These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21194553)

  • 1. The visual coding of grip aperture shows an early but not late adherence to Weber's law.
    Heath M; Mulla A; Holmes SA; Smuskowitz LR
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Mar; 490(3):200-4. PubMed ID: 21194553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visually and memory-guided grasping: aperture shaping exhibits a time-dependent scaling to Weber's law.
    Holmes SA; Mulla A; Binsted G; Heath M
    Vision Res; 2011 Sep; 51(17):1941-8. PubMed ID: 21777599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Goal-directed grasping: the dimensional properties of an object influence the nature of the visual information mediating aperture shaping.
    Holmes SA; Heath M
    Brain Cogn; 2013 Jun; 82(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 23501700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distinct visual cues mediate aperture shaping for grasping and pantomime-grasping tasks.
    Holmes SA; Lohmus J; McKinnon S; Mulla A; Heath M
    J Mot Behav; 2013; 45(5):431-9. PubMed ID: 23971991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical constraints do not influence pantomime-grasping adherence to Weber's law: A reply to Utz et al. (2015).
    Manzone J; Davarpanah Jazi S; Whitwell RL; Heath M
    Vision Res; 2017 Jan; 130():31-35. PubMed ID: 27876512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Grasping Weber's illusion: the effect of receptor density differences on grasping and matching.
    Anema HA; Wolswijk VW; Ruis C; Dijkerman HC
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008; 25(7-8):951-67. PubMed ID: 19378413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Weber's law in tactile grasping and manual estimation: feedback-dependent evidence for functionally distinct processing streams.
    Davarpanah Jazi S; Heath M
    Brain Cogn; 2014 Apr; 86():32-41. PubMed ID: 24556320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Grasping time does not influence the early adherence of aperture shaping to Weber's law.
    Heath M; Holmes SA; Mulla A; Binsted G
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2012; 6():332. PubMed ID: 23267323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Obeying the law: speed-precision tradeoffs and the adherence to Weber's law in 2D grasping.
    Ozana A; Ganel T
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Aug; 237(8):2011-2021. PubMed ID: 31161415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Both vision-for-perception and vision-for-action follow Weber's law at small object sizes, but violate it at larger sizes.
    Bruno N; Uccelli S; Viviani E; de'Sperati C
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Oct; 91():327-334. PubMed ID: 27553269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Action is immune to the effects of Weber's law throughout the entire grasping trajectory.
    Ganel T; Freud E; Meiran N
    J Vis; 2014 Jun; 14(7):. PubMed ID: 24961248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hand anthropometry and the limits of aperture separation determine the utility of Weber's law in grasping and manual estimation.
    Ayala N; Binsted G; Heath M
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Aug; 236(8):2439-2446. PubMed ID: 29923096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Grasping a 2D object: terminal haptic feedback supports an absolute visuo-haptic calibration.
    Hosang S; Chan J; Davarpanah Jazi S; Heath M
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Apr; 234(4):945-54. PubMed ID: 26680769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vision for action and perception elicit dissociable adherence to Weber's law across a range of 'graspable' target objects.
    Heath M; Manzone J; Khan M; Davarpanah Jazi S
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Oct; 235(10):3003-3012. PubMed ID: 28721517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Manual estimations of functionally graspable target objects adhere to Weber's law.
    Heath M; Manzone J
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 235(6):1701-1707. PubMed ID: 28280878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Grasping without vision: time normalizing grip aperture profiles yields spurious grip scaling to target size.
    Whitwell RL; Goodale MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Aug; 51(10):1878-87. PubMed ID: 23796704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pantomime-grasping: the 'return' of haptic feedback supports the absolute specification of object size.
    Davarpanah Jazi S; Yau M; Westwood DA; Heath M
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jul; 233(7):2029-40. PubMed ID: 25869741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Weber's law in 2D and 3D grasping.
    Ozana A; Ganel T
    Psychol Res; 2019 Jul; 83(5):977-988. PubMed ID: 28871420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Semantic grasping escapes Weber's law.
    Löwenkamp C; Gärtner W; Haus ID; Franz VH
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Apr; 70():235-45. PubMed ID: 25731904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Not only perception but also grasping actions can obey Weber's law.
    Derzsi Z; Volcic R
    Cognition; 2023 Aug; 237():105465. PubMed ID: 37150154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.