These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2119052)

  • 1. A 3-year evaluation of Gluma and Gluma/Scotchbond for restoration of cervical erosions.
    van Dijken JW
    Scand J Dent Res; 1990 Aug; 98(4):341-4. PubMed ID: 2119052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Five-year study of cervical erosions restored with resin and dentin-bonding agent.
    Hansen EK
    Scand J Dent Res; 1992 Aug; 100(4):244-7. PubMed ID: 1439532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 3-year clinical evaluation of modified Gluma adhesive systems in cervical abrasion/erosion lesions.
    Hörsted-Bindslev P; Knudsen J; Baelum V
    Am J Dent; 1996 Feb; 9(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 9002810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of GLUMA and GLUMA/Scotchbond on in vivo marginal adaptation of a composite resin to dentin.
    van Dijken JW; Horstedt P
    Dent Mater; 1989 May; 5(3):165-7. PubMed ID: 2517745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-year study of cervical erosions restored with resin and dentin-bonding agent.
    Hansen EK
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1989 Oct; 47(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 2531531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-year clinical performance of Clearfil SE and Clearfil S3 in restoration of unabraded non-carious class V lesions.
    Brackett MG; Dib A; Franco G; Estrada BE; Brackett WW
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 20533626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bonding of dentin adhesives in clinically-simulated occlusal resin composite restorations.
    Terkla LG; Mitchem JC; Mahler DB
    Am J Dent; 1991 Oct; 4(5):214-8. PubMed ID: 1810329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations.
    Powell LV; Johnson GH; Gordon GE
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8700767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of an all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions with different degrees of dentin sclerosis.
    Ritter AV; Heymann HO; Swift EJ; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(4):370-8. PubMed ID: 18666493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical performance of two dentine adhesives: 2-year results.
    Tyas MJ
    Aust Dent J; 1996 Oct; 41(5):324-7. PubMed ID: 8961606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microleakage of Gluma Bond, Scotchbond 2 and a glass ionomer/composite sandwich technique.
    Reeves GW; Fitchie JG; Scarbrough AR; Hembree JH
    Am J Dent; 1990 Oct; 3(5):195-8. PubMed ID: 2127533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Durability of three simplified adhesive systems in Class V non-carious cervical dentin lesions.
    van Dijken JW
    Am J Dent; 2004 Feb; 17(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 15241906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical comparison of Class V resin composite and glass ionomer restorations.
    Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH
    Am J Dent; 1992 Oct; 5(5):249-52. PubMed ID: 1299249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inhibition of bacterial growth under composite restorations following GLUMA pretreatment.
    Felton D; Bergenholtz G; Cox CF
    J Dent Res; 1989 Mar; 68(3):491-5. PubMed ID: 2493491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of four dentin bonding agents in Class V abrasion lesions: a four-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    Dent Mater; 1994 Sep; 10(5):319-24. PubMed ID: 7498593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative study: bond strength and microleakage with dentin bond systems.
    Tsai YH; Swartz ML; Phillips RW; Moore BK
    Oper Dent; 1990; 15(2):53-60. PubMed ID: 2115676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two-year clinical performance of Class V resin-modified glass-lonomer and resin composite restorations.
    Brackett WW; Dib A; Brackett MG; Reyes AA; Estrada BE
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):477-81. PubMed ID: 14531590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of direct esthetic restorations in cervical abrasion/erosion lesions: one-year results.
    Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Sep; 22(9):687-92. PubMed ID: 1835107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of cavity pretreatment procedures on dentin bonding: a four-year clinical evaluation.
    van Dijken JW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Aug; 64(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 2202813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of two dentin adhesives in cervical lesions.
    Van Meerbeek B; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Oct; 70(4):308-14. PubMed ID: 8229880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.