These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21203733)

  • 1. Evaluation of surface roughness of microhybrid and nanofilled composites after pH-cycling and simulated toothbrushing.
    Penteado RA; Tonholo J; Júnior JG; Silva MF; Queiroz Cda S; Cavalli V; Rego MA; Liporoni PC
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Dec; 11(6):E017-24. PubMed ID: 21203733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing.
    Senawongse P; Pongprueksa P
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(5):265-73; discussion 274-5. PubMed ID: 17877626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Streptococcus mutans biofilm adhesion on composite resin surfaces after different finishing and polishing techniques.
    Pereira CA; Eskelson E; Cavalli V; Liporoni PC; Jorge AO; do Rego MA
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 21740238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of polishing systems on stain susceptibility and surface roughness of nanocomposite resin material.
    Barakah HM; Taher NM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):625-31. PubMed ID: 24721503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of prophylactic polishing pastes and toothbrushing on the surface roughness of resin composite materials in vitro.
    Neme AM; Wagner WC; Pink FE; Frazier KB
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):808-15. PubMed ID: 14653298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of 6 months of aging in water on hardness and surface roughness of two microhybrid dental composites.
    de Moraes RR; Marimon JL; Schneider LF; Sinhoreti MA; Correr-Sobrinho L; Bueno M
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 17(4):323-6. PubMed ID: 18266654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of surface sealants in the roughness of composites after a simulated toothbrushing test.
    Cilli R; de Mattos MC; Honorio HM; Rios D; de Araujo PA; Prakki A
    J Dent; 2009 Dec; 37(12):970-7. PubMed ID: 19686798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of toothbrushing on surface gloss of resin composites.
    Lefever D; Perakis N; Roig M; Krejci I; Ardu S
    Am J Dent; 2012 Feb; 25(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 22558694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of a desensitizing paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate on the surface roughness of dental materials and human dental enamel.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Garcia-Godoy A; Garcia-Godoy C
    Am J Dent; 2009 Mar; 22 Spec No A():21A-24A. PubMed ID: 19472558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surface deterioration of dental materials after simulated toothbrushing in relation to brushing time and load.
    Heintze SD; Forjanic M; Ohmiti K; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2010 Apr; 26(4):306-19. PubMed ID: 20036418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surface roughness of enamel and four resin composites.
    Botta AC; Duarte S; Paulin Filho PI; Gheno SM; Powers JM
    Am J Dent; 2009 Oct; 22(5):252-4. PubMed ID: 20225464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The mechanical properties of nanofilled resin-based composites: the impact of dry and wet cyclic pre-loading on bi-axial flexure strength.
    Curtis AR; Palin WM; Fleming GJ; Shortall AC; Marquis PM
    Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):188-97. PubMed ID: 18656255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Longitudinal evaluation of simulated toothbrushing on the roughness and optical stability of microfilled, microhybrid and nanofilled resin-based composites.
    da Silva EM; Dória J; da Silva Jde J; Santos GV; Guimarães JG; Poskus LT
    J Dent; 2013 Nov; 41(11):1081-90. PubMed ID: 23994711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of chemical and mechanical degradation on surface roughness of three glass ionomers and a nanofilled resin composite.
    Carvalho FG; Sampaio CS; Fucio SB; Carlo HL; Correr-Sobrinho L; Puppin-Rontani RM
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):509-17. PubMed ID: 22433031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surface texture of four nanofilled and one hybrid composite after finishing.
    Jung M; Sehr K; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 17288328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surface roughness and morphology of three nanocomposites after two different polishing treatments by a multitechnique approach.
    Janus J; Fauxpoint G; Arntz Y; Pelletier H; Etienne O
    Dent Mater; 2010 May; 26(5):416-25. PubMed ID: 20097415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of cigarette smoke on color stability and surface roughness of dental composites.
    Alandia-Roman CC; Cruvinel DR; Sousa AB; Pires-de-Souza FC; Panzeri H
    J Dent; 2013 Aug; 41 Suppl 3():e73-9. PubMed ID: 23270748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of microhybrid, packable and nanofilled resin composites in Class I restorations.
    Sadeghi M; Lynch CD; Shahamat N
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 37(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 20202097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wear and surface roughness of silorane composites after pH cycling and toothbrushing abrasion.
    Ishikiriama SK; De Oliveira GU; Maenosono RM; Wang L; Duarte MA; Mondelli RF
    Am J Dent; 2014 Aug; 27(4):195-8. PubMed ID: 25831602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rotating fatigue and flexural strength of direct and indirect resin-composite restorative materials.
    Mirmohammadi H; Kleverlaan CJ; Feilzer AJ
    Am J Dent; 2009 Aug; 22(4):219-22. PubMed ID: 19824558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.