These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21194643)
1. The problem of plagiarism. Anderson MS; Steneck NH Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 21194643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. From Baltimore to Bell Labs: reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct. Resnik DB Account Res; 2003; 10(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 14577424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Federal actions against plagiarism in research. Price AR J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):34-51. PubMed ID: 11653389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evolving research misconduct policies and their significance for physical scientists. Dooley JJ; Kerch HM Sci Eng Ethics; 2000 Jan; 6(1):109-21. PubMed ID: 11273428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Profits and plagiarism: the case of medical ghostwriting. Anekwe TD Bioethics; 2010 Jul; 24(6):267-72. PubMed ID: 19222448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct. Sovacool BK Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):W1-7. PubMed ID: 16179287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The definition of misconduct in science: a view from NSF. Buzzelli DE Science; 1993 Jan; 259(5095):584-5, 647-8. PubMed ID: 8430300 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The logical geography of concepts and shared responsibilities concerning research misconduct. Guenin LM Acad Med; 1996 Jun; 71(6):595-603. PubMed ID: 9125915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Research misconduct definitions adopted by U.S. research institutions. Resnik DB; Neal T; Raymond A; Kissling GE Account Res; 2015; 22(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 25275621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. HHS proposes revised regulations on misconduct in research. Shalev M Lab Anim (NY); 2004 Jun; 33(6):12-3. PubMed ID: 15179427 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. US panel rejects hiding source of allegations of misconduct. Anderson C Nature; 1992 Oct; 359(6398):765. PubMed ID: 1436045 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. PHS perspectives on misconduct in science. Brandt EN Public Health Rep; 1983; 98(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 6856737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ruling brings cash windfall in US fraud case. Dalton R Nature; 1995 May; 375(6529):270. PubMed ID: 7753183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Perspective: research misconduct: the search for a remedy. Kornfeld DS Acad Med; 2012 Jul; 87(7):877-82. PubMed ID: 22622208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Iranian ministers in plagiarism row. Butler D Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7264):578-9. PubMed ID: 19794465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct: perspectives from a federal government viewpoint. Price AR J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):286-97. PubMed ID: 11653365 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Scientific fraud. A disease we find among ourselves]. Guimarães S Acta Med Port; 1998; 11(8-9):783-5. PubMed ID: 9951073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Plagiarism. Document from the Ethics Commission of the Medical School, University of Chile]. Rosselot Jaramillo E; Bravo Lechat M; Kottow Lang M; Valenzuela Yuraidini C; O'Ryan Gallardo M; Thambo Becker S; Horwitz Campos N; Acevedo Pérez I; Rueda Castro L; Sotomayor MA; Rev Med Chil; 2008 May; 136(5):653-8. PubMed ID: 18769815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Seven ways to plagiarize: handling real allegations of research misconduct. Loui MC Sci Eng Ethics; 2002 Oct; 8(4):529-39. PubMed ID: 12501721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]