These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21189113)

  • 1. Would loss to follow-up bias the outcome evaluation of patients operated for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine?
    Solberg TK; Sørlie A; Sjaavik K; Nygaard ØP; Ingebrigtsen T
    Acta Orthop; 2011 Feb; 82(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 21189113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Swespine: the Swedish spine register : the 2012 report.
    Strömqvist B; Fritzell P; Hägg O; Jönsson B; Sandén B;
    Eur Spine J; 2013 Apr; 22(4):953-74. PubMed ID: 23575657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What level of pain are patients happy to live with after surgery for lumbar degenerative disorders?
    Fekete TF; Haschtmann D; Kleinstück FS; Porchet F; Jeszenszky D; Mannion AF
    Spine J; 2016 Apr; 16(4 Suppl):S12-8. PubMed ID: 26850172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Criteria for failure and worsening after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a multicenter observational study based on data from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.
    Werner DAT; Grotle M; Gulati S; Austevoll IM; Lønne G; Nygaard ØP; Solberg TK
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Oct; 26(10):2650-2659. PubMed ID: 28616747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The value of patient global assessment in lumbar spine surgery: an evaluation based on more than 90,000 patients.
    Parai C; Hägg O; Lind B; Brisby H
    Eur Spine J; 2018 Mar; 27(3):554-563. PubMed ID: 29058135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Follow-up score, change score or percentage change score for determining clinical important outcome following surgery? An observational study from the Norwegian registry for Spine surgery evaluating patient reported outcome measures in lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Austevoll IM; Gjestad R; Grotle M; Solberg T; Brox JI; Hermansen E; Rekeland F; Indrekvam K; Storheim K; Hellum C
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Jan; 20(1):31. PubMed ID: 30658613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characteristics and predicted outcome of patients lost to follow-up after degenerative lumbar spine surgery.
    Parai C; Hägg O; Willers C; Lind B; Brisby H
    Eur Spine J; 2020 Dec; 29(12):3063-3073. PubMed ID: 32666273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Short- and Long-Term Outcome of Microscopic Lumbar Spine Surgery in Patients with Predominant Back or Predominant Leg Pain.
    Stienen MN; Joswig H; Smoll NR; Corniola MV; Schaller K; Hildebrandt G; Gautschi OP
    World Neurosurg; 2016 Sep; 93():458-465.e1. PubMed ID: 27389938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term follow-up review of patients who underwent laminectomy for lumbar stenosis: a prospective study.
    Javid MJ; Hadar EJ
    J Neurosurg; 1998 Jul; 89(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 9647165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two-year comprehensive medical management of degenerative lumbar spine disease (lumbar spondylolisthesis, stenosis, or disc herniation): a value analysis of cost, pain, disability, and quality of life: clinical article.
    Parker SL; Godil SS; Mendenhall SK; Zuckerman SL; Shau DN; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 24785973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Follow-up of degenerative lumbar spine surgery-PROMs stabilize after 1 year: an equivalence study based on Swespine data.
    Parai C; Hägg O; Lind B; Brisby H
    Eur Spine J; 2019 Sep; 28(9):2187-2197. PubMed ID: 31041598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Non-respondents do not bias outcome assessment after cervical spine surgery: a multicenter observational study from the Norwegian registry for spine surgery (NORspine).
    Ingebrigtsen T; Aune G; Karlsen ME; Gulati S; Kolstad F; Nygaard ØP; Thyrhaug AM; Solberg TK
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2023 Jan; 165(1):125-133. PubMed ID: 36539647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inadequacy of 3-month Oswestry Disability Index outcome for assessing individual longer-term patient experience after lumbar spine surgery.
    Asher AL; Chotai S; Devin CJ; Speroff T; Harrell FE; Nian H; Dittus RS; Mummaneni PV; Knightly JJ; Glassman SD; Bydon M; Archer KR; Foley KT; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Aug; 25(2):170-80. PubMed ID: 26989974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incidental durotomy in degenerative lumbar spine surgery - a register study of 64,431 operations.
    Strömqvist F; Sigmundsson FG; Strömqvist B; Jönsson B; Karlsson MK
    Spine J; 2019 Apr; 19(4):624-630. PubMed ID: 30172899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
    Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The DIAM spinal stabilisation system to treat degenerative disease of the lumbosacral spine].
    Hrabálek L; Machác J; Vaverka M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Oct; 76(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 19912707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lumbar disc herniation surgery in adolescents and young adults: a long-term outcome comparison.
    Lagerbäck T; Möller H; Gerdhem P
    Bone Joint J; 2019 Dec; 101-B(12):1534-1541. PubMed ID: 31786988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictive outcome factors in the young patient treated with lumbar disc herniation surgery.
    Strömqvist F; Strömqvist B; Jönsson B; Gerdhem P; Karlsson MK
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Oct; 25(4):448-455. PubMed ID: 27203813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 1. Disability, quality of life, and pain outcomes following lumbar spine surgery: predicting likely individual patient outcomes for shared decision-making.
    McGirt MJ; Bydon M; Archer KR; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Parker SL; Nian H; Harrell FE; Speroff T; Dittus RS; Philips SE; Shaffrey CI; Foley KT; Asher AL
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):357-369. PubMed ID: 28498074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison of surgical practice variation and clinical outcome in three national spine registries.
    Lønne G; Fritzell P; Hägg O; Nordvall D; Gerdhem P; Lagerbäck T; Andersen M; Eiskjaer S; Gehrchen M; Jacobs W; van Hooff ML; Solberg TK
    Spine J; 2019 Jan; 19(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 29792994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.