BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21205166)

  • 1. Reliability of panoramic radiographs for the assessment of mandibular elongation after distraction osteogenesis procedures.
    Hazan-Molina H; Molina-Hazan V; Schendel SA; Aizenbud D
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 Feb; 14(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 21205166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Curvilinear mandibular distraction results and long-term stability effects in a group of 40 patients.
    Aizenbud D; Hazan-Molina H; Thimmappa B; Hopkins EM; Schendel SA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Jun; 125(6):1771-1780. PubMed ID: 20517103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Linear mandibular measurements: comparison between orthopantomograms and lateral cephalograms.
    Ongkosuwito EM; Dieleman MM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Mulder PG; van Neck JW
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2009 Mar; 46(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 19254052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mandibular distraction with MD-DOS device.
    Karacay S; Akin E; Okçu KM; Bengi AO; Altug HA
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Jul; 75(4):685-93. PubMed ID: 16097242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term stability and growth following unilateral mandibular distraction in growing children with craniofacial microsomia.
    Shetye PR; Grayson BH; Mackool RJ; McCarthy JG
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Sep; 118(4):985-995. PubMed ID: 16980861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ultrasound: assessment of the distraction osteogenesis wound in patients undergoing mandibular lengthening.
    Troulis MJ; Coppe C; O'Neill MJ; Kaban LB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Oct; 61(10):1144-9. PubMed ID: 14586848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stability of mandibular advancement procedures: bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus distraction osteogenesis.
    Vos MD; Baas EM; de Lange J; Bierenbroodspot F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 38(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 18977640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ten-year follow-up of a patient with hemifacial microsomia treated with distraction osteogenesis and orthodontics: an implant analysis.
    Işeri H; Kişnişci R; Altuğ-Ataç AT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):296-304. PubMed ID: 18675213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mandibular hypoplasia with curvilinear distraction.
    Keçik D; Aydoğdu E; Ateş U; Uçkan S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 21(1):168-73. PubMed ID: 20072008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mandibular lengthening by distraction osteogenesis in children--a one-year follow-up study.
    Huang CS; Ko WC; Lin WY; Liou EJ; Hong KF; Chen YR
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1999 May; 36(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 10342617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long term stability of mandibular advancement procedures: bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus distraction osteogenesis.
    Baas EM; Pijpe J; de Lange J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 41(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 22137334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-Term Effects of Distraction Osteogenesis of the Mandible.
    Peacock ZS; Salcines A; Troulis MJ; Kaban LB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 76(7):1512-1523. PubMed ID: 29425758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Soft tissue to hard tissue advancement ratios for mandibular elongation using distraction osteogenesis in children.
    Melugin MB; Hanson PR; Bergstrom CA; Schuckit WI; Gerard Bradley T
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jan; 76(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 16448272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of transmandibular symphyseal distraction on teeth, bone, and temporomandibular joint.
    Gunbay T; Akay MC; Aras A; Gomel M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2254-65. PubMed ID: 19761921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Facial symmetry after distraction osteogenesis and orthodontic therapy.
    Tehranchi A; Behnia H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Aug; 120(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 11500656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in width of lower face after unilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
    Tan W; Yu B; Niu F; Gui L
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 23(1):94-7. PubMed ID: 22337382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Panoramic radiographs: a tool for investigating skeletal pattern.
    Akcam MO; Altiok T; Ozdiler E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 12594424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cephalometric evaluation of the craniofacial complex in patients treated with an intraoral distraction osteogenesis device: a preliminary report.
    Trahar M; Sheffield R; Kawamoto H; Lee HF; Ting K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Dec; 124(6):639-50. PubMed ID: 14666076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Research methods in dentistry 9. Follow-up of permucosal implants in an edentate mandible using panoramic radiography].
    Verhoeven JW; Cune MS
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2005 Mar; 112(3):86-9. PubMed ID: 15792391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Soft tissue stability in segmental distraction of the anterior mandibular alveolar process. A 2-year follow-up.
    Joss CU; Triaca A; Antonini M; Kiliaridis S; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 41(5):560-5. PubMed ID: 22204924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.