These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21206363)

  • 41. Analysis of a simplified normalized covariance measure based on binary weighting functions for predicting the intelligibility of noise-suppressed speech.
    Chen F; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3715-23. PubMed ID: 21218903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A multi-resolution envelope-power based model for speech intelligibility.
    Jørgensen S; Ewert SD; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):436-46. PubMed ID: 23862819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Gain-induced speech distortions and the absence of intelligibility benefit with existing noise-reduction algorithms.
    Kim G; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1581-96. PubMed ID: 21895096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Role of binaural hearing in speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking using vocoded speech.
    Garadat SN; Litovsky RY; Yu G; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2522-35. PubMed ID: 19894832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. An algorithm that improves speech intelligibility in noise for normal-hearing listeners.
    Kim G; Lu Y; Hu Y; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1486-94. PubMed ID: 19739761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Intelligibility of whispered speech in stationary and modulated noise maskers.
    Freyman RL; Griffin AM; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2514-23. PubMed ID: 23039445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Interaural level differences do not suffice for restoring spatial release from masking in simulated cochlear implant listening.
    Ihlefeld A; Litovsky RY
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e45296. PubMed ID: 23028914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Predicting the effects of periodicity on the intelligibility of masked speech: An evaluation of different modelling approaches and their limitations.
    Steinmetzger K; Zaar J; Relaño-Iborra H; Rosen S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Oct; 146(4):2562. PubMed ID: 31671986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effect of speech degradation on top-down repair: phonemic restoration with simulations of cochlear implants and combined electric-acoustic stimulation.
    Başkent D
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2012 Oct; 13(5):683-92. PubMed ID: 22569838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Environment-specific noise suppression for improved speech intelligibility by cochlear implant users.
    Hu Y; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jun; 127(6):3689-95. PubMed ID: 20550267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Speech Perception With Combined Electric-Acoustic Stimulation: A Simulation and Model Comparison.
    Rader T; Adel Y; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):e314-25. PubMed ID: 25989069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. An Evaluation of Output Signal to Noise Ratio as a Predictor of Cochlear Implant Speech Intelligibility.
    Watkins GD; Swanson BA; Suaning GJ
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):958-968. PubMed ID: 29474218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Notionally steady background noise acts primarily as a modulation masker of speech.
    Stone MA; Füllgrabe C; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jul; 132(1):317-26. PubMed ID: 22779480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effect of Dual-Carrier Processing on the Intelligibility of Concurrent Vocoded Sentences.
    Apoux F; Carter BL; Healy EW
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Nov; 61(11):2804-2813. PubMed ID: 30458525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Recognition of vocoded words and sentences in quiet and multi-talker babble with children and adults.
    Goupell MJ; Draves GT; Litovsky RY
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0244632. PubMed ID: 33373427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Ideal time-frequency masking algorithms lead to different speech intelligibility and quality in normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Koning R; Madhu N; Wouters J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Jan; 62(1):331-41. PubMed ID: 25167542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Contributions of cochlea-scaled entropy and consonant-vowel boundaries to prediction of speech intelligibility in noise.
    Chen F; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 May; 131(5):4104-13. PubMed ID: 22559382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Intelligibility prediction for speech mixed with white Gaussian noise at low signal-to-noise ratios.
    Graetzer S; Hopkins C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Feb; 149(2):1346. PubMed ID: 33639794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.