These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

637 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21206391)

  • 1. Impact of floating mass transducer coupling and positioning in round window vibroplasty.
    Rajan GP; Lampacher P; Ambett R; Dittrich G; Kuthubutheen J; Wood B; McArthur A; Marino R
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Feb; 32(2):271-7. PubMed ID: 21206391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does Coupling and Positioning in Vibroplasty Matter? A Prospective Cohort Study.
    Marino R; Lampacher P; Dittrich G; Tavora-Vieira D; Kuthubutheen J; Rajan GP
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Aug; 36(7):1223-30. PubMed ID: 26075675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrocochleography in round window Vibrant Soundbridge implantation.
    Colletti V; Mandalà M; Colletti L
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Apr; 146(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 22140205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Alternative Coupling Methods of the Vibrant Soundbridge Floating Mass Transducer.
    Busch S; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(6):347-355. PubMed ID: 28068651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term outcome of round window Vibrant SoundBridge implantation in extensive ossicular chain defects.
    Colletti L; Mandalà M; Colletti V
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Jul; 149(1):134-41. PubMed ID: 23585147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consensus statement on round window vibroplasty.
    Beltrame AM; Todt I; Sprinzl G; Profant M; Schwab B
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2014 Oct; 123(10):734-40. PubMed ID: 24842869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do we really need a Coupler for the round window application of an AMEI?
    Schwab B; Grigoleit S; Teschner M
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Sep; 34(7):1181-5. PubMed ID: 23921921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vibroplasty in mixed and conductive hearing loss: comparison of different coupling methods.
    Vyskocil E; Riss D; Honeder C; Arnoldner C; Hamzavi JS; Baumgartner WD; Flak S; Gstoettner W
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Jun; 124(6):1436-43. PubMed ID: 24338550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reinforced active middle ear implant fixation in incus vibroplasty.
    Mlynski R; Dalhoff E; Heyd A; Wildenstein D; Hagen R; Gummer AW; Schraven SP
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 25099400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Active middle ear implants in patients undergoing subtotal petrosectomy: long-term follow-up.
    Henseler MA; Polanski JF; Schlegel C; Linder T
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Mar; 35(3):437-41. PubMed ID: 24492140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Round window stimulation for conductive and mixed hearing loss.
    Dillon MT; Tubbs RS; Adunka MC; King ER; Hillman TA; Adunka OF; Chen DA; Buchman CA
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Oct; 35(9):1601-8. PubMed ID: 25111522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Treatment of the atretic ear with round window vibrant soundbridge implantation in infants and children: electrocochleography and audiologic outcomes.
    Mandalà M; Colletti L; Colletti V
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Oct; 32(8):1250-5. PubMed ID: 21897320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of Floating-Mass Transducer Coupling Efficiency for Active Middle-Ear Implants on Speech Recognition.
    Müller A; Mir-Salim P; Zellhuber N; Helbig R; Bloching M; Schmidt T; Koscielny S; Dziemba OC; Plontke SK; Rahne T
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Jul; 38(6):809-814. PubMed ID: 28383463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term Stability of the Active Middle-ear Implant with Floating-mass Transducer Technology: A Single-center Study.
    Schraven SP; Gromann W; Rak K; Shehata-Dieler W; Hagen R; Mlynski R
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Mar; 37(3):252-66. PubMed ID: 26796211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Benefits of active middle ear implants in mixed hearing loss: Stapes versus round window.
    Lee JM; Jung J; Moon IS; Kim SH; Choi JY
    Laryngoscope; 2017 Jun; 127(6):1435-1441. PubMed ID: 27560038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pros and Cons of Round Window Vibroplasty in Open Cavities: Audiological, Surgical, and Quality of Life Outcomes.
    Lassaletta L; Calvino M; Sánchez-Cuadrado I; Pérez-Mora RM; Muñoz E; Gavilán J
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):944-52. PubMed ID: 25839978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is the Bone-Conduction HeadBand test useful for predicting the functional outcome of a round window active middle ear implant?
    Monini S; Filippi C; Atturo F; Barbara M
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Sep; 34(7):1329-35. PubMed ID: 23867342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Round window vibroplasty in chronic ear surgery: comparison with conventional hearing rehabilitation.
    Edfeldt L; Rask-Andersen H
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2013 Aug; 133(8):814-25. PubMed ID: 23627989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clip vibroplasty: experimental evaluation and first clinical results.
    Hüttenbrink KB; Beutner D; Bornitz M; Luers JC; Zahnert T
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jun; 32(4):650-3. PubMed ID: 21765388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vibrant Soundbridge for hearing restoration after chronic ear surgery.
    Streitberger C; Perotti M; Beltrame MA; Giarbini N
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2009; 130(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 19813469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.