These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21207795)

  • 21. Temperature mediated coefficient of dimensional change of dental tooth-colored restorative materials.
    Sidhu SK; Carrick TE; McCabe JF
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):435-40. PubMed ID: 15081549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of surface characteristic of different restorative materials containing glass ionomer on
    Kelten OS; Hepdeniz OK; Tuncer Y; Kankaya DA; Gurdal O
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Jul; 23(7):957-964. PubMed ID: 32620725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The influence of 30-day-old Streptococcus mutans biofilm on the surface of esthetic restorative materials--an in vitro study.
    Fúcio SB; Carvalho FG; Sobrinho LC; Sinhoreti MA; Puppin-Rontani RM
    J Dent; 2008 Oct; 36(10):833-9. PubMed ID: 18621456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of prophylactic polishing protocols on the surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials.
    Neme AL; Frazier KB; Roeder LB; Debner TL
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 11817469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The anti-adherence activity and bactericidal effect of microparticulate silver additives in composite resin materials.
    Bürgers R; Eidt A; Frankenberger R; Rosentritt M; Schweikl H; Handel G; Hahnel S
    Arch Oral Biol; 2009 Jun; 54(6):595-601. PubMed ID: 19375069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Surface characteristics of tooth-colored restoratives polished utilizing different polishing systems.
    Yap AU; Lye KW; Sau CW
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(6):260-5. PubMed ID: 9610323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of the effect of topical fluorides on the commercially available conventional glass ionomers, resin modified glass ionomers and polyacid modified composite resins--an in vitro study.
    Setty JV; Singh S; Subba Reddy VV
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2003 Jun; 21(2):55-69. PubMed ID: 14700337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ability of different restorative materials to prevent in situ secondary caries: analysis by polarized light-microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray.
    Paradella TC; Koga-Ito CY; Jorge AO
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2008 Aug; 116(4):375-80. PubMed ID: 18705806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Laboratory strength of glass ionomer cement, compomers, and resin composites.
    Piwowarczyk A; Ottl P; Lauer HC; Büchler A
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 12087545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Leakage patterns associated with glass-ionomer-based resin restorations.
    Wieczkowski G; Joynt RB; Davis EL; Yu XY; Cleary K
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 1437682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Surface antibacterial properties of packable resin composites: part I.
    Matalon S; Slutzky H; Weiss EI
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Mar; 35(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 15119676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to provisional fixed prosthodontic material.
    Buergers R; Rosentritt M; Handel G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Dec; 98(6):461-9. PubMed ID: 18061740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of pH on the surface texture of glass ionomer based/containing restorative materials.
    Mohamed-Tahir MA; Yap AU
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(5):586-91. PubMed ID: 15470882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of chemo-mechanical caries removal on the surface topography of dental composite resin and glass-ionomer materials: an in vitro study.
    Arvidsson A; Ortengren U; Wennerberg A
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2004 Jun; 62(3):137-42. PubMed ID: 15370632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans on dental restorative materials.
    Montanaro L; Campoccia D; Rizzi S; Donati ME; Breschi L; Prati C; Arciola CR
    Biomaterials; 2004 Aug; 25(18):4457-63. PubMed ID: 15046936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Color changes of restorative materials exposed in vitro to cola beverage.
    Mohan M; Shey Z; Vaidyanathan J; Vaidyanathan TK; Munisamy S; Janal M
    Pediatr Dent; 2008; 30(4):309-16. PubMed ID: 18767510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Surface finish of a new hybrid aesthetic restorative material.
    Yap AU; Mok BY
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 11933907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Marginal sealing ability of three cervical restorative systems.
    Yap AU; Lim CC; Neo JC
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Nov; 26(11):817-20. PubMed ID: 8628842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Radiopacity of glass-ionomer/composite resin hybrid materials.
    Hara AT; Serra MC; Rodrigues Júnior AL
    Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(2):85-9. PubMed ID: 11445919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of esthetic parameters of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials and a polyacid-modified resin composite in Class V cervical lesions.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Sep; 30(9):607-14. PubMed ID: 10765866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.