406 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21196094)
1. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners.
Pauwels R; Beinsberger J; Collaert B; Theodorakou C; Rogers J; Walker A; Cockmartin L; Bosmans H; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Horner K;
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 81(2):267-71. PubMed ID: 21196094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of radiation exposure in dental cone-beam computerized tomography with the use of metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) dosimeters and Monte Carlo simulations.
Koivisto J; Kiljunen T; Tapiovaara M; Wolff J; Kortesniemi M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Sep; 114(3):393-400. PubMed ID: 22862982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effective dosages for recording Veraviewepocs dental panoramic images: analog film, digital, and panoramic scout for CBCT.
Garcia Silva MA; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Gründler K; Visser H; Hirsch E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):571-7. PubMed ID: 18602314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications.
Loubele M; Bogaerts R; Van Dijck E; Pauwels R; Vanheusden S; Suetens P; Marchal G; Sanderink G; Jacobs R
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):461-8. PubMed ID: 18639404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effective radiation dose of ProMax 3D cone-beam computerized tomography scanner with different dental protocols.
Qu XM; Li G; Ludlow JB; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Dec; 110(6):770-6. PubMed ID: 20952220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetry of a cone-beam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging.
Grünheid T; Kolbeck Schieck JR; Pliska BT; Ahmad M; Larson BE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):436-43. PubMed ID: 22464525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view.
Hirsch E; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Silva MA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 18606748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners.
Suomalainen A; Kiljunen T; Käser Y; Peltola J; Kortesniemi M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):367-78. PubMed ID: 19700530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of the effective dose in supine, prone, and oblique positions in the maxillofacial region using a novel combined extremity and maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography scanner.
Koivisto J; Wolff J; Järnstedt J; Dastidar P; Kortesniemi M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2014 Sep; 118(3):355-62. PubMed ID: 25151590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cone beam computed tomography and low-dose multislice computed tomography in orthodontics and dentistry: a comparative evaluation on image quality and radiation exposure.
Hofmann E; Schmid M; Lell M; Hirschfelder U
J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Sep; 75(5):384-98. PubMed ID: 25158951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiation dose from cone beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy.
Kan MW; Leung LH; Wong W; Lam N
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jan; 70(1):272-9. PubMed ID: 17980510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using GafChromic film to estimate the effective dose from dental cone beam CT and panoramic radiography.
Al-Okshi A; Nilsson M; Petersson A; Wiese M; Lindh C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(7):20120343. PubMed ID: 23610090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Absorbed and effective doses from cone beam volumetric imaging for implant planning.
Okano T; Harata Y; Sugihara Y; Sakaino R; Tsuchida R; Iwai K; Seki K; Araki K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Feb; 38(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 19176649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of a Monte Carlo simulation for dose assessment in dental cone beam CT examinations.
Morant JJ; Salvadó M; Casanovas R; Hernández-Girón I; Velasco E; Calzado A
Phys Med; 2012 Jul; 28(3):200-9. PubMed ID: 21807542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Two examples of indication specific radiation dose calculations in dental CBCT and Multidetector CT scanners.
Stratis A; Zhang G; Lopez-Rendon X; Politis C; Hermans R; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Shaheen E; Bosmans H
Phys Med; 2017 Sep; 41():71-77. PubMed ID: 28392311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Dosimetry of cone-beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography scanning for temporal bone].
Xie XY; Zhang ZY; Wang Z; Yin GX; Jia SM
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jun; 98(23):1837-1840. PubMed ID: 29925165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimation of paediatric organ and effective doses from dental cone beam CT using anthropomorphic phantoms.
Theodorakou C; Walker A; Horner K; Pauwels R; Bogaerts R; Jacobs R;
Br J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 85(1010):153-60. PubMed ID: 22308220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Cross-sectional imaging in dentomaxillofacial diagnostics: dose comparison of dental MSCT and NewTom 9000 DVT].
Coppenrath E; Draenert F; Lechel U; Veit R; Meindl T; Reiser M; Mueller-Lisse U
Rofo; 2008 May; 180(5):396-401. PubMed ID: 18543414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Calculating effective dose on a cone beam computed tomography device: 3D Accuitomo and 3D Accuitomo FPD.
Lofthag-Hansen S; Thilander-Klang A; Ekestubbe A; Helmrot E; Gröndahl K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Feb; 37(2):72-9. PubMed ID: 18239034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of spatial and contrast resolution for cone-beam computed tomography scanners.
Pauwels R; Beinsberger J; Stamatakis H; Tsiklakis K; Walker A; Bosmans H; Bogaerts R; Jacobs R; Horner K;
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Jul; 114(1):127-35. PubMed ID: 22727102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
