333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21203706)
1. Two-year clinical evaluation of resinous restorative systems in non-carious cervical lesions.
Santiago SL; Passos VF; Vieira AH; Navarro MF; Lauris JR; Franco EB
Braz Dent J; 2010; 21(3):229-34. PubMed ID: 21203706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 5-year clinical performance of resin composite versus resin modified glass ionomer restorative system in non-carious cervical lesions.
Franco EB; Benetti AR; Ishikiriama SK; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Jorge MF; Navarro MF
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):403-8. PubMed ID: 16924979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Five-year double-blind randomized clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified resin in noncarious cervical lesions.
Loguercio AD; Reis A; Barbosa AN; Roulet JF
J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(4):323-32. PubMed ID: 15008339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Meta-Analysis of the Influence of Bonding Parameters on the Clinical Outcome of Tooth-colored Cervical Restorations.
Mahn E; Rousson V; Heintze S
J Adhes Dent; 2015 Aug; 17(5):391-403. PubMed ID: 26525003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Seven-year clinical performance of resin composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer restorations in noncarious cervical lesions.
Fagundes TC; Barata TJ; Bresciani E; Santiago S; Franco EB; Lauris JR; Navarro MF
Oper Dent; 2014; 39(6):578-87. PubMed ID: 24809539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and two polyacid-modified resin composites in cervical lesions restorations: 1-year follow-up.
Chinelatti MA; Ramos RP; Chimello DT; Palma-Dibb RG
J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Mar; 31(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 15025658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-year evaluation of different adhesion strategies in non-carious cervical lesion restorations: a randomized clinical trial.
Gonçalves DFM; Shinohara MS; Carvalho PRMA; Ramos FSES; Oliveira LC; Omoto ÉM; Fagundes TC
J Appl Oral Sci; 2021; 29():e20210192. PubMed ID: 34705986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hinkel R
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical Effectiveness of a Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement and a Mild One-step Self-etch Adhesive Applied Actively and Passively in Noncarious Cervical Lesions: An 18-Month Clinical Trial.
Jassal M; Mittal S; Tewari S
Oper Dent; 2018; 43(6):581-592. PubMed ID: 29782222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of dentin roughness on the adhesive performance in non-carious cervical lesions: A double-blind randomized clinical trial.
Loguercio AD; Luque-Martinez IV; Fuentes S; Reis A; Muñoz MA
J Dent; 2018 Feb; 69():60-69. PubMed ID: 28962842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The two-year clinical performance of esthetic restorative materials in noncarious cervical lesions.
Onal B; Pamir T
J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Nov; 136(11):1547-55. PubMed ID: 16329418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A randomized controlled clinical trial of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions at 1 year.
Van Landuyt KL; Peumans M; Fieuws S; De Munck J; Cardoso MV; Ermis RB; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
J Dent; 2008 Oct; 36(10):847-55. PubMed ID: 18656295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and a compomer in restoring non-carious cervical lesions. 5-year results.
Folwaczny M; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 11572293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. One-year Clinical Evaluation of Resin Composite Restorations of Noncarious Cervical Lesions in Smokers.
de Carvalho LD; Gondo R; Lopes GC
J Adhes Dent; 2015 Aug; 17(5):405-11. PubMed ID: 26525004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Class V lesions restored with four different tooth-colored materials--3-year results.
Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
Clin Oral Investig; 2001 Mar; 5(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 11355096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in class V non-carious lesions.
van Dijken JW
Dent Mater; 2000 Jul; 16(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 10831784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions.
van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):915-22. PubMed ID: 18155288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Thirty-six-month clinical evaluation of different adhesive strategies of a universal adhesive.
Atalay C; Ozgunaltay G; Yazici AR
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Apr; 24(4):1569-1578. PubMed ID: 31468262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
