These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21192670)

  • 41. Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking.
    Wang R; Lu Y; Wang S
    J Med Chem; 2003 Jun; 46(12):2287-303. PubMed ID: 12773034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The use of protein-ligand interaction fingerprints in docking.
    Brewerton SC
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2008 May; 11(3):356-64. PubMed ID: 18428089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Improving the scoring of protein-ligand binding affinity by including the effects of structural water and electronic polarization.
    Liu J; He X; Zhang JZ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jun; 53(6):1306-14. PubMed ID: 23651068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. DSX: a knowledge-based scoring function for the assessment of protein-ligand complexes.
    Neudert G; Klebe G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Oct; 51(10):2731-45. PubMed ID: 21863864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Knowledge-based interaction fingerprint scoring: a simple method for improving the effectiveness of fast scoring functions.
    Mpamhanga CP; Chen B; McLay IM; Willett P
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):686-98. PubMed ID: 16562999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A comparative assessment of ranking accuracies of conventional and machine-learning-based scoring functions for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2012; 9(5):1301-13. PubMed ID: 22411892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A novel method for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction and the related descriptors exploration.
    Li S; Xi L; Wang C; Li J; Lei B; Liu H; Yao X
    J Comput Chem; 2009 Apr; 30(6):900-9. PubMed ID: 18785151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Scoring a diverse set of high-quality docked conformations: a metascore based on electrostatic and desolvation interactions.
    Camacho CJ; Ma H; Champ PC
    Proteins; 2006 Jun; 63(4):868-77. PubMed ID: 16506242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Prediction of binding modes for ligands in the cytochromes P450 and other heme-containing proteins.
    Kirton SB; Murray CW; Verdonk ML; Taylor RD
    Proteins; 2005 Mar; 58(4):836-44. PubMed ID: 15651036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions.
    Gohlke H; Hendlich M; Klebe G
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Jan; 295(2):337-56. PubMed ID: 10623530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Improving binding mode predictions by docking into protein-specifically adapted potential fields.
    Radestock S; Böhm M; Gohlke H
    J Med Chem; 2005 Aug; 48(17):5466-79. PubMed ID: 16107145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Structure-based virtual screening with supervised consensus scoring: evaluation of pose prediction and enrichment factors.
    Teramoto R; Fukunishi H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Apr; 48(4):747-54. PubMed ID: 18318474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Novel scoring functions comprising QXP, SASA, and protein side-chain entropy terms.
    Giordanetto F; Cotesta S; Catana C; Trosset JY; Vulpetti A; Stouten PF; Kroemer RT
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(3):882-93. PubMed ID: 15154753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Ranking poses in structure-based lead discovery and optimization: current trends in scoring function development.
    Rajamani R; Good AC
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2007 May; 10(3):308-15. PubMed ID: 17554857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Complex-type-dependent scoring functions in protein-protein docking.
    Li CH; Ma XH; Shen LZ; Chang S; Chen WZ; Wang CX
    Biophys Chem; 2007 Aug; 129(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 17540496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Empirical scoring functions for advanced protein-ligand docking with PLANTS.
    Korb O; Stützle T; Exner TE
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jan; 49(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 19125657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on an updated benchmark: 2. Evaluation methods and general results.
    Li Y; Han L; Liu Z; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jun; 54(6):1717-36. PubMed ID: 24708446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Protein-binding site prediction based on three-dimensional protein modeling.
    Oh M; Joo K; Lee J
    Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9():152-6. PubMed ID: 19768678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. M-score: a knowledge-based potential scoring function accounting for protein atom mobility.
    Yang CY; Wang R; Wang S
    J Med Chem; 2006 Oct; 49(20):5903-11. PubMed ID: 17004706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Binding affinity prediction for protein-ligand complexes based on β contacts and B factor.
    Liu Q; Kwoh CK; Li J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3076-85. PubMed ID: 24191692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.