These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21191861)

  • 1. A new outlier identification test for method comparison studies based on robust regression.
    Rauch G; Geistanger A; Timm J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jan; 21(1):151-69. PubMed ID: 21191861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new strategy of outlier detection for QSAR/QSPR.
    Cao DS; Liang YZ; Xu QS; Li HD; Chen X
    J Comput Chem; 2010 Feb; 31(3):592-602. PubMed ID: 19530115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimators and confidence intervals for the proportion using binary auxiliary information with applications to pharmaceutical studies.
    Rueda M; Muñoz JF; Arcos A; Álvarez E; Martínez S
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 May; 21(3):526-54. PubMed ID: 21442524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two confidence interval approaches on the dependability coefficient in a two-factor crossed design.
    Ting N; Cappelleri JC; Bushmakin AG
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Jul; 19(4):610-24. PubMed ID: 20183429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variance and confidence limits in validation studies based on comparison between three different types of measurements.
    Ferrari P; Kaaks R; Riboli E
    J Epidemiol Biostat; 2000; 5(5):303-13. PubMed ID: 11142606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Usefulness of residuals in clinical research].
    Cuevas-Urióstegui ML; Garduño-Espinosa J; Fajardo-Gutiérrez A; Hernández-Hernández DM; Martínez-García MC
    Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex; 1993 May; 50(5):359-66. PubMed ID: 8504006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Confidence intervals for the overall effect size in random-effects meta-analysis.
    Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Mar; 13(1):31-48. PubMed ID: 18331152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of clustered matched-pair data.
    Durkalski VL; Palesch YY; Lipsitz SR; Rust PF
    Stat Med; 2003 Aug; 22(15):2417-28. PubMed ID: 12872299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of methods to handle skew distributed cost variables in the analysis of the resource consumption in schizophrenia treatment.
    Kilian R; Matschinger H; Löeffler W; Roick C; Angermeyer MC
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2002 Mar; 5(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 12529567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Residuals and outliers in replicate design crossover studies.
    Schall R; Endrenyi L; Ring A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Jul; 20(4):835-49. PubMed ID: 20496209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A robust approach for analyzing unbalanced factorial designs with fixed levels.
    Vallejo G; Ato M; Fernández MP
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 May; 42(2):607-17. PubMed ID: 20479192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Testing for a single outlier from a general linear regression.
    Ellenberg JH
    Biometrics; 1976 Sep; 32(3):637-45. PubMed ID: 963176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials.
    Ukoumunne OC
    Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(24):3757-74. PubMed ID: 12483765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of recent methods for the analysis of small-sample cross-over studies.
    Chen X; Wei L
    Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(18):2821-33. PubMed ID: 12953282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of instrument error and method agreement.
    Chatburn RL
    AANA J; 1996 Jun; 64(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 9095698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?
    Huedo-Medina TB; Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F; Botella J
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Jun; 11(2):193-206. PubMed ID: 16784338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. F-type statistics and the analysis of binomial data with overdispersion.
    Mauromoustakos A; McNew RW
    J Biopharm Stat; 1994 Jul; 4(2):189-98. PubMed ID: 7951274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An adaptive test of significance for a subset of regression coefficients.
    O'Gorman TW
    Stat Med; 2002 Nov; 21(22):3527-42. PubMed ID: 12407688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimal sampling schedule of diet components: model robustness to departure from assumptions.
    St-Pierre NR; Cobanov B
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Dec; 90(12):5395-404. PubMed ID: 18024730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of robust procedures for estimation of breeding values in multiple-trait random regression test-day model.
    Jamrozik J; Fatehi J; Schaeffer LR
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Feb; 124(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 17302954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.