replaced?
Rohrer N; Widmer AF; Waltimo T; Kulik EM; Weiger R; Filipuzzi-Jenny E; Walter C
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2010 Jul; 31(7):733-9. PubMed ID: 20518635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Uptake of PHMB in a bacterial nanocellulose-based wound dressing: A feasible clinical procedure.
de Mattos IB; Holzer JCJ; Tuca AC; Groeber-Becker F; Funk M; Popp D; Mautner S; Birngruber T; Kamolz LP
Burns; 2019 Jun; 45(4):898-904. PubMed ID: 30509765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In Vitro Efficacy of Bacterial Cellulose Dressings Chemisorbed with Antiseptics against Biofilm Formed by Pathogens Isolated from Chronic Wounds.
Dydak K; Junka A; Dydak A; Brożyna M; Paleczny J; Fijalkowski K; Kubielas G; Aniołek O; Bartoszewicz M
Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Apr; 22(8):. PubMed ID: 33924416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of antiseptics containing povidone-iodine, octenidine dihydrochloride and ethacridine lactate against biofilm formed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus measured with the novel biofilm-oriented antiseptics test.
Junka A; Bartoszewicz M; Smutnicka D; Secewicz A; Szymczyk P
Int Wound J; 2014 Dec; 11(6):730-4. PubMed ID: 23445335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Active wound dressings based on bacterial nanocellulose as drug delivery system for octenidine.
Moritz S; Wiegand C; Wesarg F; Hessler N; Müller FA; Kralisch D; Hipler UC; Fischer D
Int J Pharm; 2014 Aug; 471(1-2):45-55. PubMed ID: 24792978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An in vitro model of chronic wound biofilms to test wound dressings and assess antimicrobial susceptibilities.
Hill KE; Malic S; McKee R; Rennison T; Harding KG; Williams DW; Thomas DW
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2010 Jun; 65(6):1195-206. PubMed ID: 20378671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
