These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21203733)

  • 41. Surface properties of universal and flowable nanohybrid composites after simulated tooth brushing.
    Jin J; Takahashi R; Hickel R; Kunzelmann KH
    Am J Dent; 2014 Jun; 27(3):149-54. PubMed ID: 25208363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Evaluation of the roughness of composite resins submitted to different surface treatments.
    Gonçalves MA; Teixeira VC; Rodrigues SS; de Oliveira RS; Salvio LA
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2012; 25(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 22928387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effect of prophylactic polishing protocols on the surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials.
    Neme AL; Frazier KB; Roeder LB; Debner TL
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 11817469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effects of commonly consumed beverages on surface roughness and color stability of the nano, microhybrid and hybrid composite resins: an in vitro study.
    Reddy PS; Tejaswi KL; Shetty S; Annapoorna BM; Pujari SC; Thippeswamy HM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):718-23. PubMed ID: 24309354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Laboratory evaluation of the effect of toothbrushing on surface gloss of resin composites.
    Lefever D; Krejci I; Ardu S
    Am J Dent; 2014 Feb; 27(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 24902404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of flexural properties and surface roughness of nanohybrid and microhybrid dental composites.
    Melander J; Dunn WP; Link MP; Wang Y; Xu C; Walker MP
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(5):342-7; quiz 348-9. PubMed ID: 22313818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effect of brushing and accelerated ageing on color stability and surface roughness of composites.
    Roselino Lde M; Cruvinel DR; Chinelatti MA; Pires-de-Souza Fde C
    J Dent; 2013 Nov; 41 Suppl 5():e54-61. PubMed ID: 23851131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin and ormocer-based tooth-colored restorative materials after several finishing and polishing procedures.
    Başeren M
    J Biomater Appl; 2004 Oct; 19(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 15381785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Wear resistance of packable resin composites after simulated toothbrushing test.
    Wang L; Garcia FC; Amarante de Araújo P; Franco EB; Mondelli RF
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2004; 16(5):303-14; discussion 314-5. PubMed ID: 15726799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effect of bleaching on staining susceptibility of resin composite restorative materials.
    Celik C; Yüzügüllü B; Erkut S; Yazici AR
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(6):407-14. PubMed ID: 20002929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The effect of two polishing pastes on the surface roughness of bis-acryl composite and methacrylate-based resins.
    Sen D; Göller G; Işsever H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 12474004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations.
    Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Dec; 31(124):27-34. PubMed ID: 19441264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effect of thermocycling on roughness of nanofill, microfill and microhybrid composites.
    Dos Santos PH; Catelan A; Albuquerque Guedes AP; Umeda Suzuki TY; de Lima Godas AG; Fraga Briso AL; Bedran-Russo AK
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2015 Apr; 73(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 25356634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Surface roughness and maintenance of surface sealants for resin composites after toothbrushing.
    Bonato F; Spohr AM; Mota EG; Rodrigues-Junior SA; Burnett LH
    Am J Dent; 2016 Feb; 29(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 27093775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Microstructural characterization and fracture behavior of a microhybrid and a nanofill composite.
    Rodrigues SA; Scherrer SS; Ferracane JL; Della Bona A
    Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1281-8. PubMed ID: 18374408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Repolishing Resin Composites After Bleaching Treatments: Effects on Color Stability and Smoothness.
    Rodrigues CS; Nora BD; Mallmann A; May LG; Jacques LB
    Oper Dent; 2019; 44(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 29856701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effect of different surface penetrating sealants on the roughness of a nanofiller composite resin.
    Lopes MB; Saquy PC; Moura SK; Wang L; Graciano FM; Correr Sobrinho L; Gonini Júnior A
    Braz Dent J; 2012; 23(6):692-7. PubMed ID: 23338262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effect of three indigenous food stains on resin-based, microhybrid-, and nanocomposites.
    Malhotra N; Shenoy RP; Acharya S; Shenoy R; Mayya S
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2011 Aug; 23(4):250-7. PubMed ID: 21806757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Novel nano-particles as fillers for an experimental resin-based restorative material.
    Rüttermann S; Wandrey C; Raab WH; Janda R
    Acta Biomater; 2008 Nov; 4(6):1846-53. PubMed ID: 18635411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Assessment of polymerization contraction stress of three composite resins.
    Cadenaro M; Biasotto M; Scuor N; Breschi L; Davidson CL; Di Lenarda R
    Dent Mater; 2008 May; 24(5):681-5. PubMed ID: 17765300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.