249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21196549)
1. Does the use of laminar flow and space suits reduce early deep infection after total hip and knee replacement?: the ten-year results of the New Zealand Joint Registry.
Hooper GJ; Rothwell AG; Frampton C; Wyatt MC
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Jan; 93(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 21196549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Revision following cemented and uncemented primary total hip replacement: a seven-year analysis from the New Zealand Joint Registry.
Hooper GJ; Rothwell AG; Stringer M; Frampton C
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Apr; 91(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 19336803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An analysis of the Oxford hip and knee scores and their relationship to early joint revision in the New Zealand Joint Registry.
Rothwell AG; Hooper GJ; Hobbs A; Frampton CM
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Mar; 92(3):413-8. PubMed ID: 20190314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of patient and surgical factors on the rate of infection after primary total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of 64,566 joints from the New Zealand Joint Registry.
Tayton ER; Frampton C; Hooper GJ; Young SW
Bone Joint J; 2016 Mar; 98-B(3):334-40. PubMed ID: 26920958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk of revision for infection in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with osteoarthritis: a prospective, population-based study on 108,786 hip and knee joint arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
Schrama JC; Espehaug B; Hallan G; Engesaeter LB; Furnes O; Havelin LI; Fevang BT
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken); 2010 Apr; 62(4):473-9. PubMed ID: 20391501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Primary hip and knee arthroplasty in a temporary operating theatre is associated with a significant increase in deep periprosthetic infection.
Bloch BV; Shah A; Snape SE; Boswell TCJ; James PJ
Bone Joint J; 2017 Jul; 99-B(7):917-920. PubMed ID: 28663397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The economics of using prophylactic antibiotic-loaded bone cement in total knee replacement.
Gutowski CJ; Zmistowski BM; Clyde CT; Parvizi J
Bone Joint J; 2014 Jan; 96-B(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 24395313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of air exhausts for surgical body suits (space suits) and the potential for periprosthetic joint infection.
Ling F; Halabi S; Jones C
J Hosp Infect; 2018 Jul; 99(3):279-283. PubMed ID: 29559232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of laminar air-flow on the results of Austin-Moore hemiarthroplasty.
Kakwani RG; Yohannan D; Wahab KH
Injury; 2007 Jul; 38(7):820-3. PubMed ID: 17157847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The risk of peri-prosthetic fracture after primary and revision total hip and knee replacement.
Meek RM; Norwood T; Smith R; Brenkel IJ; Howie CR
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Jan; 93(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 21196551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does laminar airflow make a difference to the infection rates for lower limb arthroplasty: a study using the National Joint Registry and local surgical site infection data for two hospitals with and without laminar airflow.
Singh S; Reddy S; Shrivastava R
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):261-265. PubMed ID: 27687918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Survival and functional outcome after revision of a unicompartmental to a total knee replacement: the New Zealand National Joint Registry.
Pearse AJ; Hooper GJ; Rothwell A; Frampton C
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Apr; 92(4):508-12. PubMed ID: 20357326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation and treatment of infection at the site of a total hip or knee arthroplasty.
Hanssen AD; Rand JA
Instr Course Lect; 1999; 48():111-22. PubMed ID: 10098033
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of measures to decrease intra-operative bacterial contamination in orthopaedic implant surgery.
Knobben BA; van Horn JR; van der Mei HC; Busscher HJ
J Hosp Infect; 2006 Feb; 62(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 16343691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rehospitalizations, early revisions, infections, and hospital resource use in the first year after hip and knee arthroplasties.
Bohm ER; Dunbar MJ; Frood JJ; Johnson TM; Morris KA
J Arthroplasty; 2012 Feb; 27(2):232-237.e1. PubMed ID: 21752579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors affecting the incidence of infection in hip and knee replacement: an analysis of 5277 cases.
Willis-Owen CA; Konyves A; Martin DK
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Aug; 92(8):1128-33. PubMed ID: 20675759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Infection in total knee replacement: a retrospective review of 6489 total knee replacements.
Peersman G; Laskin R; Davis J; Peterson M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2001 Nov; (392):15-23. PubMed ID: 11716377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A critique of revision rate as an outcome measure: re-interpretation of knee joint registry data.
Goodfellow JW; O'Connor JJ; Murray DW
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Dec; 92(12):1628-31. PubMed ID: 21119165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
Lucht U
Acta Orthop Scand; 2000 Oct; 71(5):433-9. PubMed ID: 11186396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Revision total hip and knee replacement.
Barnett AJ; Toms AD
Clin Geriatr Med; 2012 Aug; 28(3):431-46. PubMed ID: 22840306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
