These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21196951)

  • 61. Lexical selection is not by competition: a reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm.
    Mahon BZ; Costa A; Peterson R; Vargas KA; Caramazza A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):503-35. PubMed ID: 17470003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Does word length affect speech onset latencies when producing single words?
    Damian MF; Bowers JS; Stadthagen-Gonzalez H; Spalek K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):892-905. PubMed ID: 20565208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Enhanced phonological facilitation and traces of concurrent word form activation in speech production: an object-naming study with multiple distractors.
    Abdel Rahman R; Melinger A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Sep; 61(9):1410-40. PubMed ID: 19086192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Electrophysiology of cross-language interference and facilitation in picture naming.
    Roelofs A; Piai V; Garrido Rodriguez G; Chwilla DJ
    Cortex; 2016 Mar; 76():1-16. PubMed ID: 26820686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm.
    Costa A; Alario FX; Caramazza A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Feb; 12(1):125-31. PubMed ID: 15948287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Grammatical-gender effects in noun-noun compound production: Evidence from German.
    Lorenz A; Mädebach A; Jescheniak JD
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 May; 71(5):1134-1149. PubMed ID: 28335686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Distractor strength and selective attention in picture-naming performance.
    Piai V; Roelofs A; Schriefers H
    Mem Cognit; 2012 May; 40(4):614-27. PubMed ID: 22200912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production.
    Damian MF; Martin RC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 Mar; 25(2):345-61. PubMed ID: 10093206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Planning at the phonological level during sentence production.
    Schnur TT; Costa A; Caramazza A
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2006 Mar; 35(2):189-213. PubMed ID: 16502144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. The shape of things to come in speech production: Visual form interference during lexical access.
    de Zubicaray GI; McLean M; Oppermann F; Hegarty A; McMahon K; Jescheniak JD
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Sep; 71(9):1921-1938. PubMed ID: 28805133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Semantic interference in a delayed naming task: evidence for the response exclusion hypothesis.
    Janssen N; Schirm W; Mahon BZ; Caramazza A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):249-56. PubMed ID: 18194068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Neighing, barking, and drumming horses-object related sounds help and hinder picture naming.
    Mädebach A; Wöhner S; Kieseler ML; Jescheniak JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1629-1646. PubMed ID: 28414498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Neural dynamics of object noun, action verb and action noun production in picture naming.
    Fargier R; Laganaro M
    Brain Lang; 2015 Nov; 150():129-42. PubMed ID: 26433472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Lexical competition during second-language listening: sentence context, but not proficiency, constrains interference from the native lexicon.
    Chambers CG; Cooke H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):1029-40. PubMed ID: 19586268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. The effects of processing requirements on neurophysiological responses to spoken sentences.
    Connolly JF; Stewart SH; Phillips NA
    Brain Lang; 1990 Aug; 39(2):302-18. PubMed ID: 2224497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Single-word predictions of upcoming language during comprehension: Evidence from the cumulative semantic interference task.
    Kleinman D; Runnqvist E; Ferreira VS
    Cogn Psychol; 2015 Jun; 79():68-101. PubMed ID: 25917550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. The dynamic microstructure of speech production: semantic interference built on the fly.
    Abdel Rahman R; Melinger A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):149-61. PubMed ID: 20854006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Temporal dynamics of activation of thematic and functional knowledge during conceptual processing of manipulable artifacts.
    Kalénine S; Mirman D; Middleton EL; Buxbaum LJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1274-95. PubMed ID: 22449134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading.
    Hoeks JC; Stowe LA; Doedens G
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 19(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 14972359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. BONEs not CATs attract DOGs: Semantic context effects for picture naming in the lesioned language network.
    Pino D; Mädebach A; Jescheniak JD; Regenbrecht F; Obrig H
    Neuroimage; 2022 Feb; 246():118767. PubMed ID: 34856377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.