These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21191597)

  • 1. Should we abstain from Gleason score 2-4 in the diagnosis of prostate cancer? Results of a German multicentre study.
    Brookman-May S; May M; Wieland WF; Lebentrau S; Gunia S; Koch S; Gilfrich C; Roigas J; Hoschke B; Burger M
    World J Urol; 2012 Feb; 30(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 21191597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Concordance of the Gleason score in prostate multibiopsy and definitive histology].
    May M; Brookman-May S; Lebentrau S; Gilfrich C; Loy V; Theissig F; Roigas J; Hoschke B; Burger M; Miller K
    Aktuelle Urol; 2010 May; 41(3):184-92. PubMed ID: 20309804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
    Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
    BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Revised Gleason grading system is a better predictor of indolent prostate cancer at the time of diagnosis: retrospective clinical-pathological study on matched biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Giunchi F; Brunocilla E; Borghesi M; Rizzi S; Ricci MS; Romagnoli D; Martorana G; Schiavina R; Fiorentino M
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2014 Oct; 12(5):325-9. PubMed ID: 24583160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Agreement of Gleason score on prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen: is there improvement with increased number of biopsy cylinders and the 2005 revised Gleason scoring?
    Van Praet C; Libbrecht L; D'Hondt F; Decaestecker K; Fonteyne V; Verschuere S; Rottey S; Praet M; De Visschere P; Lumen N;
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2014 Jun; 12(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 24361055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The modified International Society of Urological Pathology system improves concordance between biopsy and prostatectomy tumour grade.
    Hennes DMZB; Sewell J; Kerger M; Hovens CM; Peters JS; Costello AJ; Ryan A; Corcoran NM
    BJU Int; 2021 Dec; 128 Suppl 3():45-51. PubMed ID: 34310033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Upgrading and downgrading of prostate cancer from biopsy to radical prostatectomy: incidence and predictive factors using the modified Gleason grading system and factoring in tertiary grades.
    Epstein JI; Feng Z; Trock BJ; Pierorazio PM
    Eur Urol; 2012 May; 61(5):1019-24. PubMed ID: 22336380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical impact of prostate biopsy undergrading in an academic and community setting.
    Mortezavi A; Keller EX; Poyet C; Hermanns T; Saba K; Randazzo M; Fankhauser CD; Wild PJ; Moch H; Sulser T; Eberli D
    World J Urol; 2016 Oct; 34(10):1481-90. PubMed ID: 26931560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Utility of Gleason pattern 4 morphologies detected on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies for prediction of upgrading or upstaging in Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer.
    Flood TA; Schieda N; Keefe DT; Breau RH; Morash C; Hogan K; Belanger EC; Mai KT; Robertson SJ
    Virchows Arch; 2016 Sep; 469(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 27394432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. External beam radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer: therapeutic implications of stratification by pretreatment PSA levels and biopsy Gleason scores.
    Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Suh J; Macklis R; Klein E
    Cancer J Sci Am; 1997; 3(2):78-87. PubMed ID: 9099457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus guidelines on Gleason grading - a matched-pair analysis.
    Berg KD; Thomsen FB; Nerstrøm C; Røder MA; Iversen P; Toft BG; Vainer B; Brasso K
    BJU Int; 2016 Jun; 117(6):883-9. PubMed ID: 26823232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prostate cancer upgrading or downgrading of biopsy Gleason scores at radical prostatectomy: prediction of "regression to the mean" using routine clinical features with correlating biochemical relapse rates.
    Altok M; Troncoso P; Achim MF; Matin SF; Gonzalez GN; Davis JW
    Asian J Androl; 2019; 21(6):598-604. PubMed ID: 31115364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcomes of Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer with minimal amounts (<6%) vs ≥6% of Gleason pattern 4 tissue in needle biopsy specimens.
    Kır G; Seneldir H; Gumus E
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2016 Feb; 20():48-51. PubMed ID: 26750655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical and pathologic predictors of Gleason sum upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy: results from a single institution series.
    Tilki D; Schlenker B; John M; Buchner A; Stanislaus P; Gratzke C; Karl A; Tan GY; Ergün S; Tewari AK; Stief CG; Seitz M; Reich O
    Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(5):508-14. PubMed ID: 19837614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Clinically predictive factors of Gleason score upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy].
    Zuo Q; Zhang F; Huang Y; Ma LL; Lu M; Lu J
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Aug; 48(4):603-606. PubMed ID: 29263497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting the risk of harboring high-grade disease for patients diagnosed with prostate cancer scored as Gleason ≤ 6 on biopsy cores.
    Seisen T; Roudot-Thoraval F; Bosset PO; Beaugerie A; Allory Y; Vordos D; Abbou CC; De La Taille A; Salomon L
    World J Urol; 2015 Jun; 33(6):787-92. PubMed ID: 24985552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bioptic intraprostatic chronic inflammation predicts adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy in patients with low-grade prostate cancer.
    Sanguedolce F; Falagario UG; Castellan P; Di Nauta M; Silecchia G; Bruno SM; Russo D; Treacy PJ; Tewari AK; Montironi R; Carrieri G; Cormio L
    Urol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 38(10):793.e19-793.e25. PubMed ID: 32220548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Significance of Accurate Determination of Gleason Score for Therapeutic Options and Prognosis of Prostate Cancer.
    Helpap B; Ringli D; Tonhauser J; Poser I; Breul J; Gevensleben H; Seifert HH
    Pathol Oncol Res; 2016 Apr; 22(2):349-56. PubMed ID: 26563277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcome after radical prostatectomy with a pretreatment prostate biopsy Gleason score of >/=8.
    Manoharan M; Bird VG; Kim SS; Civantos F; Soloway MS
    BJU Int; 2003 Oct; 92(6):539-44. PubMed ID: 14511029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of prostate biopsies for predicting Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimens: nationwide trends 2000-2012.
    Danneman D; Drevin L; Delahunt B; Samaratunga H; Robinson D; Bratt O; Loeb S; Stattin P; Egevad L
    BJU Int; 2017 Jan; 119(1):50-56. PubMed ID: 26918298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.