BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21200238)

  • 1. Discussion. Form stability of the Style 410 anatomically shaped cohesive silicone gel-filled breast implant in subglandular breast augmentation evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Hammond DC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Jan; 127(1):414-416. PubMed ID: 21200238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Form stability of the Style 410 anatomically shaped cohesive silicone gel-filled breast implant in subglandular breast augmentation evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Weum S; de Weerd L; Kristiansen B
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Jan; 127(1):409-413. PubMed ID: 21200237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Primary breast augmentation clinical trial outcomes stratified by surgical incision, anatomical placement and implant device type.
    Namnoum JD; Largent J; Kaplan HM; Oefelein MG; Brown MH
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Sep; 66(9):1165-72. PubMed ID: 23664574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Subglandular breast augmentation with textured, anatomic, cohesive silicone implants: a review of 440 consecutive patients.
    Lista F; Tutino R; Khan A; Ahmad J
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Aug; 132(2):295-303. PubMed ID: 23584627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient-reported satisfaction and health-related quality of life following breast reconstruction: a comparison of shaped cohesive gel and round cohesive gel implant recipients.
    Macadam SA; Ho AL; Lennox PA; Pusic AL
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Mar; 131(3):431-441. PubMed ID: 23142936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective study comparing two brands of cohesive gel breast implants with anatomic shape: 5-year follow-up evaluation.
    Niechajev I; Jurell G; Lohjelm L
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2007; 31(6):697-710. PubMed ID: 17653683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Form stability of the style 410 implant: definitions, conjectures, and the rest of the story.
    Tebbetts JB
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Sep; 128(3):825-826. PubMed ID: 21866027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast implant stability in the subfascial plane and the new shaped silicone gel breast implants.
    Sampaio Góes JC
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2010 Feb; 34(1):23-28. PubMed ID: 19936826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Guidelines for breast augmentation with silicone implants].
    Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 29(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 23600119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Longitudinal Ultrasound Study of Breast Implant Rupture Over a Six-Year Interval.
    Rochira D; Cavalcanti P; Ottaviani A; Tambasco D
    Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Feb; 76(2):150-4. PubMed ID: 25954847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Role of Macrotextured Shaped Extra Full Projection Cohesive Gel Implants in Primary Aesthetic Breast Augmentation.
    Montemurro P; Cheema M; Hedén P; Ferri M; Quattrini Li A; Avvedimento S
    Aesthet Surg J; 2017 Apr; 37(4):408-418. PubMed ID: 27836857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Silicone gel-filled breast implants approved.
    FDA Consum; 2007; 41(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 17342831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Allergan's silicone gel breast implants.
    Spear SL; Hedén P
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2007 Sep; 4(5):699-708. PubMed ID: 17850205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maximizing the use of precapsular space and the choice of implant type in breast augmentation mammaplasty revisions: review of 49 consecutive procedures and patient satisfaction assessment.
    Castello MF; Lazzeri D; Silvestri A; Agostini T; Pascone C; Marcelli C; Gigliotti D; D'Aniello C; Gasparotti M
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Oct; 35(5):828-38. PubMed ID: 21455821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transaxillary Subfascial Augmentation Mammaplasty with Anatomic Form-Stable Silicone Implants.
    Munhoz AM; Gemperli R; Sampaio Goes JC
    Clin Plast Surg; 2015 Oct; 42(4):565-84. PubMed ID: 26408444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Commentary on: Role of Macrotextured Shaped Extra Full Projection Cohesive Gel Implants in Primary Aesthetic Breast Augmentation.
    Cooter RD
    Aesthet Surg J; 2017 Apr; 37(4):419-420. PubMed ID: 28364528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anatomically shaped breast prosthesis in vivo: a change of dimension?
    Nipshagen MD; Beekman WH; Esmé DL; de Becker J
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2007; 31(5):540-3. PubMed ID: 17694253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of neopectoral pocket in revisionary breast surgery.
    Maxwell GP; Birchenough SA; Gabriel A
    Aesthet Surg J; 2009; 29(5):379-85. PubMed ID: 19825466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast augmentation with anatomical cohesive gel implants: the world's largest current experience.
    Hedén P; Jernbeck J; Hober M
    Clin Plast Surg; 2001 Jul; 28(3):531-52. PubMed ID: 11471959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Suturing of a textured breast implant filled with cohesive silicone gel to prevent dislocation.
    Chantal M; Melis P; Marco R
    Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg; 2003; 37(4):236-8. PubMed ID: 14582758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.