These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21194582)
1. The influence of cantilever length and implant inclination on stress distribution in maxillary implant-supported fixed dentures. Bevilacqua M; Tealdo T; Menini M; Pera F; Mossolov A; Drago C; Pera P J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jan; 105(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 21194582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stress patterns on implants in prostheses supported by four or six implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Silva GC; Mendonça JA; Lopes LR; Landre J Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 20369081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical comparison of axial and tilted implants for mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses. Kim KS; Kim YL; Bae JM; Cho HW Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):976-84. PubMed ID: 22010079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical effects of two different collar implant structures on stress distribution under cantilever fixed partial dentures. Merıç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; özden AU Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Nov; 69(6):374-84. PubMed ID: 21449688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cortical bone stress distribution in mandibles with different configurations restored with prefabricated bar-prosthesis protocol: a three-dimensional finite-element analysis. de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Assunção WG; Júnior AC; Anchieta RB J Prosthodont; 2011 Jan; 20(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 21087340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures. Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of arch shape and implant position on stress distribution around implants supporting fixed full-arch prosthesis in edentulous maxilla. Sagat G; Yalcin S; Gultekin BA; Mijiritsky E Implant Dent; 2010 Dec; 19(6):498-508. PubMed ID: 21119354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of implant design on the stress distribution in a three-unit implant-supported distal cantilever fixed partial denture: a three-dimensional finite-element analysis. Koka P; Mohapatra A; Anandapandian PA; Murugesan K; Vasanthakumar M Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 22945697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A finite element analysis of tilted versus nontilted implant configurations in the edentulous maxilla. Bellini CM; Romeo D; Galbusera F; Agliardi E; Pietrabissa R; Zampelis A; Francetti L Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):155-7. PubMed ID: 19418861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of the rigidity of a provisional restoration supported on four immediately loaded implants in the edentulous maxilla on biomechanical bone-implant interactions under simulated bruxism conditions: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Yamaguchi K; Ishiura Y; Tanaka S; Baba K Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):442-50. PubMed ID: 25191887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Immediate function with fixed implant-supported maxillary dentures: a 12-month pilot study. Tealdo T; Bevilacqua M; Pera F; Menini M; Ravera G; Drago C; Pera P J Prosthet Dent; 2008 May; 99(5):351-60. PubMed ID: 18456046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of load transmission using different implant inclinations and cantilever lengths. Bevilacqua M; Tealdo T; Pera F; Menini M; Mossolov A; Drago C; Pera P Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):539-42. PubMed ID: 19149073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: a two-dimensional finite element analysis. Zampelis A; Rangert B; Heijl L J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S35-43. PubMed ID: 17618932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Finite element analysis of stress in bone adjacent to dental implants. Rubo JH; Souza EA J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(5):248-55. PubMed ID: 19170290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of cusp inclination on stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses. A three-dimensional finite element analysis. Falcón-Antenucci RM; Pellizzer EP; de Carvalho PS; Goiato MC; Noritomi PY J Prosthodont; 2010 Jul; 19(5):381-6. PubMed ID: 20345742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature. Geng JP; Tan KB; Liu GR J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):585-98. PubMed ID: 11404759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical aspects of two different implant-prosthetic concepts for edentulous maxillae. Benzing UR; Gall H; Weber H Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(2):188-98. PubMed ID: 7744438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Finite element stress analysis of edentulous mandibles with different bone types supporting multiple-implant superstructures. de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Freitas MM Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1108-14. PubMed ID: 21197486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implant-bone load transfer mechanisms in complete-arch prostheses supported by four implants: a three-dimensional finite element approach. Baggi L; Pastore S; Di Girolamo M; Vairo G J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jan; 109(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 23328192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tilting of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants for improved prosthesis support. Krekmanov L; Kahn M; Rangert B; Lindström H Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(3):405-14. PubMed ID: 10874806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]