These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21190477)
1. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for the management of failed Angelchik prosthesis. Jalil O; Zia MK; Hassn A; Morcous P J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2011; 21(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 21190477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Complications of the Angelchik prosthesis in the management of gastroesophageal reflux. Kauten JR; Mansour KA Am Surg; 1986 Apr; 52(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 3954273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgery for gastro-oesophageal reflux: the Angelchik prosthesis compared to the floppy Nissen fundoplication. Two-year follow-up study and a five-year evaluation of the Angelchik prosthesis. Deakin M; Mayer D; Temple JG Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1989 Jul; 71(4):249-52. PubMed ID: 2774454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Successful laparoscopic removal of a migrated Angelchik prosthesis. Plaisier PW; Lange JF Surg Endosc; 2000 Jun; 14(6):592. PubMed ID: 11287994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic transgastric removal of an eroded Angelchik prosthesis. Carbonell AM; Maher JW Am Surg; 2006 Aug; 72(8):724-6; discussion 727. PubMed ID: 16913317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective randomized trial of Nissen fundoplication and Angelchik prosthesis in the surgical treatment of medically refractory gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Kmiot WA; Kirby RM; Akinola D; Temple JG Br J Surg; 1991 Oct; 78(10):1181-4. PubMed ID: 1958979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of laparoscopic management of recurrent gastroesophageal reflux disease and hiatal hernia: long term results and evaluation of changing trends. Bansal S; Rothenberg SS J Pediatr Surg; 2014 Jan; 49(1):72-5; discussion 75-6. PubMed ID: 24439584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis using a model for esophageal reflux in rhesus monkeys. Cohen DJ; Benjamin SB; Graeber GM; Castell DO; Patrick DH; Cordova C; Dachman A; Friedman A Ann Thorac Surg; 1986 Feb; 41(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 3947163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective randomized trial of angelchik prosthesis versus Nissen fundoplication. Stuart RC; Dawson K; Keeling P; Byrne PJ; Hennessy TP Br J Surg; 1989 Jan; 76(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 2645016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Angelchik prosthesis revisited. Varshney S; Kelly JJ; Branagan G; Somers SS; Kelly JM World J Surg; 2002 Jan; 26(1):129-33. PubMed ID: 11898046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transoral incisionless fundoplication does not significantly increase morbidity of subsequent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Perry KA; Linn JG; Eakin JL; Onders RP; Velanovich V; Melvin WS J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2013 May; 23(5):456-8. PubMed ID: 23578416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic refundoplication with prosthetic hiatal closure for recurrent hiatal hernia after primary failed antireflux surgery. Granderath FA; Kamolz T; Schweiger UM; Pointner R Arch Surg; 2003 Aug; 138(8):902-7. PubMed ID: 12912751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surgery for gastro-oesophageal reflux: the Angelchik prosthesis compared to the floppy Nissen fundoplication. Two-year follow-up study and a five-year evaluation of the Angelchik prosthesis. Dehn TC Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1990 Jan; 72(1):69. PubMed ID: 2301909 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]