These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21194599)

  • 1. Systematic reviews: When the published literature is the data.
    Lyles A
    Clin Ther; 2010 Sep; 32(10):1754-5. PubMed ID: 21194599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study.
    Egger M; Juni P; Bartlett C; Holenstein F; Sterne J
    Health Technol Assess; 2003; 7(1):1-76. PubMed ID: 12583822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reporting and interpreting results of systematic reviews.
    Harvey L; Wyndaele JJ
    Spinal Cord; 2009 Nov; 47(11):777. PubMed ID: 19890366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the new age of transparency.
    Honig PK
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2010 Aug; 88(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 20648031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Errors in the conduct of systematic reviews of pharmacological interventions for irritable bowel syndrome.
    Ford AC; Guyatt GH; Talley NJ; Moayyedi P
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Feb; 105(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 19920807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Meta-analyses of small numbers of trials often agree with longer-term results.
    Herbison P; Hay-Smith J; Gillespie WJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Feb; 64(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 20609563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Clinical decision-making: systematic reviews and meta-analysis].
    Fernández Pérez C
    Neurologia; 2003 Mar; 18(2):70-3. PubMed ID: 12610756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Leucht S; Kissling W; Davis JM
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2009 Jun; 119(6):443-50. PubMed ID: 19469725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Five easy pieces on evidence-based medicine (4).
    Kalso E; Edwards J; McQuay HJ; Moore RA
    Eur J Pain; 2002; 6(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 11888232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Duplicate publication a way of embellishing research results. Unethical misuse which threatens the validity of systematic reviews and meta-analysis].
    Eliasson M
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Aug; 97(32-33):3454-6. PubMed ID: 11037585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Montori VM; Swiontkowski MF; Cook DJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Aug; (413):43-54. PubMed ID: 12897595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence-based practice: how to perform and use systematic reviews for clinical decision-making.
    Kranke P
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Sep; 27(9):763-72. PubMed ID: 20523217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Primer: strengths and weaknesses of meta-analysis.
    Finckh A; Tramèr MR
    Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol; 2008 Mar; 4(3):146-52. PubMed ID: 18227829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A practical guide to understanding systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Neely JG; Magit AE; Rich JT; Voelker CC; Wang EW; Paniello RC; Nussenbaum B; Bradley JP
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Jan; 142(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 20096216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
    Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sources of evidence for systematic reviews of interventions in diabetes.
    Royle PL; Bain L; Waugh NR
    Diabet Med; 2005 Oct; 22(10):1386-93. PubMed ID: 16176201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
    Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Updating systematic reviews--when and how?
    Tugwell P; Knottnerus A; Idzerda L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 64(9):933-5. PubMed ID: 21784320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Clinical trials (III). The publication of the results].
    Pascual J; de Pablo I; Gálvez MA; Hernández D
    Nefrologia; 2006; 26(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 16649423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.