These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21190477)

  • 1. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for the management of failed Angelchik prosthesis.
    Jalil O; Zia MK; Hassn A; Morcous P
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2011; 21(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 21190477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Complications of the Angelchik prosthesis in the management of gastroesophageal reflux.
    Kauten JR; Mansour KA
    Am Surg; 1986 Apr; 52(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 3954273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surgery for gastro-oesophageal reflux: the Angelchik prosthesis compared to the floppy Nissen fundoplication. Two-year follow-up study and a five-year evaluation of the Angelchik prosthesis.
    Deakin M; Mayer D; Temple JG
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1989 Jul; 71(4):249-52. PubMed ID: 2774454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Successful laparoscopic removal of a migrated Angelchik prosthesis.
    Plaisier PW; Lange JF
    Surg Endosc; 2000 Jun; 14(6):592. PubMed ID: 11287994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laparoscopic transgastric removal of an eroded Angelchik prosthesis.
    Carbonell AM; Maher JW
    Am Surg; 2006 Aug; 72(8):724-6; discussion 727. PubMed ID: 16913317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective randomized trial of Nissen fundoplication and Angelchik prosthesis in the surgical treatment of medically refractory gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.
    Kmiot WA; Kirby RM; Akinola D; Temple JG
    Br J Surg; 1991 Oct; 78(10):1181-4. PubMed ID: 1958979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laparoscopic removal of an Angelchik prosthesis.
    Underwood RA; Weinstock LB; Soper NJ; Quasebarth MA; Brunt LM
    Surg Endosc; 1999 Jun; 13(6):615-7. PubMed ID: 10347303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair in patients with poor esophageal motility or paraesophageal herniation.
    Livingston CD; Jones HL; Askew RE; Victor BE; Askew RE
    Am Surg; 2001 Oct; 67(10):987-91. PubMed ID: 11603559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ten-year follow up after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease.
    Cowgill SM; Gillman R; Kraemer E; Al-Saadi S; Villadolid D; Rosemurgy A
    Am Surg; 2007 Aug; 73(8):748-52; discussion 752-3. PubMed ID: 17879678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis and postoperative dysphagia.
    Leguit P; Hagen WB; Laarman J
    Neth J Surg; 1987 Jun; 39(3):86-9. PubMed ID: 3614751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of laparoscopic management of recurrent gastroesophageal reflux disease and hiatal hernia: long term results and evaluation of changing trends.
    Bansal S; Rothenberg SS
    J Pediatr Surg; 2014 Jan; 49(1):72-5; discussion 75-6. PubMed ID: 24439584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis using a model for esophageal reflux in rhesus monkeys.
    Cohen DJ; Benjamin SB; Graeber GM; Castell DO; Patrick DH; Cordova C; Dachman A; Friedman A
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1986 Feb; 41(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 3947163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective randomized trial of angelchik prosthesis versus Nissen fundoplication.
    Stuart RC; Dawson K; Keeling P; Byrne PJ; Hennessy TP
    Br J Surg; 1989 Jan; 76(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 2645016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Angelchik prosthesis revisited.
    Varshney S; Kelly JJ; Branagan G; Somers SS; Kelly JM
    World J Surg; 2002 Jan; 26(1):129-33. PubMed ID: 11898046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transoral incisionless fundoplication does not significantly increase morbidity of subsequent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.
    Perry KA; Linn JG; Eakin JL; Onders RP; Velanovich V; Melvin WS
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2013 May; 23(5):456-8. PubMed ID: 23578416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic refundoplication with prosthetic hiatal closure for recurrent hiatal hernia after primary failed antireflux surgery.
    Granderath FA; Kamolz T; Schweiger UM; Pointner R
    Arch Surg; 2003 Aug; 138(8):902-7. PubMed ID: 12912751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surgery for gastro-oesophageal reflux: the Angelchik prosthesis compared to the floppy Nissen fundoplication. Two-year follow-up study and a five-year evaluation of the Angelchik prosthesis.
    Dehn TC
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1990 Jan; 72(1):69. PubMed ID: 2301909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized double-blind trial of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication versus anterior partial fundoplication.
    Baigrie RJ; Cullis SN; Ndhluni AJ; Cariem A
    Br J Surg; 2005 Jul; 92(7):819-23. PubMed ID: 15898129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laparoscopic antireflux surgery: five-year results and beyond in 1340 patients.
    Pessaux P; Arnaud JP; Delattre JF; Meyer C; Baulieux J; Mosnier H
    Arch Surg; 2005 Oct; 140(10):946-51. PubMed ID: 16230543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multicenter, prospective, double-blind, randomized trial of laparoscopic nissen vs anterior 90 degrees partial fundoplication.
    Watson DI; Jamieson GG; Lally C; Archer S; Bessell JR; Booth M; Cade R; Cullingford G; Devitt PG; Fletcher DR; Hurley J; Kiroff G; Martin CJ; Martin IJ; Nathanson LK; Windsor JA;
    Arch Surg; 2004 Nov; 139(11):1160-7. PubMed ID: 15545560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.