BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21191087)

  • 1. Determinants of synonymous and nonsynonymous variability in three species of Drosophila.
    Haddrill PR; Zeng K; Charlesworth B
    Mol Biol Evol; 2011 May; 28(5):1731-43. PubMed ID: 21191087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variation in synonymous codon use and DNA polymorphism within the Drosophila genome.
    Bierne N; Eyre-Walker A
    J Evol Biol; 2006 Jan; 19(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 16405571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of strong directional selection on weakly selected mutations at linked sites: implication for synonymous codon usage.
    Kim Y
    Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Feb; 21(2):286-94. PubMed ID: 14660698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selection intensity on preferred codons correlates with overall codon usage bias in Caenorhabditis remanei.
    Cutter AD; Charlesworth B
    Curr Biol; 2006 Oct; 16(20):2053-7. PubMed ID: 17055986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Single Nucleotide polymorphisms and their relationship to codon usage bias in the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas.
    Sauvage C; Bierne N; Lapègue S; Boudry P
    Gene; 2007 Dec; 406(1-2):13-22. PubMed ID: 17616269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Natural selection on synonymous and nonsynonymous mutations shapes patterns of polymorphism in Populus tremula.
    Ingvarsson PK
    Mol Biol Evol; 2010 Mar; 27(3):650-60. PubMed ID: 19837657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The molecular clock revisited: the rate of synonymous vs. replacement change in Drosophila.
    Zeng LW; Comeron JM; Chen B; Kreitman M
    Genetica; 1998; 102-103(1-6):369-82. PubMed ID: 9720289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nucleotide polymorphism in the RpII215 gene region of the insular species Drosophila guanche: reduced efficacy of weak selection on synonymous variation.
    Pérez JA; Munté A; Rozas J; Segarra C; Aguadé M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2003 Nov; 20(11):1867-75. PubMed ID: 12885962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mutation and selection at silent and replacement sites in the evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA.
    Rand DM; Kann LM
    Genetica; 1998; 102-103(1-6):393-407. PubMed ID: 9720291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intragenic Hill-Robertson interference influences selection intensity on synonymous mutations in Drosophila.
    Comeron JM; Guthrie TB
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Dec; 22(12):2519-30. PubMed ID: 16120803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patterns of selection on synonymous and nonsynonymous variants in Drosophila miranda.
    Bartolomé C; Maside X; Yi S; Grant AL; Charlesworth B
    Genetics; 2005 Mar; 169(3):1495-507. PubMed ID: 15545653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mutation-selection models of codon substitution and their use to estimate selective strengths on codon usage.
    Yang Z; Nielsen R
    Mol Biol Evol; 2008 Mar; 25(3):568-79. PubMed ID: 18178545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selection efficiency and effective population size in Drosophila species.
    Petit N; Barbadilla A
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Mar; 22(3):515-26. PubMed ID: 19170822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of demography and weak selection on the McDonald-Kreitman test: an empirical study in Drosophila.
    Parsch J; Zhang Z; Baines JF
    Mol Biol Evol; 2009 Mar; 26(3):691-8. PubMed ID: 19126864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evolution of amino-acid sequences and codon usage on the Drosophila miranda neo-sex chromosomes.
    Bartolomé C; Charlesworth B
    Genetics; 2006 Dec; 174(4):2033-44. PubMed ID: 17028318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The correlation between synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions in Drosophila: mutation, selection or relaxed constraints?
    Comeron JM; Kreitman M
    Genetics; 1998 Oct; 150(2):767-75. PubMed ID: 9755207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Molecular evolution of synonymous codon usage in Populus.
    Ingvarsson PK
    BMC Evol Biol; 2008 Nov; 8():307. PubMed ID: 18983655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating the parameters of selection on nonsynonymous mutations in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. miranda.
    Haddrill PR; Loewe L; Charlesworth B
    Genetics; 2010 Aug; 185(4):1381-96. PubMed ID: 20516497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Likelihood-based clustering (LiBaC) for codon models, a method for grouping sites according to similarities in the underlying process of evolution.
    Bao L; Gu H; Dunn KA; Bielawski JP
    Mol Biol Evol; 2008 Sep; 25(9):1995-2007. PubMed ID: 18586695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Why are translationally sub-optimal synonymous codons used in Escherichia coli?
    Smith NG; Eyre-Walker A
    J Mol Evol; 2001 Sep; 53(3):225-36. PubMed ID: 11523009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.