These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21188832)

  • 1. Discriminating cancer from noncancer tissue in the prostate by 3-dimensional proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging: a prospective multicenter validation study.
    Scheenen TW; Fütterer J; Weiland E; van Hecke P; Lemort M; Zechmann C; Schlemmer HP; Broome D; Villeirs G; Lu J; Barentsz J; Roell S; Heerschap A
    Invest Radiol; 2011 Jan; 46(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 21188832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopy of human prostate at 3 T without endorectal coil: feasibility.
    Scheenen TW; Heijmink SW; Roell SA; Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA; Knipscheer BC; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO; Heerschap A
    Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):507-16. PubMed ID: 17848681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peripheral zone prostate cancer localization by multiparametric magnetic resonance at 3 T: unbiased cancer identification by matching to histopathology.
    Selnæs KM; Heerschap A; Jensen LR; Tessem MB; Schweder GJ; Goa PE; Viset T; Angelsen A; Gribbestad IS
    Invest Radiol; 2012 Nov; 47(11):624-33. PubMed ID: 23011187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reproducibility of 3D 1H MR spectroscopic imaging of the prostate at 1.5T.
    Lagemaat MW; Zechmann CM; Fütterer JJ; Weiland E; Lu J; Villeirs GM; Holshouser BA; van Hecke P; Lemort M; Schlemmer HP; Barentsz JO; Roell SO; Heerschap A; Scheenen TW
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Jan; 35(1):166-73. PubMed ID: 21960013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Initial results of 3-dimensional 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging in the localization of prostate cancer at 3 Tesla: should we use an endorectal coil?
    Yakar D; Heijmink SW; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Huisman H; Barentsz JO; Fütterer JJ; Scheenen TW
    Invest Radiol; 2011 May; 46(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 21217527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combined morphological, [1H]-MR spectroscopic and contrast-enhanced imaging of human prostate cancer with a 3-Tesla scanner: preliminary experience.
    Carlani M; Mancino S; Bonanno E; Finazzi Agrò E; Simonetti G
    Radiol Med; 2008 Aug; 113(5):670-88. PubMed ID: 18493829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High-Quality 3-Dimensional 1H Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Imaging of the Prostate Without Endorectal Receive Coil Using A Semi-LASER Sequence.
    Tayari N; Steinseifer IK; Selnæs KM; Bathen TF; Maas MC; Heerschap A
    Invest Radiol; 2017 Oct; 52(10):640-646. PubMed ID: 28632688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Single-Arm, Multicenter Validation Study of Prostate Cancer Localization and Aggressiveness With a Quantitative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Approach.
    Maas MC; Litjens GJS; Wright AJ; Attenberger UI; Haider MA; Helbich TH; Kiefer B; Macura KJ; Margolis DJA; Padhani AR; Selnæs KM; Villeirs GM; Fütterer JJ; Scheenen TWJ
    Invest Radiol; 2019 Jul; 54(7):437-447. PubMed ID: 30946180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prostate depiction at endorectal MR spectroscopic imaging: investigation of a standardized evaluation system.
    Jung JA; Coakley FV; Vigneron DB; Swanson MG; Qayyum A; Weinberg V; Jones KD; Carroll PR; Kurhanewicz J
    Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):701-8. PubMed ID: 15564406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging at 7 T in patients with prostate cancer.
    Lagemaat MW; Vos EK; Maas MC; Bitz AK; Orzada S; van Uden MJ; Kobus T; Heerschap A; Scheenen TW
    Invest Radiol; 2014 May; 49(5):363-72. PubMed ID: 24335715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of prostate cancer with MR spectroscopic imaging: an expanded paradigm incorporating polyamines.
    Shukla-Dave A; Hricak H; Moskowitz C; Ishill N; Akin O; Kuroiwa K; Spector J; Kumar M; Reuter VE; Koutcher JA; Zakian KL
    Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):499-506. PubMed ID: 17890357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prostate cancer: metabolic response to cryosurgery as detected with 3D H-1 MR spectroscopic imaging.
    Kurhanewicz J; Vigneron DB; Hricak H; Parivar F; Nelson SJ; Shinohara K; Carroll PR
    Radiology; 1996 Aug; 200(2):489-96. PubMed ID: 8685346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vivo assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness using magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging at 3 T with an endorectal coil.
    Kobus T; Hambrock T; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Wright AJ; Barentsz JO; Heerschap A; Scheenen TW
    Eur Urol; 2011 Nov; 60(5):1074-80. PubMed ID: 21419565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Standardized threshold approach using three-dimensional proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging in prostate cancer localization of the entire prostate.
    Fütterer JJ; Scheenen TW; Heijmink SW; Huisman HJ; Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA; Witjes JA; Heerschap A; Barentsz JO
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Feb; 42(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 17220729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peripheral zone prostate cancer: accuracy of different interpretative approaches with MR and MR spectroscopic imaging.
    Westphalen AC; Coakley FV; Qayyum A; Swanson M; Simko JP; Lu Y; Zhao S; Carroll PR; Yeh BM; Kurhanewicz J
    Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):177-84. PubMed ID: 18024434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of prostate voxels identified as suspicious of malignancy on three-dimensional (1)H MR spectroscopic imaging in patients with abnormal digital rectal examination or raised prostate specific antigen level of 4-10 ng/ml.
    Kumar V; Jagannathan NR; Kumar R; Thulkar S; Gupta SD; Hemal AK; Gupta NP
    NMR Biomed; 2007 Feb; 20(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 16894640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of an endorectal coil for 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the prostate at 3.0T in comparison to 1.5T: Do we need an endorectal coil?
    Hoffner MK; Huebner F; Scholtz JE; Zangos S; Schulz B; Luboldt W; Vogl TJ; Bodelle B
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Aug; 85(8):1432-8. PubMed ID: 27423684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-dimensional proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging with and without an endorectal coil: a prostate phantom study.
    Ma C; Chen L; Scheenen TW; Lu J; Wang J
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Nov; 56(11):1342-9. PubMed ID: 25348479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MR spectroscopy of the human prostate using surface coil at 3 T: metabolite ratios, age-dependent effects, and diagnostic possibilities.
    Weis J; Jorulf H; Bergman A; Ortiz-Nieto F; Häggman M; Ahlström H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Dec; 34(6):1277-84. PubMed ID: 21954046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discrimination of prostate cancer from normal peripheral zone and central gland tissue by using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
    Engelbrecht MR; Huisman HJ; Laheij RJ; Jager GJ; van Leenders GJ; Hulsbergen-Van De Kaa CA; de la Rosette JJ; Blickman JG; Barentsz JO
    Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):248-54. PubMed ID: 12944607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.