These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21195861)
1. Re: Williams et al.: Radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: likelihood of positive surgical margin(s) (Urology 2010;76:1097-1101). Soloway MS Urology; 2011 Jan; 77(1):263-4. PubMed ID: 21195861 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Re: Williams et al.: Radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: likelihood of positive surgical margin(s) (Urology 2010;76:1097-1101). Guillonneau B Urology; 2011 Jan; 77(1):262-3; author reply 263-4. PubMed ID: 21195859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: likelihood of positive surgical margin(s). Williams SB; Chen MH; D'Amico AV; Weinberg AC; Kacker R; Hirsch MS; Richie JP; Hu JC Urology; 2010 Nov; 76(5):1097-101. PubMed ID: 20303147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Re: A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J. A. Smith, Jr., R. C. Chan, S. S. Chang, S. D. Herrell, P. E. Clark, R. Baumgartner and M. S. Cookson. J Urol 2007; 178: 2385-2390. Canes D J Urol; 2008 Jul; 180(1):410-1; author reply 411. PubMed ID: 18499156 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival. Barocas DA; Salem S; Kordan Y; Herrell SD; Chang SS; Clark PE; Davis R; Baumgartner R; Phillips S; Cookson MS; Smith JA J Urol; 2010 Mar; 183(3):990-6. PubMed ID: 20083261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins. Trabulsi EJ; Linden RA; Gomella LG; McGinnis DE; Strup SE; Lallas CD Can J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(2):3994-9. PubMed ID: 18405448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Nelson B; Kaufman M; Broughton G; Cookson MS; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Baumgartner RG; Smith JA J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):929-31. PubMed ID: 17296378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Re: A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy: J. A. Smith, Jr., R. C. Chan, S. S. Chang, S. D. Herrell, P. E. Clark, R. Baumgartner and M. S. Cookson. J Urol 2007; 178: 2385-2390. Masieri L; Minervini A; Serni S; Carini M J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):2257; author reply 2257. PubMed ID: 18823916 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Margin control in robotic and laparoscopic prostatectomy: what are the REAL outcomes? Weizer AZ; Strope S; Wood DP Urol Oncol; 2010; 28(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 20219561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic and radical retropubic prostatectomy generate similar positive margin rates in low and intermediate risk patients. Laurila TA; Huang W; Jarrard DF Urol Oncol; 2009; 27(5):529-33. PubMed ID: 18640061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Re: White et al.: Comparative analysis of surgical margins between radical retropubic prostatectomy and RALP: Are patients sacrificed during initiation of robotic program? (Urology 2009;73:567-571). Otto T; Gerullis H; Theuerkauf I Urology; 2009 Aug; 74(2):475-6; author reply 476. PubMed ID: 19646635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of transfusion requirements between open and robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Kordan Y; Barocas DA; Altamar HO; Clark PE; Chang SS; Davis R; Herrell SD; Baumgartner R; Mishra V; Chan RC; Smith JA; Cookson MS BJU Int; 2010 Oct; 106(7):1036-40. PubMed ID: 20151960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Open versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: which is better? Wilson T; Torrey R Curr Opin Urol; 2011 May; 21(3):200-5. PubMed ID: 21427586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience. Rozet F; Jaffe J; Braud G; Harmon J; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of prostate weight on probability of positive surgical margins in patients with low-risk prostate cancer after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Marchetti PE; Shikanov S; Razmaria AA; Zagaja GP; Shalhav AL Urology; 2011 Mar; 77(3):677-81. PubMed ID: 21071070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a report of the current state. Patel VR; Shah K; Palmer KJ; Thaly R; Coughlin G Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2007 Sep; 7(9):1269-78. PubMed ID: 17892427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective evaluation of short-term impact and recovery of health related quality of life in men undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical prostatectomy. Miller J; Smith A; Kouba E; Wallen E; Pruthi RS J Urol; 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):854-8; discussion 859. PubMed ID: 17631338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]