28 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21194815)
1. Effectiveness of creating digital twins with different digital dentition models and cone-beam computed tomography.
Lee JH; Lee HL; Park IY; On SW; Byun SH; Yang BE
Sci Rep; 2023 Jun; 13(1):10603. PubMed ID: 37391453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Case of Third Dentition.
West J Med Surg; 1845 Sep; 4(3):257-258. PubMed ID: 38208847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of the reproducibility and accuracy of the Visia
Henseler H
GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW; 2023; 12():Doc07. PubMed ID: 38024101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Soft tissue coverage on the segmentation accuracy of the 3D surface-rendered model from cone-beam CT.
Dusseldorp JK; Stamatakis HC; Ren Y
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Apr; 21(3):921-930. PubMed ID: 27206862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A cone-beam computed tomography triple scan procedure to obtain a three-dimensional augmented virtual skull model appropriate for orthognathic surgery planning.
Swennen GR; Mollemans W; De Clercq C; Abeloos J; Lamoral P; Lippens F; Neyt N; Casselman J; Schutyser F
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 20(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 19276829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Orthognathic positioning system: intraoperative system to transfer virtual surgical plan to operating field during orthognathic surgery.
Polley JW; Figueroa AA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 May; 71(5):911-20. PubMed ID: 23312847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Virtual surgical planning for orthognathic surgery using digital data transfer and an intraoral fiducial marker: the charlotte method.
Bobek S; Farrell B; Choi C; Farrell B; Weimer K; Tucker M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 73(6):1143-58. PubMed ID: 25795181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A novel approach for planning orthognathic surgery: the integration of dental casts into three-dimensional printed mandibular models.
Ayoub AF; Rehab M; O'Neil M; Khambay B; Ju X; Barbenel J; Naudi K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 43(4):454-9. PubMed ID: 24091003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new method to move mandible to intercuspal position in virtual three-dimensional orthognathic surgery by integrating primary occlusion model.
Dai J; Wang X; Hu G; Shen SG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 70(9):e484-9. PubMed ID: 22907113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of a new method for building a three-dimensional physical model of the skull and dentition.
O'Neil M; Khambay B; Bowman A; Moos KF; Barbenel J; Walker F; Ayoub A
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 50(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 21194815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital three-dimensional image fusion processes for planning and evaluating orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. A systematic review.
Plooij JM; Maal TJ; Haers P; Borstlap WA; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Bergé SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 40(4):341-52. PubMed ID: 21095103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Update on cone beam technology and orthodontic analysis.
Kau CH; Li JL; Li Q; Abou Kheir N
Dent Clin North Am; 2014 Jul; 58(3):653-69. PubMed ID: 24993927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
