These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21191122)

  • 1. Informing patients: the influence of numeracy, framing, and format of side effect information on risk perceptions.
    Peters E; Hart PS; Fraenkel L
    Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 21191122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of risk communication formats on risk perception depending on numeracy.
    Keller C; Siegrist M
    Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(4):483-90. PubMed ID: 19525484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Presenting Numeric Information with Percentages and Descriptive Risk Labels: A Randomized Trial.
    Sinayev A; Peters E; Tusler M; Fraenkel L
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Nov; 35(8):937-47. PubMed ID: 25952743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving risk literacy in surgeons.
    Garcia-Retamero R; Cokely ET; Wicki B; Joeris A
    Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Jul; 99(7):1156-1161. PubMed ID: 26879804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Numbers matter to informed patient choices: a randomized design across age and numeracy levels.
    Peters E; Hart PS; Tusler M; Fraenkel L
    Med Decis Making; 2014 May; 34(4):430-42. PubMed ID: 24246563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Subjective Numeracy and the Influence of Order and Amount of Audible Information on Perceived Medication Value.
    Fraenkel L; Stolar M; Swift S; Street RL; Chowdhary H; Peters E
    Med Decis Making; 2017 Apr; 37(3):230-238. PubMed ID: 27216580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of numeracy on the comprehension of information about medicines in users of a patient information website.
    Gardner PH; McMillan B; Raynor DK; Woolf E; Knapp P
    Patient Educ Couns; 2011 Jun; 83(3):398-403. PubMed ID: 21621949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Numeracy and literacy independently predict patients' ability to identify out-of-range test results.
    Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Exe NL; Witteman HO
    J Med Internet Res; 2014 Aug; 16(8):e187. PubMed ID: 25135688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comprehension of Internet-based numeric cancer information by older adults.
    Donelle L; Hoffman-Goetz L; Gatobu S; Arocha JF
    Inform Health Soc Care; 2009 Dec; 34(4):209-24. PubMed ID: 19919298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Communicating Relative Risk Changes with Baseline Risk: Presentation Format and Numeracy Matter.
    Bodemer N; Meder B; Gigerenzer G
    Med Decis Making; 2014 Jul; 34(5):615-26. PubMed ID: 24803429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Presentation format affects comprehension and risk assessment: the case of prenatal screening.
    Miron-Shatz T; Hanoch Y; Graef D; Sagi M
    J Health Commun; 2009; 14(5):439-50. PubMed ID: 19657924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Communicating risk information: the influence of graphical display format on quantitative information perception-Accuracy, comprehension and preferences.
    Price M; Cameron R; Butow P
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Dec; 69(1-3):121-8. PubMed ID: 17905553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Health Professionals Prefer to Communicate Risk-Related Numerical Information Using "1-in-X" Ratios.
    Sirota M; Juanchich M; Petrova D; Garcia-Retamero R; Walasek L; Bhatia S
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Apr; 38(3):366-376. PubMed ID: 29068246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of home care nurses' numeracy and graph literacy on comprehension of visual display information: implications for dashboard design.
    Dowding D; Merrill JA; Onorato N; Barrón Y; Rosati RJ; Russell D
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2018 Feb; 25(2):175-182. PubMed ID: 28460091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Message Formats, Numeracy, Risk Perceptions of Alcohol-Attributable Cancer, and Intentions for Binge Drinking Among College Students.
    Chen Y; Yang ZJ
    J Drug Educ; 2015; 45(1):37-55. PubMed ID: 26376688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of risk ladder format on risk perception in high- and low-numerate individuals.
    Keller C; Siegrist M; Visschers V
    Risk Anal; 2009 Sep; 29(9):1255-64. PubMed ID: 19572963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Communicating global cardiovascular risk: are icon arrays better than numerical estimates in improving understanding, recall and perception of risk?
    Ruiz JG; Andrade AD; Garcia-Retamero R; Anam R; Rodriguez R; Sharit J
    Patient Educ Couns; 2013 Dec; 93(3):394-402. PubMed ID: 23916416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The art and science of teratogen risk communication.
    Conover EA; Polifka JE
    Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet; 2011 Aug; 157C(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 21766435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Alternate methods of framing information about medication side effects: incremental risk versus total risk of occurrence.
    Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Fagerlin A; Roberts TR; Derry HA; Ubel PA
    J Health Commun; 2008 Mar; 13(2):107-24. PubMed ID: 18300064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Communicating the risk of side effects to patients: an evaluation of UK regulatory recommendations.
    Knapp P; Raynor DK; Woolf E; Gardner PH; Carrigan N; McMillan B
    Drug Saf; 2009; 32(10):837-49. PubMed ID: 19722727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.