These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21199503)

  • 21. The effects of humor on memory for non-sensical pictures.
    Takahashi M; Inoue T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Sep; 132(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 19591969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Can chimpanzee infants (Pan troglodytes) form categorical representations in the same manner as human infants (Homo sapiens)?
    Murai C; Kosugi D; Tomonaga M; Tanaka M; Matsuzawa T; Itakura S
    Dev Sci; 2005 May; 8(3):240-54. PubMed ID: 15819756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Infant temperament and information processing in a visual categorization task.
    Vonderlin E; Pahnke J; Pauen S
    Infant Behav Dev; 2008 Dec; 31(4):559-69. PubMed ID: 18804872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. N250 ERP correlates of the acquisition of face representations across different images.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR; Burton AM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 18702593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparing distances in mental images constructed from visual experience or verbal descriptions: the impact of survey versus route perspective.
    Péruch P; Chabanne V; Nesa MP; Thinus-Blanc C; Denis M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Nov; 59(11):1950-67. PubMed ID: 16987783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Timing is everything: changes in presentation rate have opposite effects on auditory and visual implicit statistical learning.
    Emberson LL; Conway CM; Christiansen MH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 May; 64(5):1021-40. PubMed ID: 21347988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. What are you looking at? Infants' neural processing of an adult's object-directed eye gaze.
    Hoehl S; Reid V; Mooney J; Striano T
    Dev Sci; 2008 Jan; 11(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 18171361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Young infants readily use proximity to organize visual pattern information.
    Quinn PC; Bhatt RS; Hayden A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):289-98. PubMed ID: 17643382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Infants' perception of object-surface interplays.
    Morgante JD; Johnson SP
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2011 Nov; 29(Pt 4):999-1005. PubMed ID: 21995749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The role of labels and motions in infant category learning.
    Sučević J; Althaus N; Plunkett K
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2021 May; 205():105062. PubMed ID: 33508654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Does changing the reference frame affect infant categorization of the spatial relation BETWEEN?
    Quinn PC; Doran MM; Papafragou A
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 May; 109(1):109-22. PubMed ID: 21112596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The role of multisensory memories in unisensory object discrimination.
    Lehmann S; Murray MM
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 24(2):326-34. PubMed ID: 15993770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Visual object representations can be formed outside the focus of voluntary attention: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Müller D; Winkler I; Roeber U; Schaffer S; Czigler I; Schröger E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1179-88. PubMed ID: 19445610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Adult gaze influences infant attention and object processing: implications for cognitive neuroscience.
    Reid VM; Striano T
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Mar; 21(6):1763-6. PubMed ID: 15845105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Visual processing speed: effects of auditory input on visual processing.
    Robinson CW; Sloutsky VM
    Dev Sci; 2007 Nov; 10(6):734-40. PubMed ID: 17973789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Selective impairment in visual short-term memory binding.
    Parra MA; Sala SD; Logie RH; Abrahams S
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2009 Oct; 26(7):583-605. PubMed ID: 20127543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Learning to Individuate: The Specificity of Labels Differentially Impacts Infant Visual Attention.
    Pickron CB; Iyer A; Fava E; Scott LS
    Child Dev; 2018 May; 89(3):698-710. PubMed ID: 29219170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of eye gaze on spoken word processing: an ERP study with infants.
    Parise E; Handl A; Palumbo L; Friederici AD
    Child Dev; 2011; 82(3):842-53. PubMed ID: 21410929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Individual differences in the visual attention of human infants: further evidence for separate sensitization and habituation processes.
    Peterzell DH
    Dev Psychobiol; 1993 May; 26(4):207-18. PubMed ID: 8354426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Monolingual, bilingual, trilingual: infants' language experience influences the development of a word-learning heuristic.
    Byers-Heinlein K; Werker JF
    Dev Sci; 2009 Sep; 12(5):815-23. PubMed ID: 19702772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.