These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21197811)
1. State of literature in foot and ankle. Thordarson DB Foot Ankle Int; 2010 Nov; 31(11):1039-40. PubMed ID: 21197811 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality of research and level of evidence in foot and ankle publications. Barske HL; Baumhauer J Foot Ankle Int; 2012 Jan; 33(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 22381229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evidence and impact: should these articles change the practice of spine care? An evidence-based medicine process. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Mar; 35(6):E176-7. PubMed ID: 20195191 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Editorial: levels of evidence, evidence-based medicine, and Foot & Ankle International. Thordarson DB Foot Ankle Int; 2008 Sep; 29(9):881-2. PubMed ID: 18778664 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Publication rates of manuscript presentations at the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons Annual Scientific Conference between 1999 and 2008. Roukis TS J Foot Ankle Surg; 2011; 50(4):416-9. PubMed ID: 21549618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Levels of evidence in foot and ankle surgery literature: progress from 2000 to 2010? Zaidi R; Abbassian A; Cro S; Guha A; Cullen N; Singh D; Goldberg A J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Aug; 94(15):e1121-10. PubMed ID: 22855001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Phantom of the article. Hansen K S D Med; 2009 May; 62(5):191. PubMed ID: 19489342 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Testing for the presence of positive-outcome bias in peer review: a randomized controlled trial. Emerson GB; Warme WJ; Wolf FM; Heckman JD; Brand RA; Leopold SS Arch Intern Med; 2010 Nov; 170(21):1934-9. PubMed ID: 21098355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Shaping medical knowledge II: bias and balance. Rankin-Box D Complement Ther Clin Pract; 2006 May; 12(2):77-9. PubMed ID: 16648082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Reporting guidelines for research: curse or blessing?]. Ziegler A Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2009 Oct; 134(41):2077. PubMed ID: 19802770 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Without scientific integrity, there can be no evidence base. Jette AM Phys Ther; 2005 Nov; 85(11):1122-3. PubMed ID: 16253041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials? Poolman RW; Struijs PA; Krips R; Sierevelt IN; Lutz KH; Bhandari M BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Sep; 6():44. PubMed ID: 16965628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reviewing peer review: the three reviewers you meet at submission time. Clarke SP Can J Nurs Res; 2006 Dec; 38(4):5-9. PubMed ID: 17342873 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Foot & Ankle International: the preeminent foot and ankle journal in the world. Thordarson DB Foot Ankle Int; 2013 Sep; 34(9):1189. PubMed ID: 24003020 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Public health research and the need for methodological rigour. Daly J; Robinson P Aust N Z J Public Health; 2008 Oct; 32(5):403-4. PubMed ID: 18959539 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Characteristics of peer reviewed clinical medicine journals. Eldredge J Med Ref Serv Q; 1999; 18(2):13-26. PubMed ID: 10557841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]