353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21206363)
1. Predicting the intelligibility of vocoded speech.
Chen F; Loizou PC
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(3):331-8. PubMed ID: 21206363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contribution of consonant landmarks to speech recognition in simulated acoustic-electric hearing.
Chen F; Loizou PC
Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 20081538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predicting the intelligibility of vocoded and wideband Mandarin Chinese.
Chen F; Loizou PC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3281-90. PubMed ID: 21568429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Objective measures for predicting speech intelligibility in noisy conditions based on new band-importance functions.
Ma J; Hu Y; Loizou PC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3387-405. PubMed ID: 19425678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The relative importance of temporal envelope information for intelligibility prediction: a study on cochlear-implant vocoded speech.
Chen F
Med Eng Phys; 2011 Oct; 33(8):1033-8. PubMed ID: 21546304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of noise suppression and envelope dynamic range compression on the intelligibility of vocoded sentences for a tonal language.
Chen F; Zheng D; Tsao Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Sep; 142(3):1157. PubMed ID: 28964090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influences of noise-interruption and information-bearing acoustic changes on understanding simulated electric-acoustic speech.
Stilp C; Donaldson G; Oh S; Kong YY
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Nov; 140(5):3971. PubMed ID: 27908030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Release from informational masking in a monaural competing-speech task with vocoded copies of the maskers presented contralaterally.
Bernstein JG; Iyer N; Brungart DS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):702-13. PubMed ID: 25698005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors affecting masking release in cochlear-implant vocoded speech.
Li N; Loizou PC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):338-46. PubMed ID: 19603890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
Phatak SA; Grant KW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations: Effects of carrier type, interfering noise, and subject experience.
Whitmal NA; Poissant SF; Freyman RL; Helfer KS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2376-88. PubMed ID: 17902872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transfer of auditory perceptual learning with spectrally reduced speech to speech and nonspeech tasks: implications for cochlear implants.
Loebach JL; Pisoni DB; Svirsky MA
Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):662-74. PubMed ID: 19773659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spectral-Temporal Trade-Off in Vocoded Sentence Recognition: Effects of Age, Hearing Thresholds, and Working Memory.
Shader MJ; Yancey CM; Gordon-Salant S; Goupell MJ
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1226-1235. PubMed ID: 32032222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing.
Bernstein JG; Summers V; Grassi E; Grant KW
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.
Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X; Krishnan A
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spatial release from masking with noise-vocoded speech.
Freyman RL; Balakrishnan U; Helfer KS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1627-37. PubMed ID: 19045654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of temporal fine structure on speech intelligibility modeling.
Chen F; Guan T; Wong LL
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():4199-202. PubMed ID: 24110658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spectral density affects the intelligibility of tone-vocoded speech: Implications for cochlear implant simulations.
Rosen S; Zhang Y; Speers K
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):EL318-23. PubMed ID: 26428833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of Additional Low-Pass-Filtered Speech on Listening Effort for Noise-Band-Vocoded Speech in Quiet and in Noise.
Pals C; Sarampalis A; van Dijk M; Başkent D
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 29757801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vocoder simulations of highly focused cochlear stimulation with limited dynamic range and discriminable steps.
Stafford RC; Stafford JW; Wells JD; Loizou PC; Keller MD
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):262-70. PubMed ID: 24322978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
