These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21199823)
1. Automation of film densitometry for application in personal monitoring. Taheri M; Movafeghi A; Rastkhah N Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):239-42. PubMed ID: 21199823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of an Epson flatbed scanner to read Gafchromic EBT films for radiation dosimetry. Ferreira BC; Lopes MC; Capela M Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(4):1073-85. PubMed ID: 19168937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A whole-body dosimetry system for personal monitoring based on hot-pressed thin layer TLD. Busch F; Engelhardt J; Martini E; Lesz J Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):246-8. PubMed ID: 21227958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Precautions and strategies in using a commercial flatbed scanner for radiochromic film dosimetry. Paelinck L; De Neve W; De Wagter C Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):231-42. PubMed ID: 17183138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of active personal dosemeters as a personal monitoring device: comparison with TL dosimetry. Boziari A; Koukorava C; Carinou E; Hourdakis CJ; Kamenopoulou V Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):173-6. PubMed ID: 21196464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improvement and calibration of a SSNT personal dosemeter and study of importance of albedo factor for dose calculation. Torkzadeh F; Taheri M Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):224-8. PubMed ID: 16980708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. EURADOS INTERCOMPARISONS ON WHOLE-BODY DOSEMETERS FOR PHOTONS FROM 2008 TO 2014. Figel M; Stadtmann H; Grimbergen TW; McWhan A; Romero AM Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):113-6. PubMed ID: 26838064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The response of the new MD-V2-55 radiochromic film exposed to 60Co gamma rays. Massillon-Jl G; Zúñiga-Meneses L Phys Med Biol; 2010 Sep; 55(18):5437-49. PubMed ID: 20736498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Principles for the design and calibration of radiation protection dosemeters for operational and protection quantities for eye lens dosimetry. Bordy JM; Gualdrini G; Daures J; Mariotti F Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):257-61. PubMed ID: 21362692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Low and high dose measurement by Agfa personal monitoring film and FD-III-B badge dosimeter system. Mihai F; Bercea S; Stochioiu A; Celarel A; Udup E; Tudor I Appl Radiat Isot; 2010; 68(4-5):614-6. PubMed ID: 19815420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Official dosimetry with personal electronic dosemeters--the framework in Germany. Czarwinski R; Kaulard J; Pfeffer W Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):267-70. PubMed ID: 16987912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric characterization of GafChromic EBT film and its implication on film dosimetry quality assurance. Fuss M; Sturtewagen E; De Wagter C; Georg D Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(14):4211-25. PubMed ID: 17664604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of imaging plates with track detectors for fast-neutron dosimetry. Belafrites A; Nourreddine A; Mouhssine D; Nachab A; Pape A; Boucenna A; Fernández F Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):333-6. PubMed ID: 15353669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. EURADOS self-sustained programme of intercomparisons for individual monitoring services. Grimbergen TW; Figel M; Romero AM; Stadtmann H; McWhan AF Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):266-74. PubMed ID: 21242166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Personal monitor glass badge: theoretical dosemeter response calculated with the Monte Carlo transport code MCNPX. Hocine N; Donadille L; Huet C; Itié C; Clairand I Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):231-3. PubMed ID: 21335330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Potential of modern technologies for improvement of in vivo calibration. Franck D; de Carlan L; Fisher H; Pierrat N; Schlagbauer M; Wahl W Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):438-43. PubMed ID: 17337736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of different recombination methods in mixed radiation fields at high energy accelerators. Zielczynski M; Golnik N; Gryzinski MA Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 126(1-4):248-52. PubMed ID: 17575296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing different error-conditions in film dosemeter evaluation. Roed H; Figel M Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):23-7. PubMed ID: 17846026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a new self-developing instant film for imaging and dosimetry. Watanabe Y; Patel GN; Patel P Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):121-4. PubMed ID: 16644995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Linear vs. function-based dose algorithm designs. Stanford N Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):253-6. PubMed ID: 21199827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]