These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21188364)

  • 1. Multistage audiovisual integration of speech: dissociating identification and detection.
    Eskelund K; Tuomainen J; Andersen TS
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Feb; 208(3):447-57. PubMed ID: 21188364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech-specific audiovisual integration modulates induced theta-band oscillations.
    Lindborg A; Baart M; Stekelenburg JJ; Vroomen J; Andersen TS
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219744. PubMed ID: 31310616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural Mechanisms Underlying Cross-Modal Phonetic Encoding.
    Shahin AJ; Backer KC; Rosenblum LD; Kerlin JR
    J Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 38(7):1835-1849. PubMed ID: 29263241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual uncertainty explains activation differences between audiovisual congruent speech and McGurk stimuli.
    Dong C; Noppeney U; Wang S
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2024 Mar; 45(4):e26653. PubMed ID: 38488460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Timing in audiovisual speech perception: A mini review and new psychophysical data.
    Venezia JH; Thurman SM; Matchin W; George SE; Hickok G
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Feb; 78(2):583-601. PubMed ID: 26669309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrophysiological evidence for speech-specific audiovisual integration.
    Baart M; Stekelenburg JJ; Vroomen J
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jan; 53():115-21. PubMed ID: 24291340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Early and late beta-band power reflect audiovisual perception in the McGurk illusion.
    Roa Romero Y; Senkowski D; Keil J
    J Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr; 113(7):2342-50. PubMed ID: 25568160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of age and left hemisphere lesions on audiovisual integration of speech.
    Michaelis K; Erickson LC; Fama ME; Skipper-Kallal LM; Xing S; Lacey EH; Anbari Z; Norato G; Rauschecker JP; Turkeltaub PE
    Brain Lang; 2020 Jul; 206():104812. PubMed ID: 32447050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Causal Inference Model Explains Perception of the McGurk Effect and Other Incongruent Audiovisual Speech.
    Magnotti JF; Beauchamp MS
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Feb; 13(2):e1005229. PubMed ID: 28207734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Primary and multisensory cortical activity is correlated with audiovisual percepts.
    Benoit MM; Raij T; Lin FH; Jääskeläinen IP; Stufflebeam S
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2010 Apr; 31(4):526-38. PubMed ID: 19780040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. "Paying" attention to audiovisual speech: Do incongruent stimuli incur greater costs?
    Brown VA; Strand JF
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Aug; 81(6):1743-1756. PubMed ID: 31197661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural correlates of interindividual differences in children's audiovisual speech perception.
    Nath AR; Fava EE; Beauchamp MS
    J Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 31(39):13963-71. PubMed ID: 21957257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Audiovisual integration of speech falters under high attention demands.
    Alsius A; Navarra J; Campbell R; Soto-Faraco S
    Curr Biol; 2005 May; 15(9):839-43. PubMed ID: 15886102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children.
    Huyse A; Berthommier F; Leybaert J
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Processing of audiovisually congruent and incongruent speech in school-age children with a history of specific language impairment: a behavioral and event-related potentials study.
    Kaganovich N; Schumaker J; Macias D; Gustafson D
    Dev Sci; 2015 Sep; 18(5):751-70. PubMed ID: 25440407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech and non-speech measures of audiovisual integration are not correlated.
    Wilbiks JMP; Brown VA; Strand JF
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Aug; 84(6):1809-1819. PubMed ID: 35610409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neurophysiological Indices of Audiovisual Speech Processing Reveal a Hierarchy of Multisensory Integration Effects.
    O'Sullivan AE; Crosse MJ; Liberto GMD; de Cheveigné A; Lalor EC
    J Neurosci; 2021 Jun; 41(23):4991-5003. PubMed ID: 33824190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What you see isn't always what you get: Auditory word signals trump consciously perceived words in lexical access.
    Ostrand R; Blumstein SE; Ferreira VS; Morgan JL
    Cognition; 2016 Jun; 151():96-107. PubMed ID: 27011021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Audiovisual sentence recognition not predicted by susceptibility to the McGurk effect.
    Van Engen KJ; Xie Z; Chandrasekaran B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):396-403. PubMed ID: 27921268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physical and perceptual factors shape the neural mechanisms that integrate audiovisual signals in speech comprehension.
    Lee H; Noppeney U
    J Neurosci; 2011 Aug; 31(31):11338-50. PubMed ID: 21813693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.