197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21197525)
1. Comparison of high-fluence, single-pass diode laser to low-fluence, multiple-pass diode laser for laser hair reduction with 18 months of follow up.
Braun M
J Drugs Dermatol; 2011 Jan; 10(1):62-5. PubMed ID: 21197525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Permanent laser hair removal with low fluence high repetition rate versus high fluence low repetition rate 810 nm diode laser--a split leg comparison study.
Braun M
J Drugs Dermatol; 2009 Nov; 8(11 Suppl):s14-7. PubMed ID: 19916262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of two 810 diode lasers for hair removal: low fluence, multiple pass versus a high fluence, single pass technique.
Koo B; Ball K; Tremaine AM; Zachary CB
Lasers Surg Med; 2014 Apr; 46(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 24752608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Safety and efficacy of low-fluence, high-repetition rate versus high-fluence, low-repetition rate 810-nm diode laser for permanent hair removal--a split-face comparison study.
Pai GS; Bhat PS; Mallya H; Gold M
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2011 Aug; 13(4):134-7. PubMed ID: 21692640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Low fluence-high repetition rate diode laser hair removal 12-month evaluation: reducing pain and risks while keeping clinical efficacy.
Barolet D
Lasers Surg Med; 2012 Apr; 44(4):277-81. PubMed ID: 22437967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hair structures are effectively altered during 810 nm diode laser hair epilation at low fluences.
Trelles MA; Urdiales F; Al-Zarouni M
J Dermatolog Treat; 2010 Mar; 21(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 19585319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A split axilla comparison study of axillary hair removal with low fluence high repetition rate 810 nm diode laser vs. high fluence low repetition rate 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser.
Wanitphakdeedecha R; Thanomkitti K; Sethabutra P; Eimpunth S; Manuskiatti W
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2012 Sep; 26(9):1133-6. PubMed ID: 21923659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Split-leg comparison of low fluence diode laser and high fluence intense pulsed light in permanent hair reduction in skin types III to IV.
Chen J; Liu XJ; Huo MH
Australas J Dermatol; 2012 Aug; 53(3):186-9. PubMed ID: 22881465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term clinical evaluation of a 800-nm long-pulsed diode laser with a large spot size and vacuum-assisted suction for hair removal.
Ibrahimi OA; Kilmer SL
Dermatol Surg; 2012 Jun; 38(6):912-7. PubMed ID: 22455549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term Comparison of a Large Spot Vacuum Assisted Handpiece vs the Small Spot Size Traditional Handpiece of the 800 nm Diode Laser.
Youssef NJ; Rizk AG; Ibrahimi OA; Tannous ZS
J Drugs Dermatol; 2017 Sep; 16(9):893-898. PubMed ID: 28915284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A 12-month follow-up of hypopigmentation after laser hair removal.
Fontana CR; Bonini D; Bagnato VS
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2013 Apr; 15(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 23384006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of long-pulsed alexandrite and Nd:YAG lasers, individually and in combination, for leg hair reduction: an assessor-blinded, randomized trial with 18 months of follow-up.
Davoudi SM; Behnia F; Gorouhi F; Keshavarz S; Nassiri Kashani M; Rashighi Firoozabadi M; Firooz A
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1323-7. PubMed ID: 18936396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hair removal with an 800-nm pulsed diode laser.
Campos VB; Dierickx CC; Farinelli WA; Lin TY; Manuskiatti W; Anderson RR
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2000 Sep; 43(3):442-7. PubMed ID: 10954655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between sequentional treatment with diode and alexandrite lasers versus alexandrite laser alone in the treatment of hirsutism.
Nilforoushzadeh MA; Naieni FF; Siadat AH; Rad L
J Drugs Dermatol; 2011 Nov; 10(11):1255-9. PubMed ID: 22052304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Permanent hair reduction with a home-use diode laser: Safety and effectiveness 1 year after eight treatments.
Wheeland RG
Lasers Surg Med; 2012 Sep; 44(7):550-7. PubMed ID: 22886431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of hair reduction with three lasers and light sources: prospective, blinded and controlled study.
Sochor M; Curkova AK; Schwarczova Z; Sochorova R; Simaljakova M; Buchvald J
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2011 Oct; 13(5):210-5. PubMed ID: 21932934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fixed, low radiant exposure vs. incremental radiant exposure approach for diode laser hair reduction: a randomized, split axilla, comparative single-blinded trial.
Pavlović MD; Adamič M; Nenadić D
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2015 Dec; 29(12):2377-81. PubMed ID: 26299540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Photoepilation with a diode laser vs. intense pulsed light: a randomized, intrapatient left-to-right trial.
Klein A; Steinert S; Baeumler W; Landthaler M; Babilas P
Br J Dermatol; 2013 Jun; 168(6):1287-93. PubMed ID: 23278132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Safety and efficacy of low fluence, high repetition rate versus high fluence, low repetition rate 810-nm diode laser for axillary hair removal in Chinese women.
Li W; Liu C; Chen Z; Cai L; Zhou C; Xu Q; Li H; Zhang J
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2016 Nov; 18(7):393-396. PubMed ID: 27419804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Self-reported outcome after diode laser hair removal.
Zins JE; Alghoul M; Gonzalez AM; Strumble P
Ann Plast Surg; 2008 Mar; 60(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 18443500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
