156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21191546)
21. Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications.
Fang FC; Steen RG; Casadevall A
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Oct; 109(42):17028-33. PubMed ID: 23027971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Retractions due to errors and frauds].
Decullier E; Samson G; Huot L
Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):847-52. PubMed ID: 22841376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Fraud in medicine. Coping with fraud.
Farthing MJ
Lancet; 1998 Dec 19-26; 352 Suppl 4():SIV11. PubMed ID: 9872158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Misconduct as the main cause for retraction. A descriptive study of retracted publications and their authors.
Campos-Varela I; Ruano-Raviña A
Gac Sanit; 2019; 33(4):356-360. PubMed ID: 29776690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Cost of Scientific Misconduct.
Tarazi C
Pediatr Res; 2015 Nov; 78(5):482. PubMed ID: 26263444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. A painful remedy.
Nature; 2010 Nov; 468(7320):6. PubMed ID: 21048718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. A rhetorical analysis of apologies for scientific misconduct: do they really mean it?
Souder L
Sci Eng Ethics; 2010 Mar; 16(1):175-84. PubMed ID: 19597968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Self-plagiarism case prompts calls for agencies to tighten rules.
Reich ES
Nature; 2010 Dec; 468(7325):745. PubMed ID: 21150967
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Reasons for and time to retraction of genetics articles published between 1970 and 2018.
Dal-Ré R; Ayuso C
J Med Genet; 2019 Nov; 56(11):734-740. PubMed ID: 31300549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Falsification, fabrication, and plagiarism: the unholy trinity of scientific writing.
Zietman AL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Oct; 87(2):225-7. PubMed ID: 23958142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. A tale of two citations.
Errami M; Garner H
Nature; 2008 Jan; 451(7177):397-9. PubMed ID: 18216832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Retracted publications in the drug literature.
Samp JC; Schumock GT; Pickard AS
Pharmacotherapy; 2012 Jul; 32(7):586-95. PubMed ID: 22581659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Research culture reduces scientific misconduct.
Shamsi A
Gac Sanit; 2020; 34(2):211. PubMed ID: 31924387
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Scientific conduct... and misconduct.
Genter MB; Brock WJ; Mattes WB
Toxicol Sci; 2015 Mar; 144(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 25901331
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Fraud, not error, is why two thirds of biomedical papers are withdrawn.
Roehr B
BMJ; 2012 Oct; 345():e6658. PubMed ID: 23033379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Plagiarism and other scientific misconducts.
Höffken K; Gabbert H
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2009 Mar; 135(3):327-8. PubMed ID: 19125293
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Ethics in publication.
Wallace MB; Siersema PD
Endoscopy; 2015 Jul; 47(7):575-8. PubMed ID: 26099116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Scientific misconduct encountered by APAME journals: an online survey.
Looi LM; Wong LX; Koh CC
Malays J Pathol; 2015 Dec; 37(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 26712665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Penalties plus high-quality review to fight plagiarism.
Wittmaack K
Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7047):24. PubMed ID: 16001039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Meet this super-spotter of duplicated images in science papers.
Shen H
Nature; 2020 May; 581(7807):132-136. PubMed ID: 32405024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
