These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

431 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21194865)

  • 21. The diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography compared with stress nuclear imaging in emergency department low-risk chest pain patients.
    Gallagher MJ; Ross MA; Raff GL; Goldstein JA; O'Neill WW; O'Neil B
    Ann Emerg Med; 2007 Feb; 49(2):125-36. PubMed ID: 16978738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. CT detection of myocardial blood volume deficits: dual-energy CT compared with single-energy CT spectra.
    Arnoldi E; Lee YS; Ruzsics B; Weininger M; Spears JR; Rowley CP; Chiaramida SA; Costello P; Reiser MF; Schoepf UJ
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2011; 5(6):421-9. PubMed ID: 22146501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Direct comparison of rest and adenosine stress myocardial perfusion CT with rest and stress SPECT.
    Okada DR; Ghoshhajra BB; Blankstein R; Rocha-Filho JA; Shturman LD; Rogers IS; Bezerra HG; Sarwar A; Gewirtz H; Hoffmann U; Mamuya WS; Brady TJ; Cury RC
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2010; 17(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 19936863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Diagnostic performance of combined noninvasive anatomic and functional assessment with dual-source CT and adenosine-induced stress dual-energy CT for detection of significant coronary stenosis.
    Ko SM; Choi JW; Hwang HK; Song MG; Shin JK; Chee HK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Mar; 198(3):512-20. PubMed ID: 22357990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quantitative whole heart stress perfusion CT imaging as noninvasive assessment of hemodynamics in coronary artery stenosis: preliminary animal experience.
    Mahnken AH; Klotz E; Pietsch H; Schmidt B; Allmendinger T; Haberland U; Kalender WA; Flohr T
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Jun; 45(6):298-305. PubMed ID: 20421799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of dual-energy computed tomography of the heart with single photon emission computed tomography for assessment of coronary artery stenosis and of the myocardial blood supply.
    Ruzsics B; Schwarz F; Schoepf UJ; Lee YS; Bastarrika G; Chiaramida SA; Costello P; Zwerner PL
    Am J Cardiol; 2009 Aug; 104(3):318-26. PubMed ID: 19616661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cost-effectiveness of substituting dual-energy CT for SPECT in the assessment of myocardial perfusion for the workup of coronary artery disease.
    Meyer M; Nance JW; Schoepf UJ; Moscariello A; Weininger M; Rowe GW; Ruzsics B; Kang DK; Chiaramida SA; Schoenberg SO; Fink C; Henzler T
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):3719-25. PubMed ID: 21277132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The influence of clinical and acquisition parameters on the interpretability of adenosine stress myocardial computed tomography perfusion.
    van Rosendael AR; de Graaf MA; Dimitriu-Leen AC; van Zwet EW; van den Hoogen IJ; Kharbanda RK; Bax JJ; Kroft LJ; Scholte AJ
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Feb; 18(2):203-211. PubMed ID: 27013247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Detection of ischaemic myocardial lesions with coronary CT angiography and adenosine-stress dynamic perfusion imaging using a 128-slice dual-source CT: diagnostic performance in comparison with cardiac MRI.
    Kim SM; Choi JH; Chang SA; Choe YH
    Br J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 86(1032):20130481. PubMed ID: 24096592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Can the unenhanced phase be eliminated from dual-phase CT angiography for chest pain? Implications for diagnostic accuracy in acute aortic intramural hematoma.
    Lemos AA; Pezzullo JC; Fasani P; Gullo M; Giannitto C; Lo Gullo R; Biondetti PR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Dec; 203(6):1171-80. PubMed ID: 25415694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Quantitative Analysis of Iodine Image of Dual-energy Computed Tomography at Rest: Comparison With 99mTc-Tetrofosmin Stress-rest Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging as the Reference Standard.
    Nakahara T; Toyama T; Jinzaki M; Seki R; Saito Y; Higuchi T; Yamada M; Arai M; Tsushima Y; Kuribayashi S; Kurabayashi M
    J Thorac Imaging; 2018 Mar; 33(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 28622166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of myocardial CT perfusion in patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department: comparison with SPECT-myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Feuchtner GM; Plank F; Pena C; Battle J; Min J; Leipsic J; Labounty T; Janowitz W; Katzen B; Ziffer J; Cury RC
    Heart; 2012 Oct; 98(20):1510-7. PubMed ID: 22895647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cost-effectiveness of coronary CT angiography versus myocardial perfusion SPECT for evaluation of patients with chest pain and no known coronary artery disease.
    Min JK; Gilmore A; Budoff MJ; Berman DS; O'Day K
    Radiology; 2010 Mar; 254(3):801-8. PubMed ID: 20177094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of stress perfusion MRI and SPECT for detection of myocardial ischemia in patients with angiographically proven three-vessel coronary artery disease.
    Chung SY; Lee KY; Chun EJ; Lee WW; Park EK; Chang HJ; Choi SI
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Aug; 195(2):356-62. PubMed ID: 20651190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Diagnostic Performance of First-Pass Myocardial Perfusion Imaging without Stress with Computed Tomography (CT) Compared with Coronary CT Angiography Alone, with Fractional Flow Reserve as the Reference Standard.
    Osawa K; Miyoshi T; Miki T; Koyama Y; Sato S; Kanazawa S; Ito H
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149170. PubMed ID: 26894686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Functionally relevant coronary artery disease: comparison of 64-section CT angiography with myocardial perfusion SPECT.
    Gaemperli O; Schepis T; Valenta I; Koepfli P; Husmann L; Scheffel H; Leschka S; Eberli FR; Luscher TF; Alkadhi H; Kaufmann PA
    Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):414-23. PubMed ID: 18552310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Noncalcified atherosclerotic plaque burden at coronary CT angiography: a better predictor of ischemia at stress myocardial perfusion imaging than calcium score and stenosis severity.
    Bauer RW; Thilo C; Chiaramida SA; Vogl TJ; Costello P; Schoepf UJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Aug; 193(2):410-8. PubMed ID: 19620437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.
    Ko BS; Cameron JD; Meredith IT; Leung M; Antonis PR; Nasis A; Crossett M; Hope SA; Lehman SJ; Troupis J; DeFrance T; Seneviratne SK
    Eur Heart J; 2012 Jan; 33(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 21810860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Three-dimensional quantification of myocardial perfusion during regadenoson stress computed tomography.
    Mor-Avi V; Kachenoura N; Maffessanti F; Bhave NM; Port S; Lodato JA; Chandra S; Freed BH; Lang RM; Patel AR
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 May; 85(5):885-92. PubMed ID: 27130047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Optimal timing for first-pass stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Bischoff B; Bamberg F; Marcus R; Schwarz F; Becker HC; Becker A; Reiser M; Nikolaou K
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Feb; 29(2):435-42. PubMed ID: 22714549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.