BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21191546)

  • 1. Spotlight on plagiarism.
    Mertens S
    Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2010 Dec; 107(49):863-5. PubMed ID: 21191546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?
    Steen RG
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Apr; 37(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 21186208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Iranian ministers in plagiarism row.
    Butler D
    Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7264):578-9. PubMed ID: 19794465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of retracted articles in the surgical literature.
    King EG; Oransky I; Sachs TE; Farber A; Flynn DB; Abritis A; Kalish JA; Siracuse JJ
    Am J Surg; 2018 Nov; 216(5):851-855. PubMed ID: 29229380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A case of plagiarism: lessons for editors, authors, reviewers, readers, and plagiarists.
    Alspach JG
    Crit Care Nurse; 2014 Oct; 34(5):12-6. PubMed ID: 25274760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Research: Uncovering misconduct.
    Gewin V
    Nature; 2012 May; 485(7396):137-9. PubMed ID: 22563582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scientific misconduct. Reviewer's déjà vu, French science sleuthing uncover plagiarized papers.
    Balter M
    Science; 2012 Mar; 335(6073):1157-8. PubMed ID: 22403360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Misconduct is the main cause of life-sciences retractions.
    Corbyn Z
    Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7418):21. PubMed ID: 23038445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Publication misconduct and plagiarism retractions: a Latin American perspective.
    Alfaro-Toloza P; Mayta-Tristan P; Rodriguez-Morales AJ
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2013 Feb; 29(2):99-100. PubMed ID: 23210610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Behind the scenes of scientific articles: defining categories of fraud and regulating cases].
    Pontille D; Torny D
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2012 Aug; 60(4):247-53. PubMed ID: 22819062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fake peer-review in research publication: revisiting research purpose and academic integrity.
    Hadi MA
    Int J Pharm Pract; 2016 Oct; 24(5):309-10. PubMed ID: 27623702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mistakes and misconduct in the research literature: retractions just the tip of the iceberg.
    Poulton A
    Med J Aust; 2007 Mar; 186(6):323-4. PubMed ID: 17371220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Integrity and misconduct in biomedical research].
    Schonhaut B L
    Rev Chil Pediatr; 2019 Apr; 90(2):217-221. PubMed ID: 31095239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retractions in the research literature: misconduct or mistakes?
    Nath SB; Marcus SC; Druss BG
    Med J Aust; 2006 Aug; 185(3):152-4. PubMed ID: 16893357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Publication misconduct and plagiarism retractions: a systematic, retrospective study.
    Stretton S; Bramich NJ; Keys JR; Monk JA; Ely JA; Haley C; Woolley MJ; Woolley KL
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2012 Oct; 28(10):1575-83. PubMed ID: 22978774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retraction of Neurosurgical Publications: A Systematic Review.
    Wang J; Ku JC; Alotaibi NM; Rutka JT
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Jul; 103():809-814.e1. PubMed ID: 28412480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Researchers have finally created a tool to spot duplicated images across thousands of papers.
    Butler D
    Nature; 2018 Mar; 555(7694):18. PubMed ID: 29493609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry publication standards of ethical conduct.
    Lefebvre CA; Lang BR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):311-4. PubMed ID: 15798678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Current trends in retraction of plastic surgery and reconstruction research.
    Punreddy A; Guirguis PG; Youssef M; Botros M
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2024 Jun; 93():136-139. PubMed ID: 38691949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Plagiarism and data falsification are the most common reasons for retracted publications in obstetrics and gynaecology.
    Chambers LM; Michener CM; Falcone T
    BJOG; 2019 Aug; 126(9):1134-1140. PubMed ID: 30903641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.