These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21198623)
1. Increased hematocrit after applications of conducted energy weapons (including TASER(®) devices) to Sus scrofa. Jauchem JR J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56 Suppl 1():S229-33. PubMed ID: 21198623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An animal model to investigate effectiveness and safety of conducted energy weapons (including TASER devices). Jauchem JR J Forensic Sci; 2010 Mar; 55(2):521-6. PubMed ID: 20141556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 40-Hz square-wave stimulation requires less energy to produce muscle contraction: compared with the TASER® X26 conducted energy weapon. Comeaux JA; Jauchem JR; Cox DD; Crane CC; D'Andrea JA J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jul; 58(4):1026-31. PubMed ID: 23682682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of a TASER® conducted energy weapon on the circulating red-blood-cell population and other factors in Sus scrofa. Jauchem JR; Bernhard JA; Cerna CZ; Lim TY; Seaman RL; Tarango M Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2013 Sep; 9(3):308-20. PubMed ID: 23543463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exposures to conducted electrical weapons (including TASER® devices): how many and for how long are acceptable? Jauchem JR J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jan; 60 Suppl 1():S116-29. PubMed ID: 25443856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acidosis, lactate, electrolytes, muscle enzymes, and other factors in the blood of Sus scrofa following repeated TASER exposures. Jauchem JR; Sherry CJ; Fines DA; Cook MC Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Aug; 161(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 16289999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Survival of anesthetized Sus scrofa after cycling (7-second on/3-second off) exposures to an electronic control device for 3 minutes. Jauchem JR; Seaman RL; Fines DA Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2011 Jun; 32(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 21464698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Increased Hematocrit Due to Electrical-Waveform Exposures in Splenectomized Sus scrofa. Jauchem JR; Burns JM; Voorhees WB; Jirjis MB J Forensic Sci; 2019 Jul; 64(4):1196-1202. PubMed ID: 30508303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Physiological effects of the TASER C2 conducted energy weapon. Jauchem JR; Seaman RL; Klages CM Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2009; 5(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 19598011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Commentary on: Jauchem J. Increased hematocrit after applications of conducted energy weapons (including TASER devices) to Sus scrofa. J Forensic Sci 2011;56 (S1): S229-33. Dawes DM; Ho JD; Miner JR J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jul; 56(4):1078. PubMed ID: 21729085 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative study of conducted electrical weapon incapacitation during a goal-directed task. Ho J; Dawes DM; Kunz SN; Satpathy R; Klein L; Driver B; Stang JL Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2020 Dec; 16(4):613-621. PubMed ID: 32812174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Muscle contraction during electro-muscular incapacitation: A comparison between square-wave pulses and the TASER(®) X26 Electronic control device. Comeaux JA; Jauchem JR; Cox DD; Crane CC; D'Andrea JA J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56 Suppl 1():S95-100. PubMed ID: 20950313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Acidosis, lactate, electrolytes, muscle enzymes, and other factors in the blood of Sus scrofa following repeated TASER exposures. Miller CD Forensic Sci Int; 2007 May; 168(1):e17-8; author reply e19. PubMed ID: 17239551 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Absence of electrocardiographic change after prolonged application of a conducted electrical weapon in physically exhausted adults. Ho JD; Dawes DM; Heegaard WG; Calkins HG; Moscati RM; Miner JR J Emerg Med; 2011 Nov; 41(5):466-72. PubMed ID: 19443165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of continuous application of the TASER X26 waveform on Sus scrofa. Jenkins DM; Murray WB; Kennett MJ; Hughes EL; Werner JR J Forensic Sci; 2013 May; 58(3):684-92. PubMed ID: 23489132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of three conducted electrical weapons in a surrogate swine cardiac safety model. Dawes DM; Ho JD; Halperin HR; Fink SJ; Driver BE; Klein LR J Forensic Leg Med; 2021 Jan; 77():102088. PubMed ID: 33242742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conducted electrical weapon use by law enforcement: an evaluation of safety and injury. Strote J; Walsh M; Angelidis M; Basta A; Hutson HR J Trauma; 2010 May; 68(5):1239-46. PubMed ID: 20032795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Introduction of the conducted electrical weapon into a hospital setting. Ho JD; Clinton JE; Lappe MA; Heegaard WG; Williams MF; Miner JR J Emerg Med; 2011 Sep; 41(3):317-23. PubMed ID: 20117901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prolonged TASER use on exhausted humans does not worsen markers of acidosis. Ho JD; Dawes DM; Bultman LL; Moscati RM; Janchar TA; Miner JR Am J Emerg Med; 2009 May; 27(4):413-8. PubMed ID: 19555610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pathophysiologic changes due to TASER® devices versus excited delirium: potential relevance to deaths-in-custody? Jauchem JR J Forensic Leg Med; 2011 May; 18(4):145-53. PubMed ID: 21550562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]